SUPREME COURT EXPECTED TO RULE WITHIN SATURDAY ON WHETHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ACTUALLY HAVE ANY POWER OVER US STATES:
outsideonline.com
THIS INCLUDES GLOWIE AGENCIES
NUCLEAR HAPPENING
Nathan Long
Matthew Ramirez
H-He really is getting his revenge on Biden. Niggers actually have the balls to go all out unlike orange niggers.
Jackson Peterson
Rolling for Supreme Court ruling on whether the NSA should be dismantled over 5th Amendment policy.
Liam Thompson
>born to late to explore the world
>born to early to explore the galaxy
>born just in time to see Clarence Thomas justify slavery
Chase White
>the big question here is who has the authority to write regulations around power plant emissions: federal agencies or Congress itself
So he wants the Congress to write regulations on on plant emissions? But why? Isn't this just handing the ball from a federal agency to another federal entity? Can someone explain what the game plan is here?
Juan Garcia
Congress will have to do their chores.
Evan Moore
fpbp and checked
SENDING MY ENERGY TO GET A DECISION TODAY SHUTTING IT ALL DOWN!
Levi Anderson
roll
Eli Jones
They actually need majority in congress to pass stuff instead of just making it up out of thin air within the agency itself.
This includes everything. Not just energy, it also means any federal agency stuff made up without a pass in congress instantly becomes void.
Jacob Martinez
>So he wants the Congress to write regulations on on plant emissions? But why? Isn't this just handing the ball from a federal agency to another federal entity? Can someone explain what the game plan is here?
Copy of explanation i did on another thread
administrative law is cancer on the republican form of government.
It is the cause of civil forfeiture, and a lot of whole other shit, it's why regulatory agencies in europe are banning fucking vitamins, it's why regulatory agencies in the usa are closing paypal or fintech account for the lulz, it's why cops do civil forfeiture because you have cash on a route.
In all honestly it was not a bad idea at the time it was created since even shit like cars lacked regulations and with things like aviation and such the government had to grow to control this type of thing.
But the beast only grows to the point they want to control things without legislation worse it falls under a different system were you are not entitled to a legal defense unless you sue and pay for it.
Which means the rich and poor now have two separated legal systems in the administrative law thing.
Do they seize your car for the lulz?you pay their fee of 4k usd or a lawyer 20k usd
Everyone poor pays the fee, but this crap is expanding like cancer everywhere and destroying democracies, it used to be that liberal nations were stronger than autocracies because people invested in them and created more output, but regulatory agencies are destroying the west they want to control everything and with 0 legistlation, that's how we reach the covid quarantines enforced by local governments, everyone lost their minds because agencies could act independently doing whatever the fuck they wanted weather it was legal or not.
Angel Gomez
Slavery is legal already under the 14th amendment
Jackson Walker
Most states have their own glowie agencies. Maine DEA, NHDTF, GBI, state police, etc. How will this effect them?
Oliver Peterson
Actual laws must be debated and written, not some vague authority congress may not even constitutionally have, delegated to some group of bureaucrats.
Hunter Rogers
dems are going to pack the court with over 9000 traps
clarence won't be laughing so hard when he has to wear a dress to work
Camden Rogers
Okay, I get the picture now. thanks fellas.
Josiah Cruz
We get to pick congress and can remove members for making decisions we don't like. We have absolutely no control over unelected agencies. The US giving legislative power to unelected, unaccountable bodies is one of the worst things to happen.
Step one - return power to congress
Step two - return that power to the states
Daniel Ross
The great glowie shit posting war of 2022.
Oliver Cox
The government literally wrote itself a right to hold people as slaves into the 15th amendment dipshit
Cameron Hall
No, he wants congress to be required to write the regulations if they are going to exist. We all know congress is never going to actually write those regulations into law, so the most likely outcome is that they just don't get passed any more
Aaron Martinez
spoiler alert:
they dont
Joseph Nelson
abortion is so last week hehe
David Brown
Inb4 SCOTUS judges suddenly die.
Ryan Cook
basically administrative law went parabolic in the 30s for many reasons like aviation, cars, industrial technologies, drugs, the complexities of a big society.
Naturally leaders around the world did not manually reviewed each thing, imagine roosvelt manually writting the air travel regulations.
That would be too complicated and retarded, but the problem is that while that was well back then most of this fucking agencies in EVERY COUNTRY keep inventing bullshit to expand, so the agency in charge of regulating drugs ends up wanting to regulate vitamins, the agency in charge of regulating banks ends up freezing bank accounts just to fullfil a retarded quota against money laundering.
The taxman says your crypto is a currency and you must pay capital tax, the sec says it's a commodity, the central bank fud against your gains and says it's not a currency or a commodity but you must still capital gains for the lulz.
The description with crypto above could be fixed by having politicians do their fucking job and write the laws.
But instead we are in a position were the politicians don't do their fucking jobs in every democratic countries and regulatory agencies do whatever the fuck they want.
Shit like civil forfeiture is fucking insane, in the usa the biggest cash bill in 1970 was the 10k usd bill, and a NEW house was 20k usd, so inflation adjusted it was worth almost 250k usd.
Meanwhile now they arrest people for having more than 10k usd in cash because some retarded regulations that agencies that nobody polices do.
It's happening in every fucking country worse administrative law has the "funny trick" that does not gives you free legal representation but you must sue to oppose something, so rich people and poor are under different systems.
This is one of the main reasons companies keep getting concentrated more and more, since regulatory capture does not allows for new players to get in.
That is not to say there should not be regulations.
Noah Evans
The USA has 10 intelligence agencies, we can afford to lose most of them really.
Jack Howard
You can already enslave people in the United States. It's called the prison system.
Aaron Roberts
BOSS NIGGER
Sebastian Nguyen
This is not about glowies it is mostly about the regulatory agencies dealing with the economy, glowies that have their range well assigned won't have any problem.
This is a bigger problem and it's happening in every country with a democratic style government because this fucking regulations are not legislated or debated or anything.
Jaxon Stewart
Brandon Ross
>Such a ruling could also potentially imperil the ability of any federal agency to regulate any industry.
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
MAKE THE FEDERAL GOV'T ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
Jordan Edwards
We can't afford to keep any of them.
Logan Martin
Ruth has to watch from Hell as Clarence puts an end to her legacy.
Eli King
>BOSS NIGGER
The Duke of Washington DC's new car.
Jose Torres
I hope the ruling guts more than just delegation and cuts the balls off of the commerce clause as a whole.
As in, rather than just eliminating the EPA, ATF, FDA, et cetera, eliminate the 1964 Civil Rights Act and all the other shit the government has done in violation of the 10th Amendment for the past hundred fifty years.
Austin Miller
You have to go back. And stay there
Elijah Bell
So? Congress should have to review and approve all agency rules before they can go into effect. Even if it is just a rubber stamp of their rules in toto. Doing this every 2 years or so would make for a much more stable business environment.
Connor Lewis
believe it or not the us 13th ammendment allows forced prison work, but the us founding fathers really tried to put the seeds to ban slavery.
The phrase "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness", was originally life, libery and property but they reallized it would cause a shitstorm in the future due to slaves being property so they changed it for the pursuit of happiness.
Isaac Gonzalez
You’re welcome
Jacob Bailey
That’s the biggest ruling maybe ever.
I’m scared for them.
Camden Cooper
go back to where r*ddit?Fuck that
Anthony Collins
YOU ALL DOUBTED BASED NIGGER
YOU ALL SAID HE WOULDN'T DO SHIT
Adam Reed
> Ummm...ackshuwally sweetie, you already do enslave people in the United States. It's called the prison system!
Jose Lopez
>SUPREME COURT EXPECTED TO RULE WITHIN SATURDAY ON WHETHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ACTUALLY HAVE ANY POWER OVER US STATES:
the answer will be that they do.
Not sure why scotus needs to take this one; it's obvious
Charles Taylor
The Civil Rights Act was actually passed by Congress. I don't believe it could be touched in this ruling. However maybe it should be struck down.
James Mitchell
>>Such a ruling could also potentially imperil the ability of any federal agency to regulate any industry.
No regulation could be a disaster!
Prices would drop, quality would go up and americans would be making products domestically.
OY VEY! IS ANUDDAH SHOAH!
Elijah Ward
>whores, fags, glows, baby killers, gun grabbers