Why is Any Forums anti-abortion?

Why is Any Forums anti-abortion?

Attached: D4B873B7-1999-4384-A3B9-5C5373D02C40.jpg (827x776, 169.91K)

Whoever says I was?

Attached: OP's ass is smelly.jpg (1280x720, 94.5K)

Why didn't legal abortion stop orphan bastards?

Attached: Nonmarital_Birth_Rates_in_the_United_States,_1940-2014 (1).png (954x453, 85.51K)

My opinion on abortion is so simple it’s one sentence long.

If you use abortion in the place of contraception and birth control you’re a piece of shit.

If I'm on the opposite side of Richard Spencer then I know that I'm right.

Big-brain take.
Fuck christfags.
Abort that fetus, shaneequa

>Slave morality worries about whether something is good or bad
>Master morality worries about whether something is good or bad

I don't think this guy knows what either of these terms means.

>If you use abortion in the place of contraception and birth control you’re a piece of shit
... and thus should not breed.

It's been amazing to watch, over the last few days; how the botmeisters and politanons have tried to craft a message which doesn't have the dem still losing big.

So on day 1 there was the "if you're against abortion, that means more black people" posts. Then you had the "if you're against abortion, you're not a "real racist"

And now this, which looks like a "if you're against abortion, you're the same mentally as black people".

It still amazes me how quickly the left adopt their old racism when the need requires.

Yeah. If your abortions are elective they should come with a free tube tying.

I'm just loving all those mental juggling with semantics they're doing just to make killing babies something moral.
They got so low to even use those fallacious argument.
>bro, are you against abortion?
>if you're against abortion that means you support slavery
>and that makes you racist
>...don't forget I know where you live and work, bro
>so... are you against abortion?

because fighting niggers is easier than fighting the demons summoned by abortions

Attached: 1651077829758.jpg (2022x1559, 412.98K)

Imagine not passing on your genes because of society.

That's retarded. Making whoring have consequences puts pressure on women to not be a whore.
Also end welfare.

Because I like destroying the lives of leftists.

"hey let's kill children and sacrifice them to the economy"
>why are there Any Forums users against this
OP are you, dare I say, retarded?

Because fetuses are humans and killing humans is wrong and should be illegal.

That being said, I don't even feel THAT strongly about this issue, but it's funny watching hoes get mad.

It encouraged riskier behavior and fucking among people that didn't want to get married or stick around for a child. It was seen as a contraception instead of as a last resort for purely medical or eugenic reasons.
The problem with allowing it is that if you allow a little, you allow it all, If there's no shame in getting it because you can't afford to take care of a baby (Physically, mentally, or financially), then there's no shame in any abortion, but instead of people taking the responsible route and either taking measures to avoid pregnancy (Vasectomies, tubes tied, IUDs, abstinence) people just go "I'll just get an abortion, that's easier and I don't have to worry about it now." which enables a permanent childhood mindset of fun all the time, worry about it later, and no real consequences, and it evades starting a family, instead of having a child, a meaningful spouse, and a stable household, it's just fucking around, aborting, repeat.

So instead of the few out of wedlock getting abortions, it ended up making it the many out of wedlock getting some of the abortions.

Because 99% of people here want to larp as nazi christian puritans

>t. uneducated underclass retard

I’m pro-restricting-women.

Over what time frame is it good or bad for society.
Giving an out to peronalities that cant control themselves is like the dole for useless cunts.

Consequences are eugenic

Attached: 1656305952792.jpg (720x572, 28.12K)

No, the retard frames it correctly. Slave morality is all about good vs evil, while master morality is all about good vs bad. The error he makes is in how he frames the argument, as one could take either stance on abortion. Leftists tend to frame abortion about the evil of taking autonomy away from women, and the right can take the stance that murdering children diminishes the nation's population, which is bad. And frankly, no liberal and very few people on the left wing think that way anyways.

>make killing babies something moral.
Killing the right kind of people is based fucking retarded christcuck.

I'm not. Abortion is the number one nigger killer in the US. That said, bitches just need to get on BC regardless. They really should have male birth control available.

he got it right

worrying about what is "best for society" is not master morality

Are they saying we should kill all orphans and bastards. God damn the party of tolerance is very cruel

>worrying about what is "best for society" is not master morality
It is, blue-collar retard.

what about forcing men to pay for children they don't want? i don't care about abortion at all. all i want is the right to choose to be a father or not. i don't want to pay child support for 18 years because i cummed in a slut. men should have the right to opt out. it is our turn. women had a choice for years, not it's men's turn. ban abortion and also give men the right to choose. my semen, my choice.

Not anti anything. Just that life is sacred.
It's apriori of anything else.

cringe take
anti-abortion is life-affirming
pro-abortion is life-denying

get your niezschecringe outta here pseud

I am pro abortion for women on welfare and deformed/retarded babies

>get your niezschecringe outta here pseud
>t. asshurt christfag coping about his jew-religion being burried 150 years ago by a polish schizo.