>Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger - who was in charge of Capitol security on January 6 and blamed 'professional agitators' - dies suddenly, hours before today's surprise hearing moved out of 'safety concerns' for Mark Meadows' top aide
Move along citizen nothing to see here.... ;D
Other urls found in this thread:
dailymail.co.uk
twitter.com
k
He was 71
k-keep me posted
yes nothing to see goy, just died of old age
They just straight up kill anyone that disagrees with them.
Wow what a misfortune
The guy blamed everyone for his own organization’s failure. He wanted to suggest that the right had “professional agitators” (like the Proud Boys) rather than his accept fault for his bad leadership and lack of preparedness. Why would the Left kill him when he has been on record blaming Right wing extremist groups?
Riiiiight
To be fair, they're in the midst of consolidating total control over the federal government and its various agencies after their Reichstag Fire.
Can't let some honest chief of security fuck that up.
Woops posted the wrong link;
dailymail.co.uk
Naive jungle Asian, very naive!
HAHA
>Sergeant-at-arms; "I Have have new evidence for next weeks hearing...."
>committee members; "WEEE need to reschedule, sorry!"
>Dies
>committee; "We're closing the committee into the events... bye!"
Against the narrative, they actually fear trump winning again now he is running again. (things are about to get very dirty to ridge the next election.)
classic
>dies suddenly
did he have the jaberinos?
Fuckery afoot.
not as old as u are trying to make it seem
If he called himself holocaust survivor he'd be 101.
Joe Biden is 79. What is your point?
which side were most afraid of his testimony? never heard of this goy
meant for
>old man dies at 71 in 2022
>pol: It’s either the jab or Killary
You guys are such psyop faggots it’s unbearable
Point to EXACTLY where he said he had any kind of evidence that Jan 6 was anything other than a MAGA insurrection
>guy that agrees with Dems and testifying only helps them dies
If you are going to make an assassination argument the only argument that makes sense is right leaning people killed him
They don’t know and it doesn’t ultimately matter. They’re just trying to create a narrative around his death that hints at something nefarious. It doesn’t have to make sense. It’s a PsyOp.
>the dems and the news are putting on a false, phony hearing to push their lies about Trump
>they also don’t have full control about who testifies at their sham hearings - they have to KILL people that they think threaten their phony trial…instead of you, just not having them testify.