Is beauty objective or subjective?

Is beauty objective or subjective?

Attached: 20220625520.jpg (4096x3243, 1.86M)

There’s an objective foundation base. And then there’s a subjective upper layer.

/thread

Correct answer, end of thread. THANK YOU COME AGAIN!!

1, 2, 3 in that order.
but who is 1?

I would say that if one is physically fit and mentally intelligent, then beauty is really subjective on the dominant people of that time. Today , European features have become a standard of beauty. It may very well change when the centre of power shifts from "white" countries. Sadly, India has to work on proper nutrion and exercise along with high standards of education like the East Asian nations did after their economy improved. Islamic invaders + British our education, literacy rate , then the latter starved us for 2 centuries. And then of course, to blame India, we opted for ultra socialism which really crippled our economy for 5 decades.

Caucasian women are the prettiest.
Slavic women are apex though.

British *destroyed our literacy rate

Aren’t they all Jews in this picture

Beauty is just a synonym for advertising

We will always be the most beautiful, it’s just science. Blue and green, features against light skin vs all poop and piss colors

Attached: 8750532A-500A-4374-AF9F-D846C92BC5D7.png (1024x507, 531.84K)

This is the mind trap of the typical American; the hightest and most noble icons of human beauty are from the vile rats nest of fucking evil jews in Hollywood. They can no more imagine any other standard than they can conceive of the distance between earth and it's nearest neighboring star.

Attached: 1656382750818-1.jpg (1001x1024, 303.21K)

Kek, i just praised how the European and "white" countries have been dominant for 3 centuries and now here comes a mutt who can't fathom a simple logic like it is. Perhaps you also believe the Germans/Nordics are Aryans ?

number one is monica bellucci so

>We will always be the most beautiful
The average white man doesn't look nothing like that picture. A lot of whiteys cope with these kinds of images.

It's so funny.

>It may very well change when the centre of power shifts from "white" countries
i cant see this happening anytime soon. western countries just seem to be where everyone wants to be in this day and age india has so many things wrong with it thats its impossible to be taken seriously in this day and age i cant see changing anytime soon

>Kek, i just praised how the European and "white" countries have been dominant for 3 centuries and now here comes a mutt who can't fathom a simple logic like it is. Perhaps you also believe the Germans/Nordics are Aryans ?
Don't think too much, he's just a fat bastard and his ass is red from sitting too much.

Bro, they're hot. There's nothing more to it.
> the hightest and most noble icons of human beauty are from the vile rats nest of fucking evil jews in Hollywood.
False.

It gave a compiled average face of that group. So obviously we're not all clones.

How long do you think anytime soon is ? For example take a view from civilization long period. After the fall of Roman empire Europe went into a dark age for more than 1200 years. Then too , Roman empire was not the richest or more powerful than indian or chinese civilizations and empires. Now Europe and its descendant nations have become superpowers for some 3 centuries. China has risen again and i can see india rising to USA and China's economy in 4-5 decades more or less. Is 5 decades really that long if we see how empires can last centuries ?

One on the left over the other two all day long.

jennifer connelly>>>>

>The average white man doesn't look nothing like that picture
Literally the most ironic statement possible

Is this some sort of Indian-flavored copium?