>In her majority opinion, O'Connor wrote that "race-conscious admissions policies must be limited in time," adding that the "Court expects that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today."
Does that mean that SCOTUS can kill AA in 2028?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
SCOTUS can, and will, kill it this week.
The SCOTUS is sovereign or a front whoever is sovereign in this country. They can do whatever they want within reason.
Being a woman she naively assumed niggers would assimilate eventually.
Killing AA will also harm women, so you'd have both niggers and white women out for blood
fuck o'connor
thanks again reagan you piece of shit
It would piss off everyone in the US except heterosexual, non-jewish, non-muslim, White men.
Are there any AA cases circling the lower courts?
asians hate aa because they don't benefit from it
They're not waiting until 2028, they're going to kill it off in October.
en.wikipedia.org
They don't benefit from it when they apply to college, but they benefit from it in workplace hiring and promotions and when applying for government contracts, grants, etc.
>Ketanji Brown Jackson stated prior to becoming a Supreme Court Justice that she would recuse herself from the case because she is on the Harvard Board of Overseers.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA they're FUCKED
Yes, its a matter of time. I thought it was on the docket this year actually but I’m guessing they kicked it down. It will be another 6-3 decision.
Tbf she voted 3.5 - 1 on the "conservative" - "liberal" axis.
get rid of the 1965 immigration act as soon as possible
>it must be limited in time
That's a pretty shit opinion. That's like saying rape is okay as long as the man doesn't take too long to finish.
Asians are taking a Harvard admission case to Supreme Court in fall, I believe.
This. Give us western Europeans the chance to make the US great again.
and asians.
Has nothing to do with SCOTUS.
Oh no no no. It just keeps on getting better!