Whats the point of 300k nato troops if we will use nukes the first day if it actually happens...

>He thinks the war stops after the nukes land

Gotta put all that NBC gear to use before there's no one left to use it user

*THE ukraine

It's not who he is, it's what they're doing. Escalation is the Russian strategy and people here are batshit insane. We're looking at developing another Cuban crises because of these shitheads politicians from both sides.

We will get glassed before you can even pick up your rifle. Don't worry just live your life it's not like we can do much against it

The point is a proxy war where we meat grinder each other in Belarus or something.
None of our countries can produce a deployable force that large anyway, zoomers are all on drugs or too fat to be eligible and many countries are now broke and have abandoned military funding for so long it's impossible

What is it with all these based Ukrainians lately? Based af user.

if russia invades a NATO country conventionally they will probably just remove them conventionally, but I have no idea.

You have no choice the american were going to put missiles on your doorstep and lets not even mention the bio labs in Georgia and Ukraine or the attempted orange revolution in Kazahkstan in 2019

JewS of A has a first strike doctrine and Russian law states that any missile fired by Nato against Russia will be retaliated with a mass nuclear strike.
youtu.be/7SnTkc0r6gk

I dont see de-escalation happening anytime soon from this side either. I've witnessed how sensitive that bitch Ursula is to social media posts. Boris jonson is a bit more pragmatic, but he is a lost puppy on a short leash. Biden is just fucking gone, his handlers are the Amrican banks. All his decisions are based on bank mandates. Poland is just stupid. Lithuania is just stupid. Finland and Sweden are reluctant partners.

The entire point of Ukraine is its going to lose but its going to lead Russia as much as possible. The big disappointment is the lack of immediate economic damage to Russia.

The 300k is not meant to win its meant to pick up small opportunities to make Russia suffer in blood and treasure.

Can we just level the fuckin Kremlin already?

you and i are in agreement somewhat. it all points to the banks.

You can put a missile in my fucking room, both countries have guaranteed response it doesn't matter if those missiles are in Ukraine or ND unless you're willing open the pandora box, doom tens of millions of your own people to death and tender much of your territory inhabitable and got knows what else. And all of this for what?

>This makes me think that this is a signal to Russia that nato
as if US and co. wouldn't like increased military spending, especially if Europoors will pay for it and will a significant number of meat

Spasi, Gospodi lyudi tvoya i blagoslavi dostayaniye tvoye!
Pobedui boriushchimsya za veru pravuiu i za svyatuiu Rus!
I Tvoe sokhranyaya Krestom Tvoim zhitel’stvo!

Attached: GettyImages-478989838.jpg (1800x1200, 148.87K)

>render uninhabitable

>thinks nukes are real

they are not going to lose. Russia lost at least 5,000 men dead + thousands more Donbass citizens to take a small city in the eastern border in 4 months. At this rate there will be no men in Russia before they can take Ukraine.

>JewS of A has a first strike doctrine
Not just first strike, but preemptive first strike. In other words they reserve the right to strike first with no warning whatsoever if they -feel- threatened.

>Whats the point of 300k nato troops if we will use nukes the first day if it actually happens?
Blood sacrifice to Moloch.

>The only logical response from russia would be to mobilize 600k troops in Kaliningrad and Belarus
They're running out of people they can actually mobilize.

Attached: 1633124208763.png (1203x1200, 849.92K)