So why is abortion a 10th, but ccw liscence is not a violation of 2nd?

So why is abortion a 10th, but ccw liscence is not a violation of 2nd?

Attached: dead_nigs.jpg (510x680, 113.27K)

What do you mean? CCW is now a guaranteed right.

still have to get loisance
nor was there any, lol it just words bro going after the nfa as there was being gay and contraceptives

"The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

>still have to get a license
Do you?
Look up what the punishment is.
I'll happily do the time and pay the fine if it means me and mine will be just fine.
Besides, ideally the only person who would be saying anything about the visibility of my weapon will be dead anyhow.

yep
The rulings are at odds.
the 10th says aboprtion is state, until it conflicts with 1st
And the 2nd establishes no precedent for ccw actually, witht he frist ccw laws being done by the goys who wrote the constitution altogether
Which I ignore for my life as I like ccw

Just as its established the 1st covers running a christian flag outside a government building, it also there fore shall cover abortion as a jewish religius right


Which really just says the cult of gun needs to be the religion of more gun

>And the 2nd establishes no precedent for ccw actually,
It actually does. The part.
To keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.
Says nothing about the visibility of said arms. And until there is a constitutional amendment specifically stating a loicense is required_ it is not.

the issue is the first ccw laws were written by the same goys who wrote that
So its rather clear the answer is no
They wrote on it that only brigands and neer dowells would ccw
Respectable men would openly brandish to demonstrate they have no intent on harm

Same reason broadswords and great swords were popular, but daggers got you executed for possession
Showing you are armed makes it easy to know intent, while ccwing means you intend evil as defense doesnt need you to ccw

Or for modern, see that cops dont ccw, they have it nice and open on their hips tempting every starbuckers to show just what happens when they grab it over their pumpkin chai latte

The second amendment is the only amendment where they have to pretend like they have no idea what "shall not be infringed' means.

And people just let it happen

You're odd....just in general it seems. Not a slight mind you. Do me a favor and vocaroo your post. Try to read it as naturally as possible. I'm curious about something. Please.

Its also the only one with the word necessary in it. I mean, there is no doubt in my mind that the 2nd is by far THE most important one. Just wondering why it wasn't first. I would have made it the first amendment.
Maybe speech and religion was more oppressed than weapons at the time. My guess anyway.

I hold that since people are fighting back over Oklahoma wanting a vasectomy law, saying its satanic and demonic becuase it keeps a baby from being born, the real goal is to just make an anger sacrifice battery for moloch
IE, rather than torturing people, farm the suffering and offer it as a sacrifice on an industrial farm sort of deal

Its even funnier how the traitorous supereme court that didnt stop the steal and needed to be evicted with violence is now all based and no, we never wanted violence on them
Even funnier is ted cruz bitching over dems saying its 9 unelected judges, but oddly not over copyright or plagarism
I have no idea what that is, please explain

This is nonsense
Back then it was safe to assume everyone was armed, all the time.

>ccw liscence is not a violation of 2nd?
It literally is. The win of a battle can still be celebrated even if the war isn't over yet.

"To keep and BEAR arms" says nothing of the manner in which the arms are allowed to be beared. You're argument is retarded. Other user is correct. Until an amendment says otherwise no licence is required to carry a firearm concealed or unconcealed. You can stuff an ak47 in your pant leg if you like, for example.

Go to vocaroodot com. Its a quick platform to record audio clips. And now we also know you are a very newfren. How did you find this place?

>ccw liscence is not a violation of 2nd?
it is a violation of the 2A, so is the NFA, and GCA
now fuck off

By me it's like 15 years mandatory minimum for carrying without a permit. Huge step up from the same thing with 0 possibility of ever getting the permit desu. So, happy with crumbs for now. Eventually will want meat tho

Just move to Texas lmao

its because the amendments came in the order of people game theorying things out afterwards
>okay so thats nice n all, but where do we get to air our grieances? Like thats why we did all this
Oh right good idea, lets add that down, freedom of speech, religion, and such to keep anyone from blocking it
>Well, I mean blocking how? Like we need some teeth or theyll just go to jail forever like George did
Good idea, we should make sure they have guns to keep them safe while airing grievances
>Oh hey if we're on that, can we say no fucking putting troops in my damn house?
Sure
>Back to that jail thing, we should also make sure that they cant be searched constantly instead, oh and they cant implicate themselves by speaking
Done and done
>trials too, we want to make sure here
Right, jury, speedy trial, done by their peers, good ideas man
>Cap on punishments?
OOh good idea, Ill also add they cant abrogate these
Anything else?
>nah senpai, just say anything else goes t o the states, I t hink they can work it out

Those issues aren't related. Abortion or even anything related to medicine or childbearing is not specifically mentioned anywhere in the constitution so the 10th definitely applies. Guns are definitely mentioned in the constitution so there may be some basis through kikery for the federal government to make gun laws.

Attached: 1653714700200.jpg (653x602, 53.79K)

90 days 1000 dollar fine is max here. Wa.

I fail to see how this ruling doesn't also mean every state is now an open carry as well.

>establishes no precedent
10 says if no precedent is established, it’s a state decision.

Im asking for a website, just write it out
Surely if you think youve been here longer you can do that.
I find it safe to do so now
Im armed, so should everyone else be
The fact theres people whining theeir rights are being removed, yet dont want guns confuses me and makes me have the jewish thoughts on their recency of rectal medical consumption
Open carry?
Thats rewording constitutional carry, you gotta be able to move t hose guns openly somehow, and carrying them is kinda key
anything can be religious
my desire to purge jews is holy catholic tradition and practicing my religion