Is this madman gonna do it?
Digits say he will
God, I hope so
FUUUUUUUUUUUCK
Greece is the word.
fuck that race-traitor house nigger sellout.
Αποκαλείς αυτό ψηφία? Παρατήρησε κάποια αληθινά ψηφία αλάνι
It's totally possible, and if the court maintains its composition for the next 2 years, it might even be probable.
Nope. Why would gay marriage be unconsitutional? It makes my stomach turn to see two men cuddling on each other, but unless people are hurting other people, why should I hate it and want it stamped out? It literally doesn't affect me. It actually reduces the dating pool for women.
Think the next thing is the EPA getting fucked on
>muh CO2
It's a slippery, slippery slop senpai.
>It's totally possible
How? I just don't see how it could be constitutional. He's conservative, but definitely objective.
Shut the fuck up feggot.
I'm a right winger and I love black people. I love niggers most of all. I want to let a nigger have sex with my wife. Evil democrats are the real racists.
The slippery slope concept is literally a well-known logical fallacy. Slippery slope to what and for whom? The rest of the world could turn gay, and I wouldn't be interested in it still.
Because marriage shouldn't be recognized by the state in the first place, but if it is, it is up to the STATES to decide on who gets to be married - not the federal government. There's really nothing in the Constitution that says you deserve access to marriage, which means it gets kicked back to local powers. Why should every city or state recognize gay marriage? Or marriage between humans and other animals like dogs? Or between humans and inanimate objects? They just reinterpreted the already shit interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, bro. Everything is on the table now. Deal with it.
Ad-hom, the last resort of someone incapable of verbal intercourse.
Why someone who is not voted by the people haves more power than the president?
leftoids gave them power by using it to create laws about faggot shit out of nothing.
respect the effort
Don't vote for federal representatives that are going to allow Supremes in that you don't want. Maybe get away from the party system in general. Voting blocs are for faggots.
leads to garbage that we have now, pride parades with naked men dancing with children in the streets, drag queen story hour, etc.
Pedos are living the dream thanks to everyone normalizing degeneracy
>The slippery slope concept is literally a well-known logical fallacy. Slippery slope to what and for whom?
For the children you fucking retard, they are mighty impressionable.
Also, going from decriminalize homosexuality and allows us to marry to naked men sticking dildos in their asses in front of small children on the so called parades and to mandatory school homosexual and tranny curriculum is slippery slope par excellence.
He already did it. Single-handly killed white race in America
>marriage shouldn't be recognized by the state in the first place
Agreed.
>up to the states
why would they kick out taxpayers for that? That's what'd end up happening.
If they stopped recognizing marriage altogether and allowing it to change taxation status, none of this bullshit would even be a public issue. The real problem is health insurance. Fags want to have cheap healthcare. Medicine is an evil, greedy entity.
If you wish to be a gay ho, into jail you go.
Rolling
>Deal with it.
You little kids always think on 'them or me' terms. Discussion about faggot rights and not caring about marriage between anyone doesn't equal faggot support, you autistic little cunt.
Im surprised abortion went before "gay marriage" at least there is an argument FOR abortion but they can't even prove that "gay marriage" even exists.
Fags will be lucky if they get out of this without being round up and massacred in camps. We've had just about enough of their degenerate perverted sick shit, their time is coming.
Gay marriage is not protected by the constitution, you can't just keep making up rights for what it covers.
Nope, he wouldn’t have the votes.
Plus implementation would cause too much issue and expense for the nation as a whole.
I hate fags, but I’m smart enough to know what sort of financial and legal consequences would befall countless businesses and institutions as a result of a gorillion marriages suddenly being nullified. The arbitration costs involved with various forms of insurance and other things with marriage as a key component would be billions in itself.
Simply not worth it.
It literally has nothing to do with it being unconstitutional.
It’s the same principle as roe. It should have never been decided upon at the federal level to begin with. It’s neither constitutional nor unconstitutional at the federal level, because it hasn’t ever been legislated at the federal level.
With no federal legislation, SCOTUS isn’t supposed to have an opinion either way. Such matters are meant to be decided on at the state level by state legislators and courts.
It's more important if scotus overruled the new gun bill shit. Degens can be dealt with on the go
GOD WILLS IT
After 50 years the fraud and deceit of Roe v Wade foisted by Jews on the American people came crashing down. Only more good things are to come from this strict constitutionalist court.
>they kick out taxpayers for that
Why have broad tax systems in the first place?
I'm 38, bro. Marriage is a covenent before god or maybe - at a stretch - your tribe. The government shouldn't have shit to say about it. If two faggots wants to put a ring on it and my God/ tribe want to tell them to fuck right off, the legal processes we all live under should be able to accommodate that. Even with inflated kike stats, most states have people in them that don't want to live next to homos.
Time to kneel
Hating faggots is selling out to the white man now, nigger ?
The loud annoying fag attention whoring is because
A) you can't make it illegal
B) it's disgusting, so normal people try to keep it hidden.
Give them the cities. They're garbage, anyway. Let all the fags migrate to cities and live the degenerate lives they want to live. Why do you care? If they're all ghettoed, we know where to avoid. If you want it to stop, you either have to stop pushing back altogether or kill them all, which won't happen, no matter how much better an option it is. Ejection isn't gonna happen, either. It's also jewish media forcing it down your throat.
>going from decriminalize homosexuality and allows us to marry to naked men sticking dildos in their asses in front of small children on the so called parades
There can still be obscenity laws. Anyone who does this should be punished violently.
>homo and tranny training
Happens around 12 years old, same as they teach sex ed. Had I learned about homosex at twelve, I still wouldn't have been interested, even if my friends wanted to. I knew what I liked before 5.
Look at those Psycho-Jesus eyes.
Fag marriage is the only thing saving the west now. Roasties are seething because they have to compete with hot twinks. Also: twinks can’t get pregnant.
This is what worshipping Satan does to your brain.
so you assume we should hide homos entirely and pretend they don't exist? When should kids be told the truth? It's a fact of life. It won't go away. If you killed every single one of them today and sunk them into the ocean, new ones would pop up again.