Can anyone honestly provide me with an argument against abortion? 24 weeks should be the cut off date...

Can anyone honestly provide me with an argument against abortion? 24 weeks should be the cut off date, which is 6 months, which is quite enough time to decide, and is also the furthest along a fetus has little chance of viability outside the womb. Prove me wrong.

Attached: 53397D89-C94E-48D9-9093-88F3EC52F5C6.jpg (900x900, 46.28K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/6IzgP67lSSs
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Nigger

Ok
youtu.be/6IzgP67lSSs

a little food for thought: nearly 3/4 of all abortions are simply due to financial insolvency. If we encouraged people to have children through parental leave and benefits and not creating a world where people are raised in abusive and unloving environments, which will lead to an increase in crime, most abortion would not happen.
Besides the
>muh niggers
argument, what are Any Forumss strongest points?

Argument, none really. It mostly hinges on god and having souls and other cringes shit like “the sanctity of life”. I hate normies so abortion is ok by my books because it means less of them.

How about I kick your ass instead you fucking demon

Attached: 157832347541.jpg (426x426, 41.26K)

Understandable point, but most miscarriages happen before that 24 week cutoff and while yes there is a tendency to see miscarriage as "the death of a child", this is simply using semantics to justify your point. When it doesn't happen of a woman's own accord, then she'll obviously feel like she lost a child and lost her chance to be a mother and this is where the confusion begins and continues.

You'll have to ask the women why they think it's more morally acceptable to kill a living human being than to just keep your fucking legs closed for more than a day.

>24 weeks should be the cut off date
up to 70% of babies prematurely born at 24 weeks survive, you are killing a viable human at 24 weeks

Any Forums's consensus is that abortion of white kids is wrong but we don't care for any other race, niggers aren't even human.
Now when it comes to the fetus, it's just the earliest stage of life, it's still human. The doesn't have the potential to be anything else, it is going to grow up the same way every human has which means that clump of cells or not it's still a distinct person in its early forming stages

Try telling a girl that her miscarriage wasnt her child dying, and shes freaking out over semantics.
Holy shit you out of touch zoomer.

>Can anyone honestly provide me with an argument against abortion?
The word abortion is enough. You should not abort human life. If you believe that fetus is nothing then you don't have to abort anything.

If you seriously look at fetal viability outside of the womb, it gets drastically lower the earlier in the pregnancy you go, and that 24 week cutoff is there for a reason. Again, that's 6 months, and before then, most feti are not developed enough to survive or live without being severely physically retarded.

>is simply using semantics to justify your point.
By that logic, semantics is also used to pretend that you're not killing a child, yes? The door goes both ways, so its down to the inconvenience of a child or the state it will be in that's the question, but not the way people are willing to frame it

I hate this half-assed eugenic argument. If you want good human matter, outright ban the lumpen from having kids instead of illogically decreeing that when females get rid of their kids it's good because they will not be cared for nicely but also it's forbidden to extend that line of thought elsewhere.

>human life

>outright ban the lumpen from having kids
Good luck with that

Abortion is a sin & its wrong.

This reminds me of another retarded point: the blind trust in postivism but ONLY in the case of abortion. Otherwise you have to think about muh human rights which just became real once again.

Attached: 1644344524174.jpg (680x680, 119.08K)

>Can anyone honestly provide me with an argument against abortion?

Most babies don't want to be murdered

A motherfucking near-medieval China could control births but not current states? Your point is just half-assed, nothing more.

>semantics is also used to pretend that you're not killing a child, yes?
I'm not using semantics, I'm using pretty basic understanding of biology to argue my point that life does not begin at conception.

Maybe because those are living human beings, citizens of the state deserving rights and respect?
Just saying....

That is a pretty valid argument, I may have read statistics wrong, but it's still around that cutoff point

One decides to be pregnant or not before she gets cummed into. If she does want the man cumming in her to the father of her children and be in a committed relationship she should not let him cum in her. If she absolutely must let him cum in her she should be on birth control pills. How is everyone so stupid and ungrateful?

>living human beings

Attached: 38B5DE9A-BB6C-4AC7-96E1-33CBDAF9E322.jpg (536x750, 80.92K)

Given that life isnt understood and given that the process begins from the moment of conception
It is incumbent on every female to be responsible for their own actions and be the gatekeepers of their own lives
Its been far to easy for women who cast off personal responsibility to blame everyone but themselves for their choices

>Can anyone honestly provide me with an argument against abortion?
Just not a fan of dead baby part trafficking, sorry.
I understand you're naive and don't know what's happening underneath.

>christians more concerned with directives from the civil religion than by their own
It never gets any less funnier
Jannies should do something about you however

Then have contraception and birth control on demand with abortion with a 21-24 week cutoff. Sex education for all. Universal parental leave and child benefits. To all the pro-lifers in this thread, you need to extend that pro-life stance to all stages in life. And a refusal to do so creates a dysgenic society.

> jewish golem ramblings
No thanks

Father here, first time knocking up my wife ended in a miscarriage. One perceives the baby as a human person and alive. It’s painful when you know they wont be born and things you got or made will never be held by that human. It takes awhile before you can try again and the process moves along enough that ones focus shifts to the new baby.

>the process begins from the moment of conception
Then would you say a fetus at 14 weeks can survive outside of the womb? This is the crux of the whole debate, where exactly a fetus can be said to survive outside of the womb, which is about a 21-24 week window.

>Can anyone honestly provide me with an argument against abortion?
Discussing abortion is just a distraction. Stop lapping up the milk just because it is there, and instead, actually consider if it is poisonous and who spiked it.

Attached: 1644351084451.jpg (759x771, 655.92K)

I have never experienced this thankfully, it sounds like quite the harrowing experience. I'm not afraid to die myself, but still struggle with grief.. having to grieve before meeting someone must hurt in such a unique way.

I did have a friend, and granted she thought she was sterile, when she had miscarriage early in a pregnancy she didnt even know she had, it still completely fucked her mentally for a bit, and doomed (well, it's never just one thing) her relationship at the time.

That's why this fucking kills me. All these women demanding "rights" to remove "parasites".. my God.. were so out of touch if that is common and accepted language..

I'm sorry for your loss FatherAnon. I hope it was just a painful storm upon the sea of life, a storm takes are spun from, but a storm gone past regardless. All the best, friend.