Why are Russian aircraft so bad?
Why are Russian aircraft so bad?
Jace Sanders
Other urls found in this thread:
nitter.net
twitter.com
Joshua Martinez
>removes a whole bunch of losses to SAM's for amerifat planes
sneaky
Camden Bailey
shitty people build shitty stuff
Asher Howard
ukraine is losing territory every day
David Sanders
maybe Lithuania will be denazified next?
Jaxson Rodriguez
To be fair, when Russian planes fight, they are mostly flown by retarded brown people.
Nolan Peterson
Apparently Russian planes are being targeted from outside of Uke soil, like from Poland and Rumania by NATO equipment. This factors in quite heavily as to what can be achieved.
Anthony Davis
Pretty much this.
Austin Nelson
Oh yeah that’s true, didnt saddam have hundreds of keys and they all got BTFO on day 1 during the gulf war
Wyatt Sanchez
Are jets even relevant anymore? I mean, of course it depends on the situation, but in an all out war, won't it be a missile fiesta? For that reason, isn't it best to invest into anti missile tech? Pretty sure that Russia's air defenses are solid and why bother wasting fuel and endangering a plane to fire its missiles when you can fire kalibrs and iskandars from safe territory? Just saying...
Nolan Carter
ye, hoping for it
Anthony Scott
the EU is backing off. i think Russia threatened to have Belarus go to war on it if not.
Justin Sullivan
Belarus has like 60k soldiers max, I think the LNR and DNR combined forces are bigger than that
Julian Hernandez
shame
Julian Nguyen
yeah. that way NATO wont intervene. if Russia attacks it might trigger article 5 but if Belarus goes after Lithuania its just a regional conflict.
Connor Watson
99.5% of the F-14 kills are being flown by browns including multiple aces in a day.
Thomas Scott
Stats seem dubious at best. During the Vietnam air, the VNAF and USSR official stats show a 165-63 k/d ratio for Mig 21.
Jeremiah Hughes
Search Internet over Erich Hartmann.
Aiden Adams
Because missile air defense is limited and immobile compared to jets that move faster than sound. Many moving jets using many missiles strategically outclasses any known air defense systems
Ryan Bailey
Leave it to a jew to think of this possibility.
Luke Cruz
>i'm dumb
Daniel Smith
You will never have a real victory. You have no triumphs, you have no honor, you have no accomplishments. You have a failed military twisted by Zionism and the profit motive of the military-industrial complex into a crude mockery of history’s perfection.
All the “support” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your civilian population is disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your failed campaigns behind closed doors.
Guerrillas are utterly unafraid of you. Thousands of years of warfare have allowed guerrillas to sniff out military incompetence with incredible efficiency. Even battles you “won” look fleeting and inconsequential to a guerilla. Your casualty aversion is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to bomb a village, its inhabitants pick up arms the second they gets a whiff of your cowardly, doomed occupation.
You will never be victorious. You beg Congress for additional spending every single year and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the casualty count creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll open negotiations, set a timetable, withdraw, and abandon massive stockpiles of weaponry. The guerrillas will capture your local allies, overjoyed and relieved that they can jail or kill them at will. They’ll drape the capital city with a flag flown by your enemies, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know your military failed there. Your veterans will seethe and go back to homelessness and drug addiction, and all that will remain of your legacy is some Hollywood movies that are unmistakably inaccurate.
This is your fate. This is what AIPAC and Lockheed Martin chose. There is no turning back.