My body my choice my psychedelic

All those hypocrite goddamn blue ticks on twitter brainwashing women with "autonomy over their body" on full force.
Meanwhile %70 world will be locked up in prison for years if they were caught with literal plants and chemicals safer than anything in mcdonalds: marijuana, psilocybin, dmt and lsd and thousands of other substances the goddamn UN bans and adds to their list. This is much valid reason to riot and burn it all down.

Attached: terry.jpg (764x438, 116.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heracleum_mantegazzianum
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

kill every drug user

You drink coffee user?

no.

I concur, based turk

Drug prohibition is racism, prescription gateway keeping is classic

Get rid of both

do you eat cheese?

Your own body produces illegal drugs.

drugs make the worst kind of human

In first world countries the punishment usually doesn't fit the crime, or even the written laws, it's simply a matter of money (the harshest punishments listed are rarely handed out, because they cost more money to do so). Someone arrested with a couple grams of shrooms isn't going to jail where I live, probably won't even be fined, just sent to the drunk tank for being high - unless something crazier happened, like they got in a car accident while high on mushrooms, or had a large quantity on them like a 1/2 oz. etc.

yeah but is it good for you?

well it is my body isn't it? who asked you? why does government care what plants i can or can not cultivate at my garden? why does government has a say what plants i can eat? also "drugs" is such a retarded term, shrooms or mescaline or lsd can be a holy experiences and can produce the most fearless brave people you can witness, and a lot of breakthroughs in science and tech is made under the influence of psychedelics. on the other hand meth or coke probably creates those worst humans you think of. are we to call them all "drugs" and chimp against all of them forever? even if someone wants to do hard drugs, who are we or government to decide it can not be done? btw most illicit drug trades are controlled by the governments and cia anyway. also, the federal government turns a blind eye to huge psychedelic use in silicon valley, do you know why? because their software and tech makes them money, a lot of it. but god forbid UN can't let those poor folk in the 3rd world countries to have some shrooms, or they can't let chinese factory workers take acid cuz you know they might realize how retarded all this charade is and they might stop packing plastic shit that nobody actually needs. the overworked japanese sure can't chill with some legal weed. they need to coffee up and design those goddamn digital cameras and playstations and then drink alcohol till oblivion at nights. it is all fucked.

Attached: 271459377_2064280633747322_6063295295554778491_n.jpg (1080x1080, 118.41K)

There are plants that make sense to ban, but not for psychoactive effects.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heracleum_mantegazzianum

sugar is the worst drug, it causes the most slavery

>why does government care what plants i can or can not cultivate at my garden?
because they're slavemasters and they only want you working hard

why would you ban that? looks like something you should plant in city parks in the ghetto

>Discover atropa belladona growing wild on my property
>This is fine.jpeg
>Discover cannabis sativa growing wild on my property
>Face up to 20 years in prison for growing loco weed

It's not about bodily autonomy, it's about government control.

Attached: 1645679400405.jpg (399x600, 38.13K)

Sugar is great!
... when you turn it into alcohol.

...

CTMU + Jesus + Ra Law of One + DMT = The Path

psychedelics are based and redpilled.
i might take 2 hits of lsd soon.

Attached: 1622389369659.jpg (797x960, 166.78K)