BASED

BASED
FAGGOTS ARE NEXT

Attached: file.png (645x323, 80.57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

w... what is she going to do
someone stop bette

>you're next

are we banning gays?

Thomas clarance is the textbook definition of the word based.

Attached: IMG_20220625_004851.jpg (955x1036, 97.4K)

BETTE NO

>Fuck'em all to death
This timeline, guys.

Just try and stop her.

they allow homophobic shit on twitter? it must not be that bad after all, that would be the end of your career on the platform if it was twitter or reddit.

Attached: 1610254543542.png (935x759, 258.22K)

facebook

>Ex gay
>Get boner at the thought of gays being persecuted
If you must hang me too, at least save me for last so I can watch

Attached: 1654297984561.jpg (1024x682, 74.1K)

Who the fuck is better midler? Never once heard of them? Man or woman? Actor?

which one of you did this?

Attached: jhgjhgfhjgf.png (588x316, 37.71K)

I am gay and I work out and am strong as fuck..I could waste any of you pasty fat incels in 2 seconds if wanted.

female actress, this is pottery btw

Attached: bette-midler.jpg (1280x720, 429.91K)

>ex gay
lol ok faggot

based granny is coming for you, sodomites

Attached: 5FF29227-24EC-4F77-91BA-A38A392CEA41.png (798x360, 166.2K)

Not memeing, yes. The gay marriage ruling was based on the same unconstitutional interpretations as RvW and so it will be overturned too. And rightfully so because it's unconstitutional. If they want it legal, pass laws for it. You can't bypass the legislative process.

catboybros

Attached: NICK ACK.jpg (1279x1279, 253.9K)

WHY?.
TAKE A LOOK AROUND
H84U

>if

>The gay marriage ruling was based on the same unconstitutional interpretations as RvW
Can you define how exactly for those of us that don't have a US constitution?

I do not need your acceptance, as Jesus has already forgiven me.

Attached: nft.jpg (696x966, 113.29K)

Bette Midler is going to turn all the faggots into black cats

This. Anons will shit on me for this but I would be in favor for the right to privacy being enumerated. Yes, it means having to put up with whoredom and faggotry, but I also don’t want the government in my fucking business.

The right to unreasonable search and seizure has been broadly regarded as a right to privacy.

PARTY HARD

if if was a fif we would all be stiff, yiff?

Attached: 1655929464676s.jpg (125x113, 2.78K)

It's ok, this all probably ends with few/no laws and probably no legally defined marriage anyway. Just arm yourself and deal with anyone who comes near - the endtimes are coming and they're going to wipe each other out.

stole my line

Gays are in line clamoring for punishment.

Get married and have kids you degenerate.

I truly hope the revoke gay marriage. That would be perfect.

Attached: 27930E59-388A-4576-A6C7-913A086ECB9F.png (962x2048, 1.82M)

you're going to die two weeks after you can't get prep anymore

>Actor?
Worse, a jew

Wouldn't that technically mean you can't deny fagmarriage because
>My private religious beliefs say it's mandatory for xyz reason
>My private life so you can't interfere
Of course you can't force churches to do it under this; much the opposite. But surely this makes it impossible to "ban" them doing their thing in any state.

RvW says you have a constitutional right to privacy, therefore it’s nobodies business what kind of medical procedures you undergo, therefore you can have a federally protected abortion or can marry someone of the same sex. This right to privacy doesn’t actually exist in the United States constitution. I think it should because fuck letting the government in my business but it is factually not a right that we have. Allowing SCOTUS to create rights and laws out of thin air is extremely dangerous since justices serve for life and are not elected. We are talking about giving them absolute power because women are mad and it’s insane to me. If enough people support the right to privacy then we can make an amendment for it and if there aren’t then tough shit, life ain’t fair, and the world goes on.

God I hope so

Attached: 8096CCED-DF69-465A-B660-06048291044D.gif (484x230, 48.01K)

Or you know, something like an interstate highway that freely connects you to---
OH WAIT -- GAS PRICES! SORRY!

Attached: 456764.png (816x158, 32.24K)

I would very much like that. I don’t like abortion, user. But I do understand the importance of having a right to privacy.

>Oh my, oh my, I have found you, nigga
>Don't you run from me, lil' nigga

Attached: 1651293358624.png (1080x1561, 1.49M)

If they keep spreading monkeypox we'll have no choice but to ban them.

Tis Allah manifesting in the americas to dispose his satanic minions.

Allahu Akbar

Attached: drop a faggot 4 allah 2.jpg (615x409, 27.55K)

>This right to privacy doesn’t actually exist in the United States constitution
Fucking kek you guys suck.
Ok no country I live in can legally ban gay marriage cuz we got constitutional privacy rights, phew.
Sucks to be you though, you literally have fewer rights than the UK wtf lmao. Hope you get that though (and then illegalise abortion based on life sanctity laws).

Are we sick of winning yet?

It's called substantive due process, it's a method used by liberal justices to push "rights" that don't exist in the Constitution such as abortion, gay marriage, contraceptive access, sodomy etc. (and yes all of these are real rulings). Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion today states the court should review and remove all of these old rulings based on substantive due process.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

The reasoning for gay marriage being legal is that you have a right to privacy. Therefore the government has no right to dictate what you do in your personal relationships, regardless of who it is with. This right does not actually exist on the books.

so i can inject heroin then?

goatse?

It is what it is. We can write laws codifying this stuff but that takes time and compromise. The left is so mad about this because it means they cannot use SCOTUS to create laws they couldn’t pass through normal means anymore. This is a massive blow to using SCOTUS as a cheat to get bad legislation passed.

i think ppl might beshilling him a little too hard tho. like look at this based black guy. omg i love black ppl now" but he is very fucking based.

You already can in Portland

The US Congress are lazy, corrupt, power-mad assholes. Rights in the US are defined by the US government being restricted from fucking with things because they're considered sacrosanct. Instead of putting their money where their mouths are and pushing for certain things to be enshrined in law, Congress has sat on their hands relying on shaky court decisions that are now falling apart under scrutiny.
Something like that.

Nobody NEEDS high capacity ass-ault gays that can chamber thirty rounds of anal loads and fire off semi automatically hands free!