Why are righties so in love with these actual fucking monsters?
Why are righties so in love with these actual fucking monsters?
>righties
>spics and niggers favorite dog.
user, i...
i love my dogs because they scare faggots like you, whatever you are.
>inb4 poison meatballs
I would physically pull your ears off your skull.
Pitbulls tend to attack nigs and halfrican kids. I have one to protect my backyard from undesirables. I feed him goat entrails.
Maybe it's a regional thing? I live in Indiana and every shitbull owner I know is a vehement con-dumb
Take a day off colleen.
God damn mutts and thinking their bubble represents the entire world. Kys
Lol you ain't gonna do jack shit homie that's why you have le tough man dog
Nobody on this board likes niggerdogs, my tourist friend.
One of 6 illegal dog breeds here.
>liberal
>lives in extremely white area
Your only interaction with niggers is through jewish propaganda. Open your fucking eyes you retard.
Love these mother fuckers they kill babies and women and make everyone seethe
>homie
Cuz they’re pedophiles and zoophiles
Kek'd
>inb4 HE PROBABLY DESERVED IT
I don't recall giving you permission to reply to me.
Gayest bait thread in hours, kike
>I don't recall giving you permission to reply to me
she mad
???
They need to be fuckin killed dude
>my mfw when I drunkenly reply to my own post without realizing it
>indiana
>used the term homie
kys you fucking wigger
He’s a good boy
I hate shitbulls, but the problem is it’s difficult to definitively define what a shitbull is. It’s just one particular variant of bull terrier, and there are dozens of different bull terrier breeds that look incredibly similar but have wildly different behavioural characteristics. Do we ban any dog that just looks like a shitbull? Do we ban any dog with shitbull blood? I just don’t see a feasible way to do it without either banning dog ownership wholesale or leaving massive cracks in the system. And that’s not even getting into the constitutionality argument. Dogs can easily be considered an ‘arm’, at which point banning them would be a violation of the Second Amendment.
I propose an alternative: have ALL dogs be considered corporate with their owners. That is, the crimes committed by a dog are, for legal purposes, to be considered crimes committed by the owner. If your dog mauls someone, then YOU are put on trial for assault with a deadly weapon/negligent discharge/homicide. Further, any dog not on a leash should be considered fair game for good samaritans to put down.
I reckon this would solve 99% of violent dog issues, whilst respecting traditional rights.
Sounds fair to me imo. I don't know why that's not already a thing
based alcoholic
THAT'S HIS SMILING CAGE YOU FUCKIN BIGOT