A man named Gary (((Gross))) took fully nude pictures of a 10 year old Brooke Shields and published them in Playboy...

A man named Gary (((Gross))) took fully nude pictures of a 10 year old Brooke Shields and published them in Playboy magazine in the 1970s. I just don’t understand the mindset of this. I’m a very paranoid person and am terrified about being falsely accused of something. I babysat these kids in high school and I was paranoid that I would be falsely suspected of doing something to them, even though I had a good relationship with all of them, especially the youngest girl. The fact that you could take pictures of a 10 year old girl like this and not forever after be paranoid that everyone is gonna think you’re a pedophile fucking baffles me.

Attached: 0E3F99B7-C8D2-42F5-9C33-54652D940E4A.jpg (612x479, 46.95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Gross
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooke_Shields
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Don’t care. Not my problem.

>(((Gross)))
Based

Attached: Gross_(anime).png (1080x1080, 888.55K)

You still don’t understand how they operate.

Okay groomer

I actually didn't know this. Also not clicking tumbnail

Cool. And the original pictures are where? To validate your claims of course.

I’m not telling you, but here’s an article written about her when she was 12 years old. Hopefully all of your vision is as good as mine.

Attached: A125CC99-E8ED-46EC-BA89-DAD67ACE8ECF.jpg (1170x765, 730.44K)

I censored it.

Fucking crazy. These sick pedophile Jews should burn in hell forever

get me offf of tthis fucckin planete

Sorry, I can't believe claims without proof. Bix nood nigga.

just watch pretty baby

I don't get it either. They don't look feminine or fertile.

I mean the article is right there. Here is Gary Gross’s and Brooke Shield’s Wikipedia pages too if you guys need more proof.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Gross
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooke_Shields

Attached: 57238C9B-B778-4E00-AF32-A459119503F7.jpg (317x479, 41.86K)

Wtf how was this not labelled pornography by the judge wtf it was playboy affiliated fucking disgusting

Google search has uncensored photos, little hat people are filth

We know you're jerking to your post dude.

Answer anyway: kids without father figures (like Brooke S) are easily groomed by kikes.

Seems like it wasn't actually in the magazine but in a book published by "Playboy Press". Not clear if Playboy actually commissioned it or just published it. Looks like they published like 500 shitty looking mainly nonsexual books

But yes still bad

Attached: Screenshot_20220623-222110.png (1080x1366, 1.16M)

Wasn't she like 17 in the blue lagoon? Worth a watch to see her from my old fag recollection.

14

14!

Attached: 34766_ac.jpg (820x546, 64.51K)

if you only knew how many important historic figures fucked teenage girls

Attached: AB24CC6E-EB10-4102-8CFC-AC6D6CFEECB1.jpg (1170x1958, 908.65K)

>Gross
jew