Why are republicans such hypocrites?

Republicans:
>we must protect muhh heckin free speecherino!
Also republicans
>we have to ban books because words hurt my hecking feelingerinos! Reeee
Grow up, cowards

Attached: 30CA24EE-0C43-4AAF-9374-8EDBDB30F6D7.jpg (1170x1136, 496.82K)

Make your own state.

>Right-wingers: Concealed carry CANNOT be left up to the states!!!
>also right-wingers: Abortion can be left to the states it's fine.

Attached: 1654216690772.jpg (3053x3681, 694.58K)

> It’s the J-j-Jews!!!!
Holy SHIT, you guys are conspiracists. Take your meds. Now.

>Abortion - not a right guaranteed anywhere in the Constitution
>2nd Amendment - Is literally IN the original Constitution

Why are faggots such brain dead morons? Does cum make you stupid if you swallow it?

Can we pick a hole?
freedom or fascism. That's it. There will be no anarchy or communism.
We'll let the gay books in the bookstores when the government isnt picking winners to dominate retail markets. Otherwise, if the government is going to be in the business of picking winners then it ought to be picking them based on logic driven by good values.

What books and which libraries?

So true bestie, if it weren't for double standards the right wouldn't have any standards at all!

Zero books should be be banned, but if they have intellectual content it is far more severe and shows a rise to either fascism or communism. Are these erotic books about toddlers explicitly fucking each other, or a book with comprehensive data on a topic?

All library’s

Attached: 19895E94-D7AB-4E53-A508-371F3F49724F.jpg (1170x684, 341.87K)

>dismiss
So nothing has even happened yet except more democrat pearl clutching?

>"Gender Queer" became 2021's most challenged book because of its "LGBTQIA+ content, and because it was considered to have sexually explicit images

Uhhh...yeah...it's not really freedom of speech for me to take pictures of my cock and put it in a "children's book" because I'm a fucking creep.

>Baseless claims of obscenity should not be allowed to override our First Amendment rights
So if I called you a nigger...

this is gender queer
faggot teachers want you k-8 kids reading this in the classroom

Attached: 6.jpg (1170x924, 182.09K)

>this

It's amazing what little knowledge about the Constitution these people have

was california proven to be made of cake yet?

>gender queer
this is what faggots read at drag queen story hour

Attached: 3.jpg (1170x874, 192.21K)

Gee, Alf, TWO Ukrainian flags?

Why do democrats rape kids and day dream about bbc all the time?

what the fuck... how is it a baseless claim then?

Left wingers just swap the two positions and it makes just as much sense

>Anderson will now push for the court to restrict schools and even Barnes & Noble from distributing the books to minors without permission from a parent as the case works through the court.
And there is the half truth that started the pearl clutching. The push is against minors buying them without parental consent.

Just because I'm gay, doesn't mean I think showing children porn is a good idea. It's fucking creepy, man.

Freedom of speech isn't freedom from the consequences, groomer.

>your honor, it's clearly not obscenity, it's a book about two 14 year old boys sucking each other off

It kind of is.

NIGGER FAGGOTS

your freedom of speech does not include the right to show obscene images to children.

"One of them is transgendered. Equity and diversity is is important to a civil society, and our strength!"

Never ever take what they say as truth. There is always more to it.
As far as I know, this only affects the book being sold to kids without parental consent. Really makes you wonder why they don't want parents knowing what their children are reading

Gender Queer is blatantly pornographic. I have seen an excerpt from it and it is not appropriate for the target audience. Private stores should be able to sell it, but it should not be in school or public libraries where children would have access. I am not familiar with the other one

>banned book involves minors having sex, which is presented graphically
Since when is porn, especially that involving imaginary minors, "free speech"?

Cp isn't protected speech

You stupid monkey brained nigger. Right to killing babies is not mentioned anywhere in the constitution. Therefore that would be something that states should decide. You people are either evil as fuck are retarded as hell. I change my thoughts on that all the time.

Ooops! You missed first post, tranny! Better luck next time!

>liberals 2016
Anyone that objects to the results of the election are traitors
>liberals when Trump wins
BURN THIS COUNTRY TO THE GROUND #NOTMYPRESIDENT

Concealed carry permits are fine as long as we get nigger equality permits too.

you're the nigger from Tom Sawyer

Attached: 1594050686777.png (789x750, 18.1K)

Kek'd

>spend decades utilizing rules for radicals to achieve your political aims
>your political rivals catch on either by finding the material or just random chance over trying enough things over time
>"nooooo you can't do that, you have to be true to your principles so I can put you in the little box I painted for you"
eat a dick nigger

>reeeee you can't stop groomers from selling and stocking porn in libraries for kids

Attached: groomer.png (637x672, 263.75K)

ooh wow, so calling someone a faggot, tranny, nigger is grounds to have my life cancelled and not protected by 1A but not being able to sell your obscene book should have me up and arms to defend your shit plan to make money? NO THANKS!

The aclu is making the republicans seem more based than they actually are. This will only affect children buying the book without parental consent. If their parents are groomers, they can still get it and give it to their kids.

Hey faggot, where in the constitution does it say that women have a right to abort babies? Yeah didn't think so.

obscenity has never been protected under free speech. the supreme court has already upheld this. all pornography is obscenity and could technically all be banned if a state wanted to