I wonder if Cornyn/McConnell knew what the outcome of Bruen would be so they decided they could do their toothless gun deal to appease soccer moms with no downside.
I mean from a pure libertarian standpoint, if it’s two adults, and neither one was groomed, and no children result from it… but we all know it’s just so Jews can fuck little kids, so no.
Julian Howard
>Human error and design problems? Note that the Harrier and Osprey are both problematic, and both are VTOL: trying to be both a helicopter and an airplane at the same time is difficult. There were design compromises on the Osprey, like the rotors being shorter than optimal so that they could fold up and be easier to store. youtube.com/watch?v=57LfifvsTSg
Angel Russell
>only 28 pods left in my stash two more weeks, bro
It isn't my theory. I stole it from a lefty article I read a week or so ago that theorized it's a gambit knowing the onerous portions of whatever ends up becoming law would be voided and only the mental health funding and school security provisions would remain making it a win for the GOP.
It's a good theory for the turtle because otherwise it's just an unforced error.
Noah Miller
We all knew it was a matter of time for this, im just suprised they worked it in before they normalized pedophilia.
Elijah Foster
And if you argue saying this is pro-incest they will claim "Who said I'm in favor of it? I'm just against making it a crime", it's just Frankfurt School 101.
Luke Carter
what school you going to shoot up after the pods are all gone?
Why is banning vapes such an important thing for the government to do? Seems kinda weird when the general direction of western governments seems to be to legalize drugs rather than to make drugs illegal.
Joe was handing out crack pipes, for crying out loud.
it's enough to convince foreign money to adopt a new reserve currency, and it tempts adversarial countries to kick us while we're down. we're currently being invaded and destroyed from within.
Connor Reyes
100 percent true facts user. It’s a crime for a reason.
>bans a specific brand >other brands remain on market >WHY DID HE BAN ALL VAPES?! omega lul
Aaron Davis
Attention, this image is manipulated media. In order to combat online disinformation, I must ask that the poster delete the image and all other people in this thread refrain from reposting it. Thank you.
>Why is banning vapes such an important thing for the government to do? I think it has something to do with that time Joe said he was gonna cure cancer. That, and making arbitrary regulations banning shit that they have no business banning counts as a "win" to them. Also, nicotine makes you smarter and skinnier.
Governing for Impact (GFI) is a secretive left-of-center regulatory policy think tank created in 2019 to “prepare a new administration for transformative governance” by writing left-leaning regulatory recommendations for federal bureaucratic agencies. [1] GFI and its sister 501(c)(4) organization, the Governing for Impact Action Fund, were created as fiscally sponsored projects of the New Venture Fund and Sixteen Thirty Fund, respectively, the flagship nonprofits of the Arabella Advisors network.
Yes. The FDA b& Juuls, specifically. It's the most popular brand, but it's far from the only one.
Isaac King
Also, I would never, ever dress like such a faggot.
Anthony Sullivan
That's a lot of (you)s
Logan Long
So the Soros network is the source of all these crazy policy proposals. Not surprising at all.
Ian Watson
if only juul was made by pfizer it'd be okay
Parker Morgan
>The FDA b& Juuls, specifically That's fucked up. That's....like....unheard of, innit? Just >This brand >and only this brand >FUCK YOU! *BANNED!* Like normally they would claim that "such and such" chemical or "such and such" type of product would be banned, that just happened to be the product line of a brand which coincidentally banned a brand. But just to say "hey! FUCK YOU (insert brand name)" That's...really fucking weird and unheard of.
Ryder Peterson
They want to fuck kids.
Landon Powell
Website: governingforimpact.org Tax-Exempt Status: 501(c)(3) Executive Director: Rachael Klarman Created: 2019 Parent Organization: New Venture Fund Important Documents: Internal Budget Presentation Initial funding for GFI and the Governing for Impact Action Fund came from the philanthropic network of left-leaning billionaire George Soros. In 2019 and 2020, Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society and the Open Society Policy Center provided roughly $13 million in grants to the New Venture Fund and Sixteen Thirty Fund that were designated for GFI and the Governing for Impact Acton Fund.
GFI’s primary function is researching and writing on regulatory policy in order to draft policy memorandums for various departments in the executive branch. The GFI website, which, through June 2022, has remained hidden from conventional search engines and discoverable only by those who know the URL, shows 34 policy papers drafted by GFI covering the issue areas of education, environment, healthcare, housing, and labor. GFI’s internal budget presentations, however, state that the organization has drafted more than 60 policy papers which also include issue areas like nutrition and agriculture, policing, treasury, and voting. The policy papers for these latter categories could not be found among the 34 papers on the hidden GFI website. In a 2022 budget presentation GFI employees also boasted that the Biden Administration had taken action on more than 20 of GFI’s regulatory recommendations. [4]
Jackson Peterson
> >Governing for Impact (GFI) is a secretive left-of-center regulatory policy think tank created in 2019 to “prepare a new administration for transformative governance” by writing left-leaning regulatory recommendations for federal bureaucratic agencies. [1] GFI and its sister 501(c)(4) organization, the Governing for Impact Action Fund, were created as fiscally sponsored projects of the New Venture Fund and Sixteen Thirty Fund, respectively, the flagship nonprofits of the Arabella Advisors network. > >influencewatch.org/non-profit/governing-for-impact/
>That's...really fucking weird and unheard of. So is the FDA banning landlords from collecting rent, but hey, that's clownworld for ya. The rules are made up and the points don't matter.
>So is the FDA banning landlords from collecting rent, but hey, that's clownworld for ya. shit's fucked. And what about all those food processing plants that keep on catching fire? And all those train derailments? I was thinking that they were caused by glowies, but it almost seems like something that chinese operatives would do.
