Untitled

twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1540011419592163330?s=20

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-06-23 at 6.43.45 PM.png (1090x1188, 959.3K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/0CRWybgp7VA
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>ignoring a ruling from the judiciary branch
Didn't he just commit treason on live television?

>WE DON’T TAKE KINDLY TO YOU BLUE SHIRT-WEARIN FOLK ROUND HERE, PARTNER

Attached: 0DAA9BE4-0615-4139-881B-ED5146656958.jpg (728x883, 634.33K)

N

He's right. If the Supreme Court thinks it can impose inbred hillbilly values on NYC, the most sophisticated and cosmopolitan city in the world, they better think again. Let the Supreme Court enforce its ruling. I'll wait.

Nothing changes as in youll just proceed criminally then with youre criminal restriction of rights. Eyy yoo new yorkers yous guys were always retarded faggots fuggetaboutit

Can't they just issue a bench warrant for his arrest for sedition?

Attached: No obligation.jpg (1020x846, 189.46K)

>steal an election
>ignore the courts
What's next?

Nigger gets public streets shut down for him with armed security but thinks I don't have the right to bear arms

>become

Why would the DOJ do that when they agree with him?

You continue to not do shit.

bare*

Does your job not disgust you?

This guy is a tyrant and should be treated as such.

Please don't do insurrection stuff. We just are getting over the last one.

Civil war user was right, only red states will send in men to enforce the rights of blue states.

There are about a dozen other laws they probably have on the books that they will bend and twist to arrest anyone open carrying. Of course, those could all go to the supreme court too.

I

The Supreme court can issue a warrant, can't they?

For our Democracy silly.

I mean the constitution doesn't even mention a police force so it's technically true
There should be state laws in place that severely punish officers who choose not to act out of cowardice, but I fail to see what the constitution has to do with that process outside of granting that power to the states

>What's next?

The Butt Shank Revolution. Beware the Butt Shank.

Attached: butt shank.webm (352x240, 1.67M)

People actually said this guy was going to bring peace and unity to NYC. Haha. Everything got worse.

Cool sue them into oblivion.

lol, it's already the wild west. wild west africa.

Yes, excellent. Let’s set the precedent to ignore all courts. The end is neigh.

When you enact authoritarianism through DDOSing your judiciary with legislation.

Clearence throat rip's Adams.

But we are the insurrectionists lol

States ignore Federal laws all the fucking time. Just look at the whole concept of "Sanctuary cities"
It's screwed up but whatever nobody will ever do shit about it.

Sweetie. The supreme court can issue a summons or a contempt citation IMMEDIATELY and arrest that nigger putting him in chains like a run away slave in 1850. You really have no idea what power they have do you?

>retards actually think that a civil war is going to be sparked in defense of a bunch of new york faggot's gun rights

lmao

youtu.be/0CRWybgp7VA

Attached: TaylorPistol.gif (500x411, 1.3M)

Can someone explain what the court did to a literal retard?

Attached: 1454565424724.jpg (604x438, 16.87K)

>inbred hillbilly values

You literally have niggers walking around carrying everyday

>Let the Supreme Court enforce its ruling. I'll wait.
The Supreme Court enforces constitutional rights through the federal government. Of course, the federal government can always go rogue and refuse to enforce said rights, but that sets a precedence where the federal government could refuse to enforce countless other rights whenever a new administration takes over.

As far as legality goes, New York City opens itself up to civil litigation if it refuses to uphold the Supreme Court's ruling and instead violate constitutional rights. Are the resident's of New York City willing to let activists in their government bankrupt the city?

Instead of "bake the fucking cake", we have "conceal the fucking gun".

NYC was just rated one of the worlds most liveable cities

By federal government, I mean the executive branch.

New York requires a license to carry a pistol concealed on your person (legally, obviously criminals don't care).
If you are not super rich and famous, when you apply for said license, they will deny you because "defending yourself" isn't a good enough reason because your life is worthless in their minds.
This court ruling banned it, meaning that if you meet the requirements (IE: You're not a felon, and all that) then they SHALL (are obligated to) issue you the license to carry the guns you already passed a fucking background check and all sorts of shit to get in the first place.

Mutts doing anything to promote justice in Shitmuttistan
In the past couple of years:
>your elections were openly and brazenly stolen
>far-left activists took over part of one of your cities and caused $1 billion+ of property damage rioting throughout the country
The marxists in power are going to disarm you and then round up and eliminate Whites and conservatives. They won't listen to the rule of law.

Attached: 1625785030196.jpg (499x499, 77.88K)

for niggers?

Not sure what’s gayer, bunch of dudes with their pants down or the matching red shoes

>We cannot allow New York to become the wild west
Too bad, that's exactly what you're going to get. Leftists make it impossible to prosecute niggers and leftists for their crimes, now citizens will take justice into their own hands. That's the american way.

Attached: aeaf3eeb3d9ece2ee88b08d36e376ba8.png (843x1250, 971.94K)

So what, leftist rags and their shitty polling.

May issue permit to carry a gun states are BTFO. It must be shall issue or open carry or constitutional carry (both) in all states across the nation. They said historical understanding of the second amendment is the ONLY standard by which a gun law can be judged, not the state's interest, so while WHERE you can carry a gun can be restricted like in a court house OUTSIDE OF THE HOME THE RIGHT CARRYING A GUN IS AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT and that the gun must be at a minimum a handgun since that is the most common type of gun for self defense. That means handgun bans are impossible now and that carrying a gun for the purposes of self defense is an ABSOLUTE RIGHT for all law abiding citizens. It's a MASSIVE victory. By the legal standard they said MUST be applied in gun cases almost ALL gun laws will fall by the way side as they do not have a historical basis.

This is technically true as the decision has been reversed and remanded. The lower court has to go back and apply the supreme courts opinion to the case. Then they will likely strike down the law.

Ook ook ook

Like anybody left in NY state outside of the city is going to be ordered around by the witch and swagger man.

>Didn't he just commit treason on live television?
He'd have to have a republican arrest him and as we all know, conservatives are nothing but cucks.

LOL nice SCOTUS decision you have there. Go ahead and enforce it.

Attached: 1655933350024.jpg (1170x1077, 456.24K)

You are right ofc. Makes it all the more pathetic how drumph bent the knee to every court in the land who shut down every drump policy and plan.

>wild wild west
On account of NIGGERS?

you should have seen the part where they all start blowing each other.

Democrats actually would. Republicans wouldn't.

Although it's not like she can explain what an "unconstitutional gun law" really is.

Jews handing each other awards is their pilpul process in action

>posted before SCOTUS ruling
is she referring to another law or something in AZ?

>Although it's not like she can explain what an "unconstitutional gun law" really is.
ALL
OF
THEM

Attached: 1656017088397.png (338x438, 197.17K)

Absolutely based.

Arrest this nig

>ALL
>OF
>THEM
And then why do they allow unconstitutional gun laws like background checks?

the NFA and the GCA

You gun control nuts need to relax. No one is coming for your gun control. We just want some common sense gun control control.

Attached: 1513960653972s.jpg (250x226, 6.45K)

>wicki-wild wild
>wicki-wicki-wild
>wicki-wild
>wicki-wicki

No that would be #45 last January.

>is she referring to another law
Look at the date of the tweet and tell me what you think.

I was beaten by a fucking leaf...

Attached: Tomoko despondent in bed.jpg (460x460, 35.13K)

The opinion claims to be based.

Unironically, Every one of these guys is more fit and gets more pussy than any incel here lol

This groid is gonna be in trouble !!

the supreme no longer has any legitimacy after the coup president installed his crooks on it. sorry

>the NFA and the GCA
So why do Republicans go along with those laws?

G

Reminder this is the same nigger who bawled like a bitch and basically begged the feds to not take away control of Rikers from him because it’s “his people” in there. This nigger has no intention of getting control of the city and is pissed that it’s now in the hands of vigilantes basically and for good reason.

Oh, they have historical bases, but the mental gymnastics needed to say Jim Crow laws are legally sound is going to be fun to hear. Maybe we can get them to say the trail of tears and massacres of recently disarmed natives were legally sound too.

lmao seething fucking criminals

they are so disappointed that their citizenry will be able to arm themselves and not be victimized by their criminal pets

Delightful.

Attached: hqdefault2.jpg (1200x800, 110.34K)

>what an "unconstitutional gun law" really is
Literally all of them lmao
Although I will cede that we shouldn't have a right to nuclear/biological/chemical weapons. That's it though, we should have access to all the arms/armor available.

why is this allowed? same shit happened with covid. they made a bunch of illegal laws that they knew were going to get struck down in the courts yet their heads are still attached.

This is true. No one - and I mean NO ONE - considers Jackson a legitimate justice

is "inbred hillbilly values" a legal clause? Also- doesn't NYC stink like sour milk and rat shit? haven't most businesses abandoned that shithole except for the very small wealthy zones? Can't the rural peasants simply block your highways with their trucks and starve you all to death?

Good. Make the cuckservatives respond in kind or just destroy the Constitutional Republic alright. I'm tired of waiting.

Attached: accelerate.gif (498x498, 1.33M)

>Literally all of them lmao
Again though, why do Republicans go along with them then?

>Although I will cede that we shouldn't have a right to nuclear/biological/chemical weapons.
But government should? hmm...

What do yall actually think this will lead too? I think nothing will happen.

Actually, the federal government can't really do much of anything if a State's government does not work with it. The federal government simply does not have the manpower and is completely reliant on delegating enforcement of gun laws to the States. While the federal government could send in the ATF to arrest a State's residents that violate federal gun laws, the State government or even the sheriff could in return arrest the ATF agents for violating the constitutional rights of its residents.

That's always been the case, state police and governance aren't supposed to be under the direct control of the federal government. Local state laws are enforced by their state governance and organizations and vice versa with federal laws and their enforcement by federal organizations.

They don't have power. If the Supreme Court has neither the will or means to inflict lethal violence on its enemy by its own will, then it is by definition powerless.

Whites aren’t the majority except in small villages in the UK. Clean your own house before you start throwing shit