It really do be like that tho.
How hard can it be, surely if/pol/ was right then it would be able to refute this easily
Alexander Barnes
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.4plebs.org
twitter.com
Carson Wood
>1st amendment only applies to manual printing press
Leo Nguyen
It's refuted easily every time you post this here.
Herbs.
Mason Richardson
As third world serf you won't understand this, but if the government has x, then people by right can also have x, because the second amendment is there, ultimately, for us to kill the government.
Dylan Long
George Washington would think a SAW is amazing and you can go fuck yourself if you think otherwise.
Landon Ramirez
it's false, i refute it thusly
Robert Fisher
A 20 something year old man in good shape could go to an elementary school and kill everyone there with a sharp rock.
Andrew Reyes
seethe glownigger
Hudson Lee
>How hard can it be, surely if/pol/ was right then it would be able to refute this easily
The second amendment is about why firearms are legal, not about what firearms are legal.
That's why they didn't mention muskets in the second amendment.
inb4 you remain a 1pbtID shill.
Luis Williams
You mean easily refute that, again? How new are you?
Luke Long
>a bunch of soldiers never expected guns to advance just as every other bit of technology does
Zachary Walker
don't be retarded on purpose. firstly, when the second amendment was signed there were firearms capable of a technical rate of fire of 600+rpm/operational rate of fire 60rpm
Joseph Smith
It is about relativity idiot.
William Baker
Both military and civilians had the same guns. That's all I want.
Dominic Collins
>the founding fathers wouldn't have loved modern technology
You are a drooling retard.
Alexander Stewart
>1654832888918.jpg
How many times are you going to post this same, exact thread, shill?
Chase Gonzalez
The founders made it perfectly clear what their intent was with the 2nd and yes a semi and even fully automatic rifle would be included.
Do some fucking reading from the founders you lazy ass piece of shit.
Charles Bell
You're right user. The founders couldn't have imagined an AR-15.
That said, if you gave Madison or Hamilton an AR-15 they would most certainly recognize it as a gun. Now if you showed them social media or the radio, they wouldn't have the faintest idea what it is. The internet is far from what they could have imagined - no one could have conceived of instant communication around the world.
So then, following your atandard, the government has the right to limit free speech on the internet, because the founders couldn't have conceived of it - much more so than an AR-15 anyway.
Zachary Brown
What's the rate of fire, max capacity, and reload speeds on those? I'm happy to restrict things to that level.
Lucas Wright
How about level things up, the entire world of military and police forces go back to flintlocks you daft gun banning cunts.
Ian Carter
>How hard can it be, surely if/pol/ was right then it would be able to refute this easily
As soon as gov't officials forbid their own security forces to use any kind of guns or protection gear, then I'll reconsider the 2nd Amendment.
Lucas Cruz
>1pbtid
bot thread, report and move on
Ayden Wilson
Based bong
Carson Roberts
>expecting government to obey the rules
Luis Parker
Until regards stop responding.
Hudson Hernandez
2A was written to protect the people from tyrannic governments. modern government doesn't use muskets, so the people need similar firepower to the gov.
Jace Richardson
the founding fathers would give SAWs to every incel.
Adrian Hall
Retarded take. No government writes a stipulation to kill itself.
Camden Harris
Exactly, which is why I want to buy my own MQ-1 Predator Drone with two AGM-114 missiles, only used for hunting purposes.
Angel Taylor
Daniel Rivera
Civilians had weapons on par with or even better than those issued to the soldiers of the world's most powerful military at the time.