How come no one was able to debunk him? Is he final boss of economics?
How come no one was able to debunk him? Is he final boss of economics?
He debunked himself by mooching off others and abandoning his own family.
Reread the entire 1900's user
he is so easy to debunk its not even enticing
>dictatorship of proletariat
but submit to the party
>dispose of means of production
but the party decides what will be produced and when
>remove capitalism
but keep it in inter-state relations
gommunizm is like teletubbies
when youre a toddler its fascinating, but once you grow up its extremely annoying
I debunked him last thread: bourgeoise and proletariat must be in symbiose, not in fighting. They both can exploit each other, but a balance must be found
Labor as value is a good idea. But I wouldn't consider him an economist. More propagandist.
fpbp
it's not a good idea because it makes no sense whatsoever. not all labor is equally valuable or even a good indicator of a product's value. this is obvious to a child and is more of a mystical statement than the scientific realism they pretend to care about
and then reread the 1800's
>How come no one was able to debunk him?
Just did
>Is he final boss of economics?
Good game
It’s more valid than having fiat currency controlled by foreigners, that’s a fact. It’s not *the only* way to measure value but you’re literally paid for your labor. Marx is still a degenerate
Try reading (or listen on audiobook whatevs) picrel so you won't sound so retarded next time brainlet.
this you too?
at least fiat currency for all its evils isn't imaginary pixie dust. there is no cohesive labor theory of value let alone a way for any totalitarian party to implement it
pretty neat that business does well when you have a bunch of slave labor camps, why didn't anyone else think of that?
>final boss
that would be feder. all of his works and notes are hard to found.
You took anything what Marx says seriously?
Do you understand that he has live the end of his life combating his own "ideology", right? After noticing how evil and out of mind it was.
Serious, that famous picture of him with his white hair he was actually trying to fight the spread of his idiotology.
For many reasons you shouldn't take him seriously.
He never has any data or logic to his writings. Only a roller-coaster of "feels".
Is a wrong interpretation of society, and not even in general but from a particular point of view (his) about the beginning on the Industrial Age. That's obvious wrong.
Nothing that he preach is corroborate by reality or science for that matter.
There's no actually equality in existence. Is not a principle.
Treat others like you like to be treated is a concept that came from religions like Christianity and Bhudism.
He preaching what he preach just proves that he's just a little man, angry with God, you can even confirmed that by reading his poems.
Karl Marx Poem.
>With Satan I have struck my deal,
>He chalks the signs, beats time for me
>I play the death march fast and free.
>I shall howl gigantic curses on mankind:
>Ha! Eternity! She is an eternal grief
>Ourselves being clockwork, blindly mechanical,
>Made to be the foul-calendars of Time and Space,
>Having no purpose save to happen, to be ruined,
>So that there shall be something to ruin
>If there is a something which devours,
>I'll leap within it, though I bring the world to ruins-
>The world which bulks between me and the Abyss
>I will smash to pieces with my enduring curses.
>I'll throw my arms around its harsh reality:
>Embracing me, the world will dumbly pass away,
>And then sink down to utter nothingness,
>Perished, with no existence that would be really living!
Don't forget that he live in the Ivory Tower most of his life. He marry in to the English nobility.
You're mentally challenge.
I think the last 100 years debunked him pretty hard. Should probably sign off though bud, 4th period is starting soon and your algebra teacher will be pissed if your late zoomer.
Fiat currency literally is the imaginary pixie dust of currency… labor is something you can get value out of. Like a house built, or a oil produced. I don’t care about all the convoluted stuff about economic theories. Labor is literally inherently valuable. I don’t know how someone could even possibly deny that. It’s not a “currency” but without it no good or service exists. When you trade those things for fiat currency you’re turning it into debt. Just because Marx is a degenerate Jew that doesn’t mean reality changes.
fiat currency is based on contracts and enforcement, very real things, but not material things like gold or a house. labor is real but labor THEORY OF VALUE is not real, it's not something that exists or is even coherent as a theory
Because nobody who debates Marx seriously ever actually read what the manifesto says. It is not a order to make a utopia, it is a document that outlines all the evils and flaws of the capitalistic system, which it does fairly well