How come the Book of Enoch is not part of the biblical cannon used by jews?
It's the story of how god punished the angels who went down to earth and mated with the women and made giants. It also gives an explanation why the Genesis flood(6000 years ago) was morally correct.
Book of Enoch
Bump
Because Enoch wrote that Noah was white because his mom fucked an angel (ayylmao). Pic very related.
> CHAPTER CVI
> 1. And after some days my son Methuselah took a wife for his son Lamech, and she became pregnant by him and bore a son. 2. And his body was white as snow and red as the blooming of a rose, and the hair of his head †and his long locks were white as wool, and his eyes beautiful†. And when he opened his eyes, he lighted up the whole house like the sun, and the whole house was very bright. 3. And thereupon he arose in the hands of the midwife, opened his mouth, and †conversed with† the Lord of righteousness. 4. And his father Lamech was afraid of him and fled, and came to his father Methuselah. 5. And he said unto him: 'I have begotten a strange son, diverse from and unlike man, and resembling the sons of the God of heaven; and his nature is different and he is not like us, and his eyes are as the rays of the sun, and his countenance is glorious. 6. And it seems to me that he is not sprung from me but from the angels, and I fear that in his days a wonder may be wrought on the earth. 7. And now, my father, I am here to petition thee and implore thee that thou mayest go to Enoch, our father, and learn from him the truth, for his dwelling-place is amongst the angels.'
too easy to reduce to principles which allows extraction of knowledge.
Not inspired text from God; not scripture.
Aliens are fake and gay.
>Aliens are fake and gay.
>but magical, immortal, flying rabbis are totally real! Crust is kang!
Protestant moment.
The earliest people to look at the Book of Enoch determined that it was LARPing fanfiction.
Yeah, it is really cool stuff, but it is still a fanfic. Giants are real.
The flood was real.
Humanity is reset over and over again.
That's very close to truth
It is not considered a part of the bible because it does not give the 'glory' to God. Pointing to angels and things of that nature.
That said, failing to be included does not mean it is false overall. Though some have suggested later embellishment to facts through subsesquent rewrites.
Personally I find it fascinating, the early hebrews (not jews) placed faith in it. But I do not hold it equal to any of the the books of the bible. If something in it seems to contradict the Bible, then I take the approach that the Bible is correct not the Book of Enoch.
The book of Enoch is like these foot notes or a personal diarey recounting the event that happened instead of the consensuated by the redeactes; approved by the state final story.
The Old Testamnt has been redacted and adjusted to the ruler will just as much as new testament was.
The book of Enoch seems to be free to that ddidle doing and to some extempt registers something wich discussion was banned.
>biblical cannon
who do you think sat down and decided what got into the bible and what did not? Gatekeepers have been at it for a very long time. Rats in the corn, user.
You have to understand that the Bible is very edited collection of scriptures. All its close two milleniums this has been the case. First the Romans edited it for their purposes and we got the proto universalism by cathoclisism. After that the jews took over and edited it to push their great lies.
Let go of the ”inspirated by God” narrative and look into the apocryphic texts. If they were good for Jesus, then who are you to say anything about their validity.
Book of Enoch tells very clearly about the origins of the evil corrupted forces now having more power than ever. Of course satan/satans do not want that information to be available.
it's canon in the ethopian bible.
But the church that diddles kids and disregards anything that doesn't validate them said it's a no no
You ever wonder what those words mean? What metric is used to make such a distinction? Who has the strength to write that which the Lord does not want written?
>jews
i like how christcucks sidestep the fact that the only reason the catholics took enoch out of the bible is that the jews did it too. guess it hurts to admit that youre just fanboys of the kikes at the end of the day huh?
Intense. The paternal line is broken at Jacob, Esav the Redhead would be the inheritor in that case. (((They))) have been kvetching ever since.
The whole Ethiopian church thing is curious though. From what I can tell they are the result of migratory jews after the fall of akkad. Either way:
>abyssinian
Sounds like something I don't want to be associated with.
>How come the Book of Enoch is not part of the biblical cannon used by jews?
It describes Jesus in great detail before he even came. So Jews can't have it in their canon. It describes the world is unequivocally flat and fixed so "Christian" institutions can't have that either.
I’m aging going to Jewish books for answers to life’s tough questions. Fool
The Book is a hoax.. just another fake relic courtesy from the Occult during the guilded age..
It's folly to believe anything derived from ancient times is true.. (translations),(fossil record) and (carbon dating) are fake it till you make it schemes.
the only thing true about the book is the firmament, and that the Earth isnt a fucking ball.. but many worlds faceted together like a fine work of jewels... the honeycomb earth theory will soon prevail!
And the shills are here.
You know you ugly evil jews, you are like a shit stain in this world? Soon to be erased for good and no one lamenting for you. Happy days coming. At least you burn fast, not like your father.
tldr of pic rel...
science is just recycled Rosicrucian thought and principles...
"the end justifies the means"
>biblical cannon used by jews
Because it's 100% prophetic as to Jesus. I believe it's the first appearance of the title Son of Man which the Lord used repeatedly to describe himself.