LMAO Google and the dictionary redefined "Bourgeois" to mean the middle class, not the upper class

LMAO Google and the dictionary redefined "Bourgeois" to mean the middle class, not the upper class.

So they've already redefined communism and socialism to make them sound like "you will own nothing" or "the goberment owns everything" (both of which are abjectly false) and now they've changed the definition of bourgeois so that all of the Marxist rhetoric against them makes it sound like it's directed against the middle class, rather than the upper class

Good god.

Do you see how your entire life is defined by capitalist, rightwing propaganda? All of it. Everything. Your entire world is defined by rightwing propaganda. Everything you believe about communism, the left, the USSR, China, Cuba, North Korea, any of it

Anyway, IRL communism simply is a movement aimed at advancing the interests of the working class and poor over the interests of the rich. It has nothing to do with "you will own nothing" or whatever. That's capitalism.
Capitalism = property is owned by the wealthy only
Communism = everyone owns their own property. Ideally 100% home ownership rate

Anything you hear differently is just capitalist propaganda

Attached: google changed bourgeois definition.png (899x674, 82.6K)

These are the tricks they use. Unfortunately, I know most of you are not smart enough to see through them.

Racism, bigotry, "culture war", and form of identity politics, those are also their tricks. They get you to vote for identity politics rather than class politics. That's another one of their main tricks.

Any Forums falls for that one every time. Like religiously

Oh you thought you were on the right side of history? Well looks like we changed some definitions around, tough luck sweetie :)

You openly support the rightwing ministry of truth rewriting the facts, huh?

>You openly support the rightwing ministry of truth rewriting the facts, huh?
Google is literally peak the rightwing capitalist ministry of truth

That’s a huge wall of text that I didn’t read, however Bourgeois always meant middle-class. The ‘elite’ or ‘1%’ or whatever you are railing about were called ‘Aristocrats’. Please educate yourself on how French parliament functioned at the time and WHY the Jacobin incited the revolution. I hate kikes and commies as much as you do, but you are just wrong on this one.

t. Frenchman

they didnt change anything my guy, the middle rose up to destroy the ruling class, only to become the ruling class themselves... If you read any history book you would know that.

LMAO no. But of course you on this site will willfully jump on board with the new, rightwing corporate sponsored version of history

>rightwing ministry of truth
commies are the dumbest fucking people on the planet

Case in point - I know Acadian families with the surname ‘Bourgeois’ and they can trace their lineage right back to a shoemaker who emigrated here. They were literally the definition of middle class. My direct ancestors were a band of 7 brothers that were all convicted of felonies.

Dude you don’t understand the French language, that’s fine, but you don’t get to parade your ignorance in front of the entire world without having other more intelligent anons call you out on your lies. Again, you are terribly uninformed about the French Revolution and why these terms mean what they do. Inform yourself, buddy, because it’s really embarrassing to see you continue to talk about things you are completely clueless about

Bourgeois means the upper class, not the middle class, LMFAO. That's never going to change no matter how much you people try to twist it or get on board with your new corporate sponsored dictionary definitions.

Same with socialism and communism not meaning "goberment owns everything" and in fact meaning the polar opposite. They mean everyone gets to own their own property

>big tech and literary institutions are the right-wing ministry of truth
Kek

Upper middle class, sure not aristoctats that where part of thr nobility, but even robespierre would be considered as bourgeois

LMFAO the sad part is now that you have google on your side rewriting history and dictionary definitions in your favor you'll prob be able to con people into believing you and your retarded shit

Absolutely they are. The left doesn't believe in private industry, the right does. Which side do you think they support at the end of the day?

Yeah ok I tried you are just another lost American cuckold with the IQ of a nigger and the attention span of a squirrel. Go suck off your kike overlords, I’m done with you

Bourgeois = upper class, not the middle class

So you're here to just tell other people they are 'wrong' and provide annecdotal opinions to why definitons are being changed?

How about you make a fucking point instead of being this much of a faggot. The bourgeoisie is also related to the term Burgher.
We're talking about middle class merchants and craftworkers who were known as burghers: those who sold products such as a baker or who provided a service like those of a blacksmith.

dont be naive you fucking shill people have the same resources to research as you.

>Do you see how your entire life is defined by capitalist, rightwing propaganda? All of it. Everything. Your entire world is defined by rightwing propaganda. Everything you believe about communism, the left, the USSR, China, Cuba, North Korea, any of it
Or maybe the people in charge subscribe to the same marxist faggotry as your dumb ass but they view the white middle class as the problem, you fucking faggot.

No, I won't become a communist. Now fuck off and die, you 18 year old tranny dipshit.

Why are you quoting yourself you retarded faggots..

We're not talking about the fucking etymology of the word, we're talking about what it means and it means the upper class, not the middle class.

Bourgeois = upper class, not middle class. No matter how many mental gymnastics you do and no matter how much you stand up to willingly advance the lies of your rightwing capitalist monolith Google, which should not even exist but does only due to your corrupt capitalist property law

How is google right wing though? It's a leftist move as they hate the middle class the most and want everyone to be poor or a rich Jew. Now they can direct the hate of the retarded leftists tools against the middle class and protect their ultra rich backers.

You think that people in charge of Google subscribe to......marxism. A set of ideas that does not recognize the sovereignty of private industry. OK cool story chief

Holy fuck imagine unironically believing the democrats are le based socialists. Just fuck off, retard.

I am from Russia. Socialist communists are just roleplaying. Also i would order to publicly decapitate every one of you.

Being bourgeois is not about wealth, it's a mindset and a series of attitudes oriented towards comfort, security and materialism.

I cannot believe there are people on Any Forums right now defending that lifestyle. Clinging to your little materialistic advantages is the reason of the white genocide. All the "oh those white trash shouldn't have children if they don't have a 5 bedroom house and a high credit score" is litterally being an accessory to (((them))).

>Bourgeois always meant middle-class. The ‘elite’ or ‘1%’ or whatever you are railing about were called ‘Aristocrats’
Aristocrats don’t exist anymore, the middle class from back then became the upper class of today retard.

Dumb question user, he is just a retarded faggots.

For the sake of argument - the French parliament was divided in three groups, and each of these groups had equal amount of votes, but unequal number of representatives. The ‘lower class’ had almost a hundred, the ‘middle class’ had a few dozen, and the ‘upper class’ had 5. The ‘middle class’ represented the bourgeoisie who lived in the citie, and they banded with the 5 (who represented the aristocracy) to shit all over the commoners, even though the commoners had 3 times more ‘votes’ in parliament. Again I’m not taking the time to give all of you a history lesson, learn it yourselves. The only reason I even replied to you is because you name-dropped Maximilian. Tell me with a straight face that Jean-Paul Marat was ‘upper middle class’

Any corporation is rightwing. The left doesn't believe in private industry. Only the right does.
There's no private industry in socialism or communism. That's only possible with capitalism

On the left we don't believe in "bourgeois property" AKA rich people's giant private empires like google.

Then the capitalist propagtanda twists that to say "communism means you will own nothing!" when in reality we believe every human being should own their own home, own property, and own a share of the company they work for. We just don't want the bourgeois (which means the upper class) owning everything

>LMAO Google and the dictionary redefined "Bourgeois" to mean the middle class, not the upper class.
They aren't wrong. Marxists want to weaponize poor fucks to kill the middle class so that they can become upper class themselves. Marxism is the definition of divide and conquer.