Quantitative Easing is a Good Thing

The surest sign that someone is educated on politics via memes and internet culture is that they think "Quantitative Easing" is a derogatory term.

Attached: QE.png (1500x1000, 440.97K)

QE always has a backlash and we got it now in form of inflation. When the money printer goes brrrrrr brrrrr then the inflation will hike up with delay. Manh such cases!

Yes, but that's better than what would happen if we didn't do it.

eeeee how? because if you tell me that my basket going up is better than it going down or staying put im going to be sure that you are retarded

Banks and currency are cringe civilization spooks, fuck off urbanite, go worship the golden calf somewhere else

Attached: Banks go boom.png (545x782, 417.12K)

Devaluing the purchasing power through inflations reduces the value of savings.
Savings is the 1st and foremost method to ensure upward mobility.

Upward mobility cannot be obtained if any savings is negated by inflation.

Neck yourself shit wit

>Buys bonds and equities
Yeah with debt. That means the Fed has no money and owes $30 trillion. The Fed is the definition of debt slavery.

Attached: Money Printer Go Brrrrrr.gif (640x360, 2.22M)

QE is fancy term for money printing, it goes from the spigot to the richest in society, namely banks, private equity, corporations, etc, robbing the people's purchasing power and labor with inflation.

You want to see what it looks like when you're basket goes down?

Look up the "great depression"

>Devaluing the purchasing power through inflations reduces the value of savings.

Good, anyone who saves their wealth in cash deserves to lose it. Only the dumbest fuckers alive do that.

It can create the money, the FED doesn't need to worry about debt because it can issue money into existence.

>it goes from the spigot to the richest in society, namely banks, private equity, corporations, etc, robbing the people's purchasing power and labor with inflation.

After the government spent that money to the poorest people.

The government sells bonds to the private sector, the government takes that money and helps the poor, and then the FED buys up the security... the money was still spent first and foremost on the poor.

qe wouldnt be needed if the fed was ended

>After the government spent that money to the poorest people.
kek

Most of the U.S budget goes to social security, medicaid, and medicare. The second biggest expense is military, the largest expenditure when looking at military budget is wages to employees.

So how would we expand the money supply when needed?

How do you burgers keep your slave works from India in the line? I mean desi niggers will revolt someday once they figure our the whole thing is a ponzy scheme.

>After the government spent that money to the poorest people.
imagine believing this

Attached: g4q23t345652gsg4562547u3u4h5g33.gif (607x609, 753.51K)

Yeah.... I guess believing official documentation on the U.S budget is unreasonble.

>It can create the money, the FED doesn't need to worry about debt because it can issue money into existence.

It can't create shit. Quanititative easing is a way to stealth tax the populous so you can fliter their labour of value through the economy. It's the classic robbing Peter to pay Paul. If 'creating' money out of thin air was so reliable then central banks wouldn't be storing precious metals like gold in their safes.

Attached: Gold Reserves.jpg (1200x2297, 2.26M)

Nigger intellect right there.

Yeah... it's a tax on all existing money, that's the point. Sometimes you need to devalue currency.

White trash intellect from a country i thought was more progressive.

Some kind of loan backed by a margin of collateral.

That's M1 money, and can only be created if m0 money already exists as its base.

>Yeah... it's a tax on all existing money, that's the point. Sometimes you need to devalue currency.

Yeah, to get the serfs to be productive for the state. Again, it's debt slavery, $30 trillion to be precise when it comes to Murica.

Why does collateral have to be money?

Well lets say there's no money at all.... there won't be anyway to create money because fractional reserve banking requires a deposit first... it's just the deposit doesn't disapear when the loan is made so now the money supply has doubled.

Because it's a ponzi scheme where (((they))) control the money, and thus reap profits at every step.

>serfs

Yeah.... having to pay a small portion of your wealth in exchange for having every need met for you by the government, who protects you, feeds you, gives you freedom, gives you cheap food, etc.... that's slavery.

If being a slavery means living like a king only 150 years ago, I'll take it.

cause jews say so

SBlack slaves in America had unironically more freedom and higher quality of life then most working people today. Go suck on your masters tiny mutilated penis like the good faggot you are.