When is Any Forums actually going to refute this legit argument?

It really do be like that tho.

Attached: 1654832888918.jpg (474x474, 36.5K)

i need my rifle to protect me from the g-

Attached: a10.jpg (480x360, 16.15K)

Because fuck weapons regulations altogether. I should be able to own recreational nuclear weapons, and whatever latest weapons technologies have been invented.
Why should the government have a monopoly on violence?

Right after the first gun was built they started building a better one. I find it hard to believe that a bunch of guys that just fought a war had no idea guns would continue to advance.

You don't attack the plane, you attack the ground crew. And if you mortar the runway, the planes can't take off.

Attached: listen you fantastically retarded motherfucker.png (872x886, 219.82K)

>gets drone striked before reaching the said airfield.

firing rate over 60 meaningless

You WILL NOT do anything. You don't have military training. You dont have training on how to use a mortar. Go back to /k/.

this isn't even true, they had those crank full auto mgs back in the 18th century so the basis of the argument here is on a flawed premise assuming the founding fathers couldn't have predicted what guns would look like in our times but this isn't the case as they had weapons in that era with similar fire rates, so get fucked they definitely realized as time went on the gun tech would improve and during the drafting of the second amendment debated this very issue no doubt.

We should grow some plants here... I'm partial to SAGE...

Attached: Girandoni.jpg (426x392, 53.66K)

OP BTFO

Attached: 1655120312893.jpg (762x759, 470.64K)

Why can't 18 year old kids own a nuclear arsenal? Ar-15s are outdated and ineffective against the government

false equivalence go fuck yourself.

Modern warfare is not fought with primitive guns, it's actually fought with nukes and tactical airsrikes.
Arm every American child with drones leaded with nukes and then pretended that you need to keep up with the advancement of weaponry.

Airstrikes*

i know you're trolling but i really hate how disingenuous these arguments against the 2nd amendment are, in fact its one thing that really irritates me, firstly guns gave women for the first time in history the reasonable ability to defend themselves against men yet are the biggest adversaries to concealed carries, an armed populace is the most safe when you go to a grocery store and everyone including your 90yr old granny is packing heat. the problem is not enough people own guns and can defend themselves with them.

The Lorenzoni Repeating Flintlock

Designed in 1688, and fired multiple shots.

Shut the fuck up

I don;t care about the 2nd Amendment of the founding faggot disney characters and their lawyer-speak constitution, I'll have a gun if I want, legal or not. Laws are for people who need them

Attached: 1653437329405.png (480x480, 451.83K)

That didn't stop goatfuckers or indeed the IRA from messing about with RPGs.

Maybe it's time you put these nuts in your mouth, bitch.

Attached: memes in 1991.png (465x483, 344.66K)

The simple fact that 99% of the shills on the subject have to be sourced from foreign countries should tell you everything you need to know on the subject.

A woman should rely on her husband for protection, not on herself, another reason why your constitution is cancerous abomination. It's what spawned feminism and many other morally rotten movements.

The gun on the bottom is:
A. Not a rifle
B. Not legal for Americans to own without a special permit (NFA and FOPA)
C. It should be legal to own