I unironically support the mega block because it means you can house a large amount of people nearby a city and since it would be located in the city without car parking spaces. People who work there would be renting theses flats as the majority of cities around the world have """"""Legacy""""" infrastructure which is just another way to say trams, roads, and rail.
Which means you can basically ensure those people who are living in theses blocks would be working in the city or limited to the surrounding infrastructure.
Further more if your worry about it's design you build it in a neo classical style with very few elements that are hard to clean or otherwise maintain allowing you to build an inside that is on pair with 40s and 50s buildings.
An I talian vertical cemetery Probably designed by a communist jew pretending to be Italian
Asher Wood
Torre Velasca, the ugliest fucking building in Milan. Built by kike or kike-affiliated architects (BBPR group, they also built many holocaust memorials)
Easton Gomez
>Mega blocks have some advantages No. They don't. They are commie's wet dreams. They want to concentrate people in large cities so they are easier to control and to drive up the prices for real estate and rent. Kys faggot.
That is Torre Velasca in the center of Milan, not really a megablock considering it’s 100% luxury apts
Parker Morgan
>Mega blocks have some advanages Advantages for who?
Owen Phillips
>No. They don't. They are commie's wet dreams. They want to concentrate people in large cities so they are easier to control and to drive up the prices for real estate and rent. >Kys faggot. Let me ask you a question, During the golden age of the 1950s why were there so many houses being built? why did the price skyrocket when that begun to slow down and... stop.
If your artificially increase demand by not building housing then the price goes up. If you build a large amount of nearby a place that people who instead of them traveling 2 - 3 hours into work every day you take the demand off outer area's that otherwise wouldn't like the country off.
>golden age of the 50’s Britain was still on ration cards you dunce
Blake Anderson
>Advantages for who? Me, I work in the city where there is a high demand for cheap housing.
How do you solve the high demand..
You build more. Well, Unless they build more like 4 hours outside of the city where the land is cheap thus forcing everyone to drive long amounts in the city because nobody has built rail in 100 years.
basically anyone who has dreams about how all of society ought to be organized should be put to death for the benefit of said society
Benjamin Howard
>Britain was still on ration cards you dunce Why was UK on the ration card, answer that question before making that statement. Massive debt from effectively fighting two death wars that killed their empire.
Could've redevoloped the entirety of london and all the other cities that were flatten by the German air raids. Rubble was still in place in some area's till the 1980s.
Ryan Edwards
>I work in the city No one made you do such a stupid thing Why don’t you live in a suburb and use public transport or a bike? Or are they only for the “other” people?
Luis Foster
So it was a “golden age” (your words) of massive debt? I think you’ve forgotten what point you were making
Caleb Perry
>Rubble was still in place in some area's till the 1980s. Can confirm. t. family from Hull which became a post-apocalyptic wasteland
Luke Rodriguez
>So it was a “golden age” (your words) of massive debt? >I think you’ve forgotten what point you were making When you think of the golden age of capitalism you think of the USA who experience a boom as a massive industrial base was built to support full scale war which was now being repurposed.
When you nit pick you pick a retarded example like India in famine unable to feed itself.
Xavier Nguyen
In the 1950s we were still a closed socialist state and people worked where they were born. The state supported this. After the fall of gay soviet union, capitalism and privatization of state companies began. People were laid off and state companies have been sold or shut down. Most foreign companies started opening their offices in big cities. This forced people living in bumfuck parts of this country to move closer to big cities. And this drove the prices of mortgages and rent to new highs. The same banks that own the foreign companies operating in this country also provide mortgages to people.
Gabriel Powell
How about no cities at all and you die
Owen Gray
Fuck man that strawman you made got demolished Good job
Jaxson Rodriguez
>Well, Unless they build more like 4 hours outside of the city where the land is cheap thus forcing everyone to drive That's where you're wrong kiddo Remote work Telecommute Knowledge economy
I support them too, in fact I also think cage homes were optimal but I'd never fucking live in either, so just as long it's poor wagies suffering then that's all well and good
Let's talk about infrastructure 101. The contruction of phone infrastructure has stalled leaving many country towns using systems design and developed in the 1960s or using switchboxes who were only built for a small town
When you throw in more people theses boxes fill up, meaning you can no longer have everyone in the town able to connect to a phone or internet because the infrastructure isn't there.
It's a good suggestion just you coming from this as if people have built the things that just simply aren't there.
Asher Gonzalez
You're arguing that it's cheaper to build and maintain roads than wireless towers
