Why is it so hard for Any Forums to admit that the strongest army in history for their period was not white?
Why is it so hard for Any Forums to admit that the strongest army in history for their period was not white?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Mongol jewshit is pure fiction, you dimwit
S
Fakeass Khan.
I wonder what mongolians think about their empire today, I hope they are not apologetic
>encounter european forts
>suddenly and randomly cant go further
huh wow
Where are the Mongols now, rabbi? Oh, I know. Back to their desert shithole after getting buck broken by the Slavs.
Mongols did fine in open fields and against fortifications out in the open but stopped dead in Europe. They weren't going to do shit in Europe even if their were hordes of them.
Science says genghis khan was white man
I know the ol, our Kahn died so we all need to go home excuse. The truth is the little gain they got in Europe was incomplete and costly. They had no choice but to turn around.
They became Bulgarians user.
Some historical account I perused describe him with red hair and green eyes, which threw me a loop, frankly.
Though such people existed in Tocharia and the Tarim Basin once, which isn't far from that region.
I like their horsies
>>The strongest army at a given point of time was not white.
You know, I don't find that too hard to digest. Wtf OP.
true, it was Italian
>attack the weakest part of Europe during its weakest period
>encounter only token resistance from surprised farmers and undermanned garrisons
>run into actual military defenses
>UUUHHH.... WE MUST LEAVE
Yeah, the europeans also switched to light cavalry. To chase them down with their old Cantabrian circle trick.
China had a lot of very heavily fortified cities and they still got benis'd. What's the difference?
>attack the weakest part of Europe during its weakest period
R*mans?
Rank the following generals, Any Forums. Julius Caesar, Hannibal Barca, Napoleon Bonaparte, Khalid ibn al-Walid, Subutai, Alexander the Great, Scipio Africanus, Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus and Arthur Wellesley.
Low-level beings usually resorts to lowest means in order to thrive, a reminder for the closest to achievement to not leisure too much in their comfortable situation
>pussy little and ugly man unable to build anything unless outrageously providen for
>fight the cheapest pesky technics in battle
>literally archers (that's anglo-tier) also running away on horse (chevaliers used horse to charge in, not the way around)
>can only scorched earth if enemies don't surrender to their shit-tier civ, unlike romans/napoleon who civilized further onthe people or brought progress
We know the
>"khan died so had to go home"
myth is false becuase during the Mongolian conquest of Hungary the Mongols never conquered a stone fortress and all the Hungarian stone castles east of the Danube where the Mongols conquered remained under Hungarian control until the Mongol left.
en.wikipedia.org
Greasy dago wop
OP has as much in common with the Mongols as with French crusaders. Larping about Tangra and the endless grass sea won't bring back the horsetail flag