I was looking for information on the debate as to what the actual Congolese population was in 1880. I searched for the exact quote "was the population of the congo" and I get ZERO results. Delete the article "the" and I at least get one, but it's not relevant.
How is it possible that zero websites since the 1990s have had this quote in them that are left online?
Other urls found in this thread:
clio-infra.eu
twitter.com
I remember Alt Hype made a video debunking the 'genocide'
They must be losing control if they censor this hard.
Look up “drc population”
It’s 89.5m as of 2020, 94m as of 2022
not only are they censoring it but they are actively jew-washing it
No shit
Google has been censoring the entire internet since the creation of Alphabet.
At of 2016 they became willing to sell out that censorship to the highest bidder too.
and it's not just google
7.66 million
you just suck at searching
They have a list of hundreds of keywords to spike the algorithm. Google has gotten really for even normie topics lately.
what is yandex
Fuck, didn’t realize you were talking about the Congo Free State
Here’s the data:
clio-infra.eu
As you can see it’s 9.5m in 1880, then goes UP to 9.9m in 1890 before declining to 8.5m by 1910 (Congo Free State ended in 1908).
At MOST that means the Belgians killed about 1.4 million niggers, not “10 million” or whatever bullshit statistics BLM shits out.
Show me. And in any case, that quote still definitely shouldn't show zero results.
Jewgle has been censoring every genocide, congolese, cambodia, armenia, like you don’t know. I’ve been studying ways to build a case to sue google over shit like this for truth+gibs
Are they censoring the Cajun genocide in the same way?
white & genocided by the angloid, many such cases
If Cajuns ever do a political movement then I expect the censorship to go up
Yeah it's useless for anything outside of looking up the business hours of something, or shopping..that's it.
i turned the emu war from an satire argus news article into a internet fact using wikipedia using dubious sources.