"Asian" shouldn't be a racial category

whatever you say user, I'm not in the mood to disccus semantics with a troll.

Before the 15th century asians were considered white

5'9, Swarthy Med guy over here. The amount of Asian women I find hitting on me or trying to get me to hang out with them is fucking creepy. I think that they are trying to settle with a white man that closely resembles them or they know that 6 foot plus Hans isn't willing to put out for 5 foot 4 Pochan of Korea. My confidence lowers the more asian women hit on me now.

Because there's far more Indians and Pakistanis in England than east/southeast asians there. Compared to here when someone says Asian they're referring to Chinese and Vietnamese.

neither should "white"

You are genetically more similar to the person on the right than person on the left. Assuming that's a middle easterner.

Attached: genetic reality of race.jpg (572x532, 42.77K)

Kek, maybe they thought you looked Asian to them mf
Also you ain't white, literally always the most ugly son of a bitches think They're Le Aryan white race on this board

>British
It's the same in the US, friendo.

>Asian. A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam. This includes people who reported detailed Asian responses such as: "Asian Indian," "Chinese," "Filipino," "Korean," "Japanese," "Vietnamese," and "Other Asian" or provide other detailed Asian responses.

That said I agree that they are different races as do most anthropologists.

pmt

This is why the White race is doomed; all the racists want to live in the woods and be irrelevant.

premenstrual tension?

when westerners say asian it almost always means east asian

This argument disregards convergence in evolution.
Whites and Arabs have closer genetic origins than Whites and Asians, this is true.
But after 200,000 years of human evolution, Whites and Asians have more qualitatively in common than Whites and Arabs.
Also it's a Pakistani.

pretty much this

Attached: bemused gamer.gif (320x240, 3.73M)

Americans, yes. Not Britfags

Choose a side?

Suicide.

Attached: downloadfile(1).jpg (474x267, 9.38K)

that's incredibly sexist you chud. How did you know I'm a woman in her period? you were just guessing...

Look up the continent of Asia on a map, retard.

>you ain't white
Well, it could be worse... I could be Jewish.

>According to British racial categorizations, the person on the left and the "person" on the right are the same race.

No usually we would call the one on the right asian and the one on the left Chinese, Japanese etc.

Attached: 1654090674300.png (615x621, 419.37K)

That data is not from humans 200,000 years ago. Today, you are still genetically closer to the man on the right. You should also remember gooks don't have souls. They may look closer to whites, but they will watch a child get run over and not blink an eye.

Guy on the right is not asian goofo.

the caucasus is in europe, not in asia.

>when westerners say asian it almost always means one part of asia instead of the entire region

Okay, so from now on, I'll call only the North Europeans "European" and not, you know, anyone that lives in any region of Europe.

calm down, chica

Attached: madoka tacos.jpg (640x394, 96.43K)

...

No, you refer to the race in that region and not clump all the races of that region into one. The whole reason why a lot of people are classifying races as a clump is because of the American-Anglo Puritan doctrine being violated when the Civil War turned America into a constitutional Republic and try to incorporate more races in their country.

>This is why the White race is doomed; all the racists want to live in the woods and be irrelevant.

That has always historically been their environment though.