should i make political history threads to redpill the ignorant and young here on actual history instead of the revisionist kikery the zoomers currently learn for 12 years in school? it would be done in a textbook literary and academic fashion using actual sources and real photographs/imagery and take into account big picture stuff as well as specific fine details such as biopics on key figures. it would not be some faggot tiktok memeshit with 20 zoomer words and an emoji. we are talking at least 20 full posts due to the character limit
if there is any demand for such postings let me know and i will put together a few lessons and post them here in the coming days. feel free to suggest any topics of interest
thus far i was thinking topics such as the creation of the federal reserve banking system, the real reasons for secession in the american civil war, the communist revolution of russia, the maoist revolution of china, the american invasion of afghanistan, the british genocide of the irish and irish fight for independence, the rise and fall of the dutch empire, the causes of ww2. jus tspitballing but i think its important for zoomertards and generally most NPCs here to know the context of the events we live in today in relation to the past
No, don't do that. People will steal your work and post that on yt to earn views.
Aaron Howard
Legitimately would enjoy it OP Especially anything about the 19th Century Concert of Europe time when globohomo first started setting in; that transitioning to the World Wars and central banks, etc.
Liam Wilson
I would be interested in your perspective, however considering the demand here (most poltards are stuck arguing with federal agents, trannies and each other about who is white or should people race mix), Im not sure its a good idea. It'll just get buried under abhorrent posts. Cointelpro and its consequences...
Gabriel Sullivan
What’s your take on the history of the Roman Empire and it’s downfall?
Aaron Johnson
i considered youtube but i like being anonymous and youtube would censor anything (((problematic))) anyway. ive read hundreds of books and watched countless documentaries so i know many events and people well. i would avoid any bias as best as i can in presenting the lessons here but im tired of what ive seen in the community of historians lately. all mainstream historians cuck out on certain facts if its not politically correct. even the most "respected" historians of today in america and the UK are quite myopic and disingenuous especially when it comes to the touchy mainstream topics like the american civil war or rise of the third reich. its hard to see even so-called academics stoop to orangemanbad tier propaganda but watch any interview or chat with them about one of their latest books and youll get the full globohomo narrative experience
Answer this first. I don't mind if we have some disagreements, but if you are going to be spouting the typical nonsensical post-modern atheist bs; then I would say don't waste your time. If you actually so a thorough exploration and explain the context and so on and so forth; I'd love to read it.
Easton Wilson
Use the /his you stupid faggot who doesn't understand Any Forums. If you want to hang out here you need to compare current shit as it relates to old shit and why it matters. Nobody gives a shit you're a HISTORIAN here; what you really are is a faggot attempting to generate interest in your content, which is probably not as good as a Dan Carlin podcast where I also don't have to read your shit.
