>Herp derp censorship bad
>*literally deletes any comment disagreeing with him over petty things*
>*people tell him he is self contradictory all the time*
>Herp derp not its not
>*makes nonsense video how small channels can censor not big tech *
>*without realizing it actually argues for universal free healthcare, UBI and hardcore socialism*
Fat liberterian self contredicts himself
Benjamin Morales
Jordan Richardson
PS: This is about censorship I'm pro censorship and anti-free speech of any kind.
Caleb Thompson
fpbp
Benjamin Carter
I want you to remove this comment.
Colton Cox
Not watching fat faggots video, but he's right.
It's like the difference between having a place where everybody can get together with people they like vs having a place where a good chunk of society can't get in the doorway
Chase Jackson
>Not watching fat faggots video, but he's right.
No he is not.
>society can't get in the doorway
This literally made no sense whatsoever.
>but he's right.
Libertarians back in the day
>Ha only negative rights it is only censorship when the government dose it (mega corporation can de-platform you)
Libertarians now
>Awchually if you grow big enough
LOL.
The fagot basically invited anti trust and anti monopoly laws also
>If you need to go out of your way to have your frees peach in a place you need to drive to along way then it is not really free speech (???) (I'm presuming he is talking about staying on facebook VS going to some small forums)
So basically forced employed who a corporation must keep and give a job invited themselves into the conversation.
It is a load of nonsense and all libertarians are this kind of garbage.
Ans I'm the socialist in this discussion.
Joseph Nguyen
>I want you to remove this comment.
What did the brit bong mean by this ?
When I silence people I do not like = good
When my enemies get silenced = good.
When I get silenced = bad.
When my people get silenced = bad.
Is this so hard to understand for you?
And because aim anti free speech I will not wast anyone's time with by 200+ page easy on how I support free speech and this is not really denying anyone's free speech.
Asher Butler
>The fagot basically invited anti trust and anti monopoly laws also
Anti-trust and anti-monopoly are right in line with liberty. If you are for liberty, you're against tyranny. A monopolistic power usually tyrannical, that's why libertarians like small government.
Monopoly market is basically the opposite of a free market.
>So basically forced employed who a corporation must keep and give a job invited themselves into the conversation.
I don't really know what you're talking about here so i'll just say it's a strawman
Colton Carter
>Fat
Stropped reading here
Andrew Kelly
>Anti-trust and anti-monopoly are right in line with liberty.
AHAHAHAHAHA.
Nope not what libertarians shilled in the 2000s or what mises says.
Its like watching retarded children who got indoctrinated into the cult of liberterianism get burned and now change their views to SOCIALISM (the only right answer) while still trying to keep their liberterian lip service.
>I don't really know what you're talking about here so i'll just say it's a strawman
Liberteraism says
>If I need to drive out of the city to have my free speech in some shed it is inconvenient so therefore it is not free speech
Basically if facebook de platforms him.
VS
>If I need to drive out of the city to have my JOB in some shed it is inconvenient so therefore it is not FREEDOM
Ethan Diaz
why are you posting about some random retard on youtube?
Jeremiah Wright
>free market.
You realize the free market does not exist and can not exist ? Right ?
And the result of competition is always only corporation owning everything right ?
And you not living in this world is because of government regulations right ? Look up what anti trust laws are.
>Anti-trust and anti-monopoly are right in line with liberty.
You realize that Anti-trust and anti-monopoly are government regulations right ?
>Anti-trust and anti-monopoly are right
First time I see a libertarian call government regulation a right.
This is how the post liberterian world looks like lots of broken liberterian-bots.
Michael Myers
CALLING ALL FEDERAL AGENTS, NEETS, ANONS AND GLOWIES
/N/e/i/n/c/h/a/n/ dot com is backkkkkkk!!!!
Why the fuck are you still here.
No Jews
No shills
Robert Adams
Perfect example of the impossible self contradictory fantasy land of pro free speech.
Blake Williams
>Nope not what libertarians shilled in the 2000s or what mises says.
Lot of so-called libertarians are right wing minded jews who just don't want to vote republican (because it would help the goys).
You are just hearing different voices. This guy in your OP is not some bigshot jew libertarian, he's a regular guy.
I think rather than saying "but other guy said this", you should address the merits of the argument. Basically if you like a free society, you should want to prevent tyrannical forces from taking control of society and therefore yourself.
>You realize the free market does not exist and can not exist ? Right ?
Well it's an idealization. Real markets fall on a spectrum. If we say the free markets are good, then we can try to approach that idealization.
>And the result of competition is always only corporation owning everything right ?
No I don't think that's true even if that happens by chance, it's only going to be temporary. But let's suppose your right for sake of argument... .that doesn't mean competition is bad. It would just mean we need to destroy the ultimate monopoly that results and return the system to a competitive market. .
>You realize that Anti-trust and anti-monopoly are government regulations right ?
Libertarian isn't the same as ancap. Generally libertarians believe in a small government that preserves liberty as its primary function.
>First time I see a libertarian call government regulation a right.
not A right, but right in line with liberty
Ian Taylor
>No I don't think that's true.* Even if that happens by chance, it's only going to be temporary.
Elijah Garcia
>I think rather than saying "but other guy said this"
Translation:
>I call myself a ZIONISTS however I oppose jews, I'm still a Zionist
Words have meaning, why the fuck are these retards calling themselves libertarians ?
And I'm sure these retards got memed into liberterianism by mises.org
>Real markets
There are no markets because that is a meaningless word.
>No I don't think that's true
Then you are wrong. It is not only proven in simulations it is what we see in reality.
>that doesn't mean competition is bad
Most of the time competition is bad (this again is proven). Also competition is not real today when oligopolies basically are playing a pretend game that they are not a cartel trust.
You seriously need to stop repeating these trash liberterian/neocon/neo classical slogans.
>Libertarian isn't the same as ancap. Generally libertarians believe in a small government that preserves liberty as its primary function.
This means nothing and your answers (pro Anti-trust and pro anti-monopoly ) put you into direct oposition with misses.org.
>not A right, but righ
I'm sorry do you need to take your medications ?
Carter Sanchez
>>I call myself a ZIONISTS however I oppose jews, I'm still a Zionist
Nothing inconsistent about that. Zionism is a position on whether the jews should live in israel.
You can answer that affirmatively while also opposing them in other ways especially as an international mafia.
Similarly, The meaning of libertarian is someone who thinks the government should preserve liberty as a primary function. It's a belief in the inherent value of liberty as a part of society. It doesn't mean you agree with whatever mises says.
>There are no markets because that is a meaningless word.
Well whatever there are, they fall on a spectrum between even competition among many groups vs uneven tyrannical domination by a small number of groups.
>Then you are wrong. It is not only proven in simulations it is what we see in reality.
Simulations aren't reality. You say markets don't exist but simulations are real. You've got your head screwed on wrong.
>Most of the time competition is bad (this again is proven). Also competition is not real today when oligopolies basically are playing a pretend game that they are not a cartel trust.
You are saying we don't have competition, but that doesn't prove competition is bad.
>muh simulations
I can make a simulation that says they are good. Very easy to do that when you're the programmer.
>This means nothing and your answers (pro Anti-trust and pro anti-monopoly ) put you into direct oposition with misses.org.
How can it be in opposition when it has no meaning?
>I'm sorry do you need to take your medications ?
In english we use the word "right" in a few different ways.
Right in line means pointing in the same direction
Blake Davis
>Hey, it's a fat retard with a youtube channel that gets zero views
>I know; I'll post his videos on pol, then compare his retarded ideals to everyone who's against cencorship.
Please leave.
Austin Roberts
>Nothing inconsistent about that
Then have this clasic.
>I'm an atheist however I worship god and I'm a christian.
>The meaning of libertarian is someone who thinks the government should preserve liberty as a primary function. It's a belief in the inherent value of liberty as a part of society
This means nothing.
>. It doesn't mean you agree with whatever mises says.
Yet mises is the one who shilled this word to you ... and they say they are this .... and you are not ...
>Well whatever there are,
They do not exist you idiot never have never will prove market is anything other then a meaningless word.
>Simulations aren't reality
Yet they model reality ?
>You've got your head screwed on wrong.
Yes you idiot.
Try to justify objecting to FINANCIAL SIMULATIONS while believing in impossible things like markets. You can equally believe in magic pixies and astrology at this point
>Engendering is wrong because it is not reality, either way muh horoscope says
>You are saying we don't have competition, but that doesn't prove competition is bad.
You do not understand words
1) Competition is 90% of the time bad
END OF ARGUMENT
2) We do not have competition today
END OF ARGUMENT
These are 2 independent arguments.
>I can make a simulation that says they are good.
Actually you can not since you must follow match.
>I can make a simulation that says they are good.
LOL imagine writing this.
> Very easy to do that when you're the programmer.
You realzie most of them are made on paper. DO YOU EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT A FINANCIAL SIMULATION EVEN IS ?
>How can it be in opposition when it has no meaning?
Take yoru meds.
>How can
Anti-trust and anti-monopoly have meaning. Markets do not. You once again fail to use language correctly or understand it.
Jaxson Richardson
>NOOO REEE ONLY BIG e-celebs are allowed.
>then compare
You can use his rant as a starting point for the discussion or basically notice how fast pro free speech fagots self contradict themselves especially if you follow them over time.
Or simply jump into the discussion about free speech and deplatforming.
However free speech zealots can not do this because free speech is impossible to defend.
The pro free speech fagot deleting comments who call him out on minor things even is proof of this.