Morality without religion

You have to be a special kind of autistic retard to be able to ask that question without understanding the obvious categorical error you are making.

To write an entire book on it makes you truly one of a kind.

Scientific though disproves morality as a universal presence. That is to say that nature is wholly uncaring to your wants, feelings, and sense of fairness. But there is a natural underpinning in human society of kindness that alike creatures, largely on tribal and ethnic lines, will adopt a sense of order reflective of a concept of fairness so long as usefulness to the group's survival and wealth are upheld. But what is not true is morality in the sense as is commonly known to the majority of the world's populations, that have been born into universalist religions of choice, such as Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism. The only true religions are religions of family, tribe, and race. The only true morality is choosing for the benefit of your family, tribe, and race primarily, and then of your own health, wealth, joy, and will to power.

Morality is don't hurt other people. Simple as. Fuck you all for thinking it's more complicated.

No. Because morality is fake.

>don't hurt people
>there are whole races of people suffering from mental and emotional anguish over how much smarter and more attractive white people are compared to them

Can evil exist without free will

Attached: Christopher Langan.jpg (339x382, 19.31K)

Of course. He's a kike. That's what kikes do.

The bare minimum moral bylaws of safe and functional civilization are the ten commandments. It was worked out over hundreds, maybe thousands of years. A bunch of low test faggots don't need to do a bunch of experiments to find out something that has already been proven to work. Sciencefags just need to take the L on this one and move on.

Like an anchor point. Of good and evil
Reward and punishment
. Science states that even consciousness is questionable which makes the very idea questionable since it is a product of consciousness

Yes. The problem is that people don't like the answers when given as objectively as possible.

Example: The jew in your OP would instantly screech if it's mentioned we should model society around containing and disposing of niggers, who are more violent due to their backwards genetics. It is a scientifically and morally sound decision to make, with mountains of evidence to support the proposition, but we won't do it because it hurts people's ~feelings~.

Morality is religion

>The bare minimum moral bylaws of safe and functional civilization are the ten commandments.
Civilization existed before the "ten commandments", which are a modern invention, even existed. Exodus 34 has the only laws granted by your Yahweh that are explicitly called "commandments", and they deal mostly in blood/baby sacrifices (what a surprise). The things you call "ten commandments" were invented centuries later and are just based on ancient Greek Delphic maxims. Jews never once came up with them, and yet they're given credit for them. Neat how that works.

Religion,Moralism,Humanism are all Bullshit

Humans created laws before they created the ideas of religion ... Actions have consequences. Go from there.

Religion just simply gave certain people more control over others and used that religion to push a more 'moral' society where they were on top.

How do you honestly think feudalism and the catholic church operated?