So, we know that climate change is just bullshit to trick the goyim for more taxes and further restrictions. BUT...

So, we know that climate change is just bullshit to trick the goyim for more taxes and further restrictions. BUT, it is also true that the sun is being a dick and it's indeed sending more radiation to earth. so more heat for us.
they know this and use their knowledge to trick the masses but the question is. when will this glowing motherfucker take it easy and we get our old temperatures back?
>inb4 2 more weeks
>inb4 earth is flat and sun is a hologram
>inb4 OP can't inb4

Attached: The_Sun_by_the_Atmospheric_Imaging_Assembly_of_NASA's_Solar_Dynamics_Observatory_-_20100819.jpg (1073x1024, 306.05K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bitchute.com/video/RqfpqV9zViUm/
youtu.be/aEhRhAnIFns
youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4
youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxA
youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHw
youtu.be/iq3eh5q5xOg
youtu.be/aZqVA3c6j9s
youtu.be/OycaWIDR52g
youtu.be/2-RnSxUr08M
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>the sun is being a dick and it's indeed sending more radiation to earth. so more heat for us.
no

> bullshit just a trick
No.

holographic theory is legitimate physics.

a sphere is the flattest surface that you can build in the universe.

Our temperature has hardly changed. Increased C02 is probably the only thing holding back an ice age.

>BUT, it is also true that the sun is being a dick and it's indeed sending more radiation to earth.
You stupid ass mongrel. The sun is not the cause of this, the galaxy core is. The sun is not sending more radiation to earth, the earth's magnetic field is waning and letting more through.

>Our temperature has hardly changed
Zoomers dont remember how comfy the sun was in the 80s. Its whiter and more harsh now. It was more mellow and yellow back then, unironically. Back then, we had SPF 3, 5, 8 and 10. And if you looked hard you could find 15, which was so super powerful that you wouldnt get any sort of tan at all if you put it on and went to the beach at the ocean. Today they have spf 50, even spf100, and you pretty much dont see spf5 sold anywhere.

UV radiation has little to do with temperature.
The 80's were still setting Record Cold temperatures, after 4 decades of record cold tempteratures

Attached: 202107_Percent_of_global_area_at_temperature_records_-_Global_warming_-_NOAA.svg.png (1920x1440, 171.74K)

>UV radiation has little to do with temperature.
yes yes, we can just eliminate from the models everything that has little to do with things, and make sure that co2 is prominently featured in the equations. then we will scratch our heads when the models cant predict a fucking thing and might bump into reality as a blind cat bumps into a dead rat for a meal.

>So, we know that climate change is just bullshit to trick the goyim for more taxes and further restrictions

Ah, but you misunderstand. It's not bullshit, it's an EXCUSE for taxes and further restrictions.

No fool justifies a power grab without a reasonable excuse.

Attached: KangKodosPins_1875x.jpg (1875x1875, 310.88K)

maybe in the 1980s there was cloud seeding and "global dimming" projects

abbo, the earth's magnetic field was a hell of a lot stronger. faggots who need to omit inputs so as to inflate others for political reasons have no ground to stand on at this point in the game.

now go read about which bands are C02, which are H20, and which are you ignorance.

Attached: spectrum.png (1260x605, 139.76K)

>>inb4 earth is flat and sun is a hologram
No one knows for sure what the sun really is. But I've never heard about it being a "hologram". It's most certainly not a freaking hydrogen-helium ball burning for billions of years in a freaking vacuum. Hydrogen and helium belong to the most light weight elements, I hope you understand why this is retarded.
The earth is flat, sorry that you never took this subject seriously and never looked into it. They will censor more and at some point you will maybe not be able to research it anymore in the future. Except on your own, and you should do these tests really. The official mathematics of the ball are non-existent, the horizon is not 3 miles away. It's just that simple, the ball earth and all that belongs to this space idea is a lie. The only things that make you believe the earth is a ball is nasa cgi and fish lenses. And the people they put into your head since school, like Copernicus and Galileo, people that had far less technology, inferior optics than we have now. They could have only seen some small lights in the sky, as we do. Nothing could make you come to the conclusion that these lights are huge terra firma worlds, it's all retarded nonsense and science fiction. They are self-luminous obviously. But you are raised to believe the school-book authority, and don't trust your own sense and eyes. Trust your senses, trust your eyes, what you see is actually true. At balloon altitude (>100000 ft) you see a flat earth for hundreds and even a thousand miles. Completely level surface. And remember the ball math that tells you that on the beach the physical horizon is supposed to be 3 miles away, exponentially going down.
Godspeed.

bitchute.com/video/RqfpqV9zViUm/
youtu.be/aEhRhAnIFns
youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4
youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxA
youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHw
youtu.be/iq3eh5q5xOg
youtu.be/aZqVA3c6j9s
youtu.be/OycaWIDR52g
youtu.be/2-RnSxUr08M

Attached: Spaceballs.png (10000x1691, 1.67M)

Watch some of Tony Hellers stuff and ignore all the b/s on the tv

Attached: solar_radiation_spectrum.jpg (1920x1030, 658.93K)

co2 is not a driver of the climate in any way shape or form, you are an NPC if you think it is

space is not a total vacuum, dipshit

0bsesrved. climate change is the scapegoat for what the sun is going to do to us in the coming decades.

That is correct for the most part, the co2 layer ends up on the outer edge of the reflection spectrum, but its main correlation is by allowing plants to cause more h2o to enter the air. This is most of the mechanism keeping the ice age away.
Just find a graph of global precipitation and it matches nicely with temp anomaly.

Attached: Atmospheric_Transmission-en.svg.png (1280x1251, 201.71K)

So long as GCMs have their shit tier averaged approximation for "Total" soar irradiance, there will forever be room left by the omissions to be filled with co2, by charlatans. Its by design, a realization was made from trying to blame humans for the natural creation and destruction mechanism for ozone long ago.

If you search for a precipitation chart in google, you are flooded with temperature charts. They are trying to hide the sham.

they don't account for all of the incoming solar radiation, they assign that extra energy to co2. that's why their models consistently fail time and time again. they can't update the models to reflect true solar radiance because the veil would lift and their grift would end.

I wonder if anyone has tried to quantify the eddy current thermal effect on the oceans from the magnetic/electric currents like they do for metals in sensitive engineering for unwanted induction.

The tides are not gravitational powered, so there is a shit ton of energy at work there.

Temperatures are up because aerosols from chemtrails trap the radiating heat, keeps it from leaving the atmosphere after its first bounce.
Day-night differential used to be 12 degrees Celsius. Last summer it was 3 degrees, this summer it's 6-7 degrees.
This is because fights have been going up to spray vinegar which takes the aerosols down.

The 80s were hot af and then the 90s were cold. At least that's how it was in Vancouver.