Why are women like this?

I'm not so sure anybody thinks they can change a pittbull. I think a woman would want a pitbull for the same reason anybody else would, because they want a dog able to maul someone else to death.

Women want what a man wants and a man wants a woman that can look up to him and at the same time both being above everything else

change =/= tame
Can you turn something dangerous in a direction that suits you?
That's what I meant

Women dont value men the same way men value women in general. You've got men and women competing over the same pool of resources now financially, but women and men still want a wealth differential, but women want hvm to have more and men would prefer that women to have less, but only because men know that women don't want to provide for men if they have any choice in the matter. Men are downranked for having less, it women are downranked by age regardless of wealth.
The female equivalent of a guy going overseas to find a poor woman for a bride isn't a women doing that for a husband, it's just importing top notch Danish sperm for IVF after freezing their eggs

Attached: Screenshot_20220616-165447_Edge.jpg (1440x3200, 1.14M)

Bump

Attached: Screenshot_20220616-165702_Edge.jpg (1440x3200, 1.05M)

This isn't right. You have more female ancestors than male ancestors

bump because it's an interesting thread in a sea of shit

Attached: 1655357767557.jpg (661x732, 60.12K)

Because those ancestries are most likely the results of rape done by conquerors. Your point actually reinforces mine

>Your point actually reinforces mine
No, the idea that women had 0 choice and everything was rape is wrong. You're buying into feminist critiques.

>women had 0 choice and everything was rape is wrong.
Women have zero choices not because they can't make an informed choice but because they ultimately end making all the same choice no matter what: they go for the dark triad because the dark triad share the same traits of the men that can an will take the women by force. Women have ingrained in their dna a preference for that kind of male because that was the male that was most successful at reproduction. That's the reason why a matriarchal society isn't possible.

>You're buying into feminist critiques.
Feminists constantly dance around the real issue which while it's true that women are raped even conceptually but it also true that it's part of their nature and most importantly they WANT that to happen.

>they go for the dark triad because the dark triad share the same traits of the men that can an will take the women by force
Yes. It's a "choice". You're stripping agency from women the same way they do to themselves in the spirit of empowerment.
It doesn't matter if it's a choice downstream from cunt tingles.

>importantly they WANT that to happen.
Ok, we kind of agree then. I don't really separate biologically integrated preferences from choices, because that strips agency from people. If I don't do it for men I'm not doing it for women either. That's my idea of equality.

Well if the willing choice of an individual coincide with an eventuality forced on them anyway do you call it free choice? To me is just coping, Stockholm syndrome at best. Can women take a different path? Ultimately not, even their reproductive cycle exacerbate these preferential traits at its peak no matter how much the woman preferential parameters diverged from that in their normal unaroused state.

Men on the other hand are literally build to die in trying new evolutionary paths, therefore can actually express free choice.