reminder that ((they)) want to identify you as someone of "cock-asian" ethnicity. never give in, you are a proud White man.
Reminder that ((they)) want to identify you as someone of "cock-asian" ethnicity. never give in...
Other urls found in this thread:
>"cock-asian" ethnicity
caucasian is a race (caucasoid race)
funny too, because caucasian has been proven to be complety debunked pseudoscience
europeans are aryans (high IQ asiatic steppe conquerors)+native europeans (cro magnons or sand niggers, most of them were exterminated by the aryans when they moved into europe)
there is no such thing as caucasian races, ethiopians are not related to indo europeans
>caucasian is a race (caucasoid race)
no
>caucasian has been proven to be complety debunked pseudoscience
nope
>ethiopians are not related to indo europeans
ethiopians are a mix of caucasoid and negroid
there was a thread about this on stormfront and the guy who said caucasoid was a nonsense term got DEBUNKED
Too late, I already identify as that
>nope
amerimutts are a walking joke
Pic related is the map of human races according to US laws and the imigration Census
>this is your brain on skull type pseudoscience
Anything that asks me my race and lists Caucasian, I fill in "other." If there's a slot to specify, I put "Aryan."
It's not even wrong, I'm not from the caucuses. They either let me be White, or I'm going to be Aryan.
>the Sudanese are white
I can get over some things like Italians not being latins (?), but how are Sudanese, the blackest motherfuckers on earth, white
>amerimutts are a walking joke
nope. many of the best anthropologists were from the US. for example, carleton coon
>Pic related is the map of human races according to US laws and the imigration Census
"hispanic" is never considered a racial category, so that's just bogus. additionally, jews were the ones that decided on those categories just to mask whites becoming minorities quicker
You mean EVROPEAN, right?
they're not. some goofball made up the map
"hispanic/latino" is not even a racial category. indians are classified as "caucasian" (which is equated with white). north africans are also classified as caucasian. spaniards and portuguese are classified as caucasian as well. central/south american doesn't have a racial group. most should put "mixed" but they usually put white, and then check yes in the yes/no box for hispanic
>but how are Sudanese, the blackest motherfuckers on earth, white
well they have a "caucasoid" skull type, and according to retards in america caucasoid isn't a pseudoscience so I guess they just have to be white!
hawaii would also be pacific islander. fact is, the map is bullshit because anyone can put whatever they want on it and 'hispanic/latino' isn't a racial group
don't go being ignant now ya hear
>nope. many of the best anthropologists were from the US.
cope
>"hispanic" is never considered a racial category
neither is caucasoid, it doesn't exist
aryans are more closely related to native americans than they are to nordics, have fun making sense of that with your skull shape 17th century nonsense, anyone who disagrees with genetics is mentally ill
Sorry, I'm Eurasian.
>according to retards in america caucasoid isn't a pseudoscience so I guess they just have to be white!
"caucasoid" wasn't invented in the USA as a concept, but in europe centuries ago. american anthropogists just agreed with it and continued the work
"sudan" isn't listed specifically, it just says "north africa"
>cope
not at all
>neither is caucasoid, it doesn't exist
caucasoid is literally a racial category, created as such, and has been for centuries
"hispanic/latino" has never been and was never meant to be
>aryans are more closely related to native americans than they are to nordics
1. what does that have to do with anything?
2. define "native americans" and "nordics"
3. prove it
> have fun making sense of that with your skull shape 17th century nonsense
please substantiate your absurd claims champ
>anyone who disagrees with genetics is mentally ill
caucasoid is a genetic reality though. the issue is you're looking at MIXED GROUPS and trying to assign them any other label than "mixed with ____ and ____"
based
They don't even have the IQ of Egypt. And that's saying something for Caucasoid.
>caucasoid is literally a racial category, created as such, and has been for centuries
yes, it's bullshit several centuries old and disproven by actual science and genetics
>1. what does that have to do with anything?
your bullshit theories claim both of them are "caucasoid" when a "mongoloid race" is more closely related to a caucasoid one that two "cacasoid" ones
>2. define "native americans"
is this a fucking joke?
>and "nordics"
Nordic Hunter Gathered (NHG) populations
>3. prove it
dumb cunt, here
the memes you posted are scientifically accurate so please don't fall for 17th century pseudoscience like skull shape as a defining factor for races and how they relate to each other, use only genetics
I obliviously agree that east africans have no relation to europeans, so does genetics, but according to skull shape theory, all the east african who have a caucasoid skull shape are part of the same race as caucasoids, which is why sudanese are considered "white" by the US census on race
which is obliviously nonsense
>disproven by actual science and genetics
not at all. you're using only y-dna when we should be looking at autosomal
>your bullshit theories claim both of them are "caucasoid" when a "mongoloid race" is more closely related to a caucasoid one that two "cacasoid" ones
prove it now
>is this a fucking joke?
please define it. i've been in the USA since before the revolutionary war. how am i not native american?
it's not a racial group at all
>Nordic Hunter Gathered (NHG) populations
so you're not talking about modern populations?
>dumb cunt, here
your Y-DNA shit proves nothing except some african clades are more closely related to non-afican. try again faggot
>use only genetics
the caucasoid race are a mutt race of different groups hybridizing that are not separate sub-species/races
>according to skull shape theory, all the east african who have a caucasoid skull shape are part of the same race as caucasoids
nobody thinks east africans are straight up caucasoid, they are a caucasoid-negroid mix
>why sudanese are considered "white" by the US census on race
nobody gives a shit about US census. nobody is endorsing their classifications
>i've been in the USA since before the revolutionary war.
gets more schizo with every word
>so you're not talking about modern populations?
I am talking about racial groups that actual exist, modern populations, nordics especially, are mixed race, NHGs were completely unmixed and racially pure, and are the largest contributer to nordic DNA, as well as the group from which nordic features like blond hair and blue eyes come from
>your Y-DNA shit proves nothing
you are not qualified or mentally equiped to be having this conversation
>gets more schizo with every word
my family at least
>I am talking about racial groups that actual exist, modern populations, nordics especially, are mixed race, NHGs were completely unmixed and racially pure, and are the largest contributer to nordic DNA, as well as the group from which nordic features like blond hair and blue eyes come from
ok now prove your goofy claims
>you are not qualified or mentally equiped to be having this conversation
Y-DNA only tells you about the paternal ancestor. show us the autosomal evidence. your claims aren't even supported by your "sources" el retardo