RV video from 2017 describing weird clots

remote viewer describes recent clot findings in a video posted in 2017
youtube.com/watch?v=E930RNiCUOM

vid of mortician showing what he finds in injection victims
banned.video/watch?id=62a7ba3fd3003e1cb461bc00

article showing microscopic images of the things
naturalnews.com/2022-06-12-blood-clots-microscopy-suddenly-died.html

previous thread for which i was issued a warning for off topic/non political
so for the sad wannabe woman which he will never be is the following link
remoteviewed.com/remote_viewing_history_military.htm

Attached: rv clotterino.png (1078x1857, 2.07M)

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961221001058
patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32254085/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33816465/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33059341/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

virgin janny fears the chad schizoposter

Bump, this is relevant to my political interests
Will pfizer apologize?

I took the jab.
I haven't felt anything suspicious.
Therefore your argument is invalid.

It totally does not look like the immortal cancer from Henrietta that they use as the base for their test...

i wish it was a schizo topic so i take it as a compliment

Attached: Edible graphene.png (616x2726, 957.82K)

Attached: brain mapping with graphene transistors.jpg (5883x6294, 3.94M)

yesterday's thread
although OP has a different opinion on what it is

Do you think Apple will sue for putting music on an apple?
Also using the owl as a symbol, they aren't subtle with this one, are they?

have they ever?

Attached: Pfizer track record.jpg (4000x4000, 2.06M)

I love schizo posts but they really belong on /x/.

>Also using the owl as a symbol, they aren't subtle with this one, are they?
not really, no
>Graphene oxide prevents lateral amygdala dysfunctional synaptic plasticity and reverts long lasting anxiety behavior in rats
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961221001058
dude there's nothing /x/ about this, it's nano tech. want some science journal links?

I watched the video yesterday. Boring and a waste of my time. Nothing substantial in it. Everybody who claims it describes anything related to the clot shot is seeing ghosts.

Attached: 711.jpg (600x578, 43.39K)

Schizo posts make the board interesting. It's fine if you wanna sit here and post about DA JOOS endlessly, but that got boring a while ago.

you're the austrian vax shill
why is it so important to inject as many people as possible with a product that doesn't stop the spread or severity of the disease? can't be just greed.

patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en

Attached: GO vaccine patent.png (665x304, 33.22K)

another thread about clots
and this
Even though graphene oxide is made with the same atoms as our organs, tissues and cells, its bi-dimensional nature causes unique interactions with blood proteins and biological membranes and can lead to severe effects like thrombogenicity and immune cell activation.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32254085/

member the vax effect on pregnancy?

Attached: graphene placenta.jpg (1170x2291, 1002.74K)

Is remote viewing also future viewing? How does it work?

Attached: 1654815238675.jpg (640x640, 34.47K)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33816465/
Notably, GO or rGO treatment increased the content of ROS and reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential in H9C2 cells. In vivo experiments also revealed that GO or rGO treatment damaged the myocardial tissues and changed the activities of several myocardial enzymes and the lipid peroxidation indicators in the myocardial tissues.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33059341/
A wound healing assay demonstrated no effect of GO on cell migration. We also found that small-flaked GO favoured the proliferation of VSMCs, suggesting a potential of using surface chemistry or physical properties of GO to influence cell growth behaviour. These results provide insight into the suitability of GO as a scaffold for vascular tissue engineering.

>How does it work?
i don't really know and i guess nobody does but they aren't bound by time or space. i watched one accurately describe terrorist attacks a month in advance. on fucking youtube

>How does it work?
It doesn't, in all cases they scored lower than analysts would when given the same subject to expand upon.