>"There had been a struggle. His hands were bruised, his knees are bruised, his face is bruised, and yet he had two shots to his back, and yet they never took anything," Rich's mother, Mary, told NBC shortly after his death. >“Our sources take risks,” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in an interview with a Dutch television program, just after addressing Rich’s murder.... Implying that he was a source for WikiLeaks and was exposing the DNC, was caught and then shot.
So, questioning things that dont add up is now wrong? Why has there been no extensive investigation of this incident? No extensive coverage? He was a political member of the DNC, he was murdered with 2 shots in the back and they called it a "botched robbery". 1. Nothing was stolen 2. He was executed 3. No national coverage 4. Killer never found 5. Conspiracies involving what and who he was involved with raises even more questions.
No one knows for sure what happened but it's better to find out years down the line and keep the case open rather than just call it a random "botched robbery" and leave it be. That only helps conspiracies solidify. It's like someone is intentionally trying to kill this story.
Could it really just be a random D.C. nigger or 2 that killed him after a fight for his belongings?
Because the FBI killed him No one actually doubts it Libtards know, they’re just waiting for a good cover to run with. Everyone knows.
We’re all just waiting for the shooting to start, if you haven’t realized we’re in a civil war.
Sebastian Turner
>Could it really just be a random D.C. nigger or 2 that killed him after a fight for his belongings? DC niggers are a dangerous breed, so potentially. I thought his murder was weird because that area doesn't normally have a lot of niggers running around in it, but they have been known to skulk around the capitol, so they could've found their way there. DC is a big city, that anywhere there is a metro station you have a risk of encountering niggers.
It makes it really weird that they didn't take anything. If niggers had done it, they would've at least taken his shoes or phone. They wouldn't be smart enough to cut their loses and run.
>Could it really just be a random D.C. nigger or 2 that killed him after a fight for his belongings? It could, it's equally possible they were hired to rough him up and went to far. Across the set of all possible things that could have lead to Seth Rich's murder one of those things is botched robbery. I'd give it around a 2%-5% probability. But it's certainly a probability.
Hunter Martin
Fucking hell, you lot are getting desperate. The shills are now shilling Seth rich material. Imagine le absolute state of shilling if this is a slide thread.
Eli Kelly
>1. Nothing was stolen
If it was just street crime why did DC police rush to his apartment and grab his computer. By what lawful authority did they do that? Then they gave it to the FBI who promptly "lost" it.
He leaked the info about Hillary and Huma's DNC email server in their bathroom and then somebody wasted his ass, had his computer taken away to find out who he was in cahoots with and the FBI just dissapeared it.
Aiden Wright
I was being sarcastic, dumbass.
Julian Thompson
Also Hillary/DNC has refused to turn over their email bathroom server to the FBI and Hillary has refused to answer questions about it to FBI agents under oath.
Austin Flores
>I was being sarcastic, dumbass.
It's a mute point.
Julian Brooks
He was alive when he got to the hospital. A hospital run by a corrupt union that Clinton also had ties to.
Nathaniel Barnes
When asked if he was implying that Rich was a source for WikiLeaks, which on July 22 released thousands of emails from DNC accounts — centering around Clinton, her campaign and the DNC's treatment of Sen. Bernie Sanders — Assange cryptically responded.
“We don’t comment on our sources,” he said. “We have to understand how high the stakes are on the case.”
