How can Any Forums refute this? It's literally impossible

It really do be like that tho.

Attached: th-3008242970.jpg (474x474, 36.5K)

what's the point of bot spamming these threads anyway?
you don't understand anything about anything

and free speech only applies to 17th century press

You could also own shit you can't own now like automatic small arms (yes, did exist already), explosives and war ships. Bring civilian ownership of those back first then we can talk.

Libtards are being paid big shekels to shill here.
Bbc and this garbage in particular

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Maybe it's time for you to shut the fuck up, commie.

Because there is no 18th century law regulating firearms?

I'll always bump these shitty shill bait threads.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Niggers tongue my hairy anus

Attached: 288183039_1073970246548337_6626338556964190263_n.jpg (720x667, 23.03K)

This. When I can have a crank operated multiple barrel automatic cannon. We can discuss updating this to include modern non crank operated multiple barrel automatic cannons. Since the crank was replaces with a motor with the invention of electronics. It would seem to be common sense to update the law to include modern technology

>The Puckle gun (also known as the defence gun) was a small crew-served, manually-operated flintlock revolver patented in 1718 by James Puckle (1667–1724), a British inventor, lawyer and writer. It was one of the earliest weapons to be referred to as a "machine gun", being called such in a 1722 shipping manifest, though its operation does not match the modern use of the term. It was never used during any combat operation or war.
>Puckle demonstrated two configurations of the basic design: one, intended for use against Christian enemies, fired conventional round bullets, while the second, designed to be used against the Muslim Turks, fired square bullets. The square bullets were considered to be more damaging. They would, according to the patent, "convince the Turks of the benefits of Christian civilization". The weapon was also reported as able to fire shot, with each discharge containing sixteen musket balls.

By that logic, the constitution only applies to straight white men American men, you have no say, and neither do I

>using completely debunked shit as bot spam

You could at least try. All fields.

Men is so important I said it twice

You were allowed to have the same weapons as the government provides to the military.

>op
I get it bro. lol and all that or whatever. when it comes to guns, it's about equality. trust me, if others had modern artillery back then, those who constructed the constitution would absolutely want it as well. this is such a poorly thought argument that op posted. Very infantile and basically retarded.

That's right. All MEN were created equal. Now get me another hot coffee BOY!

At the time, those rifles were the ones used by the military. The law guaranteed military-grade assault weapons to ordinary people so they could form their own militia and have a personal stake in their basic rights and freedoms.

>"convince the Turks of the benefits of Christian civilization"
Holy shit, fucking based.

Attached: 1649080791345.png (680x689, 527.82K)

Cool, we doing that with all the amendments? Why don't you worry about your faggot county and ignore ours?

that's what they don't get. fucking no one had modern weaponry back then, obviously. i mean it's fucking obvious. painfully so. but those who parrot that talking point are just stupid as fuck. that's all there is to it. if one repeats something so profoundly stupid so many times and they never catch on to the flaw well that makes them legitimately diagnosable as retarded.

Fuck

Attached: onmywaytogetcoffee.jpg (612x408, 46.09K)

Щe тe нapeжa нa пapчeтa c pъждив тpиoн.