Why is ancient world is more interesting?

>Than medieval and modern ages?
it was untainted by the stain of judeochristianism

Attached: -.jpg (1000x454, 85K)

because the people aren't around

would be the same otherwise

>Ancients were far more advanced and sophisticated than the generations that came after.
correct, and it wasn't just random slow societal decay, it was every library book and school being burned down all at once accross the whole continent, europeans being enslaved into serfdom and feudalism, at the same time as famines plagues and massacres by the roman emperors on their own population

Attached: Alexandria.jpg (2855x1281, 1.59M)

>Jews were killed off repeatedly, which was based and redpilled
which did not happen a single time in christian europe

Attached: codex theodasianus.jpg (2000x3131, 2.02M)

The ancient world didn't have modern technology and computers to calculate efficient answers to problems. Trial and error and creative solutions were the main tools used by ancient civilisations to grow. Everything had more soul.

They were also more individualistic and had more community at the same time. which might sound paradoxical but hear me out. the local community part is obvious. but they were non conformant to idiotic authority. They didn't listen to anyone but themselves and the pastor. they were non conformant. while in modern society. people are ultra conformant to hyper atomized utlra hedonistic group think "individualism". aka you are individualistic as long as it is allowed by the group. we have freedom as long as its unconsequential. no one cares what clothes you wear. what food you eat. what religion you believe in. what you fuck. as long as you coomply with regulation and support the current psy op. as long as you practice sin it doesn't matter. but if you dare to question if this type rampant group-think-hyper-"individualism" is bad. and you lose your job. get your kids taken away. etc..

>people were far more free to do their thing.
roman empire:
>you can legally own things,
>you can safely travel accross the entire empire without being robbed or attacked
>most people know how to read and write
>thousands of libraries you can go to in order to learn about the natural world, technologies and history
>running water in every large-ish city
>beautiful magestic european architecture

medieval period:
>you cannot own anything by law, infact YOU are private property
>you are tied to a crop field, and you will be killed if you are found outside of your feudal master's estate
>if you make your own mill or oven you will be tortured and killed for the crimie of seeking self reliance
>literacy rate of 0% by rounding error
>books are highly illegal object that must imediately be given to the clergy if found so that they may either be confiscated in a monastery or imediately burned
>anyone who questions the power of the kings, church, or jews get tortured then burned alive
>anyone who disrespects a "noble" gets killed, even if the noble made up the entire incident
>in fact nobles can be john podesta and are legally allowed to kidnap and rape your kids, even kill them, they don't need an island to hide in it's legal for them
>kings owe in debt worth several times their entire kingdom loans to jews
>not a single place in europe left with running water, hygiene itself being banned as paganism for several centuries
>priests/antifa mobs literally going around smashing up western monuments and statues, and then having to live in the ruins for the next 1200 years in despair
>no architecture for hundreds of years, you would be lucky if you lived in a house made out of mud and cow shit (daube)

totally the same, way more freedom

Attached: 1556935562401.jpg (1233x1710, 798.19K)

the dark ages are called so because Rome was no more, were it not for the ruins they left behind medieval feudalism would've been more akin to barabrism in mudhuts

>Why is ancient world more interesting
- more remote time, so more mysteries
- less homogenized, filled with highly dynamically competitive cultures and world views
- closer to the bedrock foundation of everything that followed

Attached: curio.jpg (400x311, 46.76K)

A more civilized time, before the dark times, before the Jews.

The ancient world was full of diverse cultures especially in the East. Now it's a desert wasteland inhabited by mongrels. The Adamic world was reduced to Celto-Germanic cultures by the medieval age. Imagine an all you can eat restaurant with the special dishes from every corner of the globe.

>>you can legally own things,
if you are rich yes. otherwise the city owns it. or rich politicians can confiscate your stuff at any time they want. and nobody gives a fuck.
>>you can safely travel accross the entire empire without being robbed or attacked
if you are rich sure.
>>most people know how to read and write
if you are part of the rich aristocracy sure. greek and romans put very high empasis on literacy so overall romans were probably more literate. def more literate in high society. but there are just a bunch of completely false myths about the middle ages. like 0% literacy. that is absolutely not true. most people could read and write. literacy wasn't created out of nowhere with the printing press. it sure expanded it. but not create it.
>>thousands of libraries you can go to in order to learn about the natural world, technologies and history
you know what a clergy is? a significant part of the population were in clergies and in the church. also "technologies" I am not exactly sure by what you mean. the romans and greeks had this weird idea about the natural world where experiments are basically useless and inferior to pure deduction. that is why they never experimented with anything. but argued about stuff. In the middle ages more stuff was invented than previously. partly because in the middle ages people thought differently.
>>running water in every large-ish city
big cities had that as well. don't quite know what is this point. also most people did not live in cities at all. neither in Roman nor periods after that. because the population is so diffuse. there is no point in having that. its very expensive to build that. regardless of period. the Romans liked to constantly debase their money. to pay for wars and great public works. Keep the slaves from rising.

>>beautiful magestic european architecture
I don't know about france. but all we have a bunch of architecture from the middle ages. you would need to go to Italy to get more Roman stuff. gothic stuff? castles? does that ring a bell? But also I am mostly talking about pre industrial society. so perhaps I should have included that the pre industrial proto "modernity" period.

I don't think that you actually studied the middle ages all that well. I know that there is a lot of myths out there about what was life like. most of our images of barbarism originates from the renaissance and enlightenment. Which is not true at all in the slightest.

> dark ages
that originates from the based bois during the enlightenment. there was no sudden change of life after the middle ages vs the enlightenment. it was mostly in a shift the in the arts and based boi philosophers. life was basically the same. for the most part. with very incremental improvements. and incremental population growth. a bit larger cities. nothing like going from that to industrial society. where populations exploded. cities exploded in size. etc.