Why is it that whenever someone talks about "white genocide" people just say "you're racist" and never deny that "white...

Why is it that whenever someone talks about "white genocide" people just say "you're racist" and never deny that "white genocide" is happening?

Attached: avatars-000572598885-i6sm3l-t500x500.jpg (500x500, 36.86K)

Because they all agree that it should happen. And they don't want it to be known as public knowledge. Zionists are the ones that created the racist meme to counter our attempted retaking of the country.

Jewish conditioning. It is unfathomable to them that white people can be victims.

It's not about facts it's about power. Power of discourse. Most normies won't admit anything because they can't. They are just sheeps and puppets. How can puppets admit to a plan or a goal?

fpbp

They have been well trained to make the knee-jerk “racist,” accusation. They are also scared of talking about it openly.

Attached: CE8B1392-336E-4485-B2BB-8C8CE17082CF.jpg (1024x812, 217.23K)

>Why is it that whenever someone talks about "white genocide" people just say "you're racist"
because that's how they were trained to respond
it's not any more complicated than that

No, they admit it's happening when they say it's a good thing.

the same reason as why you can't question holocaust

Because it's not real and if it was that would be a good thing

You're racist

Why is that whenever someone talks about "white genocide" they next explain why the other races involved in the mixing aren't getting genocided?

because the other races aren't getting genocided

So how's that work? 1 black + 1 white => 1 black?

The only genocide is the mass dieoff of your braincells, chud.

Attached: 29a.png (645x770, 16.07K)

Plenty deny it. They call it a conspiracy theory that is wrong.
But they will also say that it should happen in another breath. It's always a tactical answer.

Their countries have above replacement fertiliity rates and are not flooded with mass migration of racially different peoples.

Idgaf about mass immigration at this point but the result of current trends is obvious and I'll use a simple analogy since you're America:
If you have one jar with cola and one with milk and you tip some of the cola into the milk jar, you no longer have a jar of pure milk but still have a jar with pure cola

If the problem is fertility rates then why does this alleged genocide matter? Even in absence of immigrants, their population would outgrow white population and the effect would basically be the same. In fact, every 100 immigrants they send erodes their long term advantages in absolute number because they suicide to take out 100 whites for a net 0 gain whereas if they stayed and bred at home their gain would be >0 on account of higher fertility rate.

the problem is low fertility combined with intentional mass migration

>their population would outgrow white population
non-white populations already outgrew whites and it's not an issue as long as they stay in their respective countries