Russia let Jews capture their country in 1917. Why?
Russia let Jews capture their country in 1917. Why?
William Turner
Josiah Baker
Cause they throw around the capital they've been hoarding since antiquity
Noah Jones
Robert Miller
The monarchy degenerated to degree that people found it an acceptable alternative. Let that be a lesson or more countries will join the club with france and russia
Connor Russell
The Russian is inherently weak. He cannot be blamed for this, it is simply in his nature going back thousands of years.
Nathaniel Lewis
They were communists, not jews. Russia's history of tsarism, feudalism and capitalism led them to abject misery. There was a 27 year life expectancy at one point for the Russians under capitalism. Communism provided them with more rights than anyone had ever experienced in history. More rights than we have here in the USA for sure. The problems arose from the wealthy who fought a civil war basically for fascism. The bolsheviks won but problems arose from the "kulaks" whom the bolsheviks had treated leniently and let them keep large plots of land, despite their organized political opposition against communism and in favor of fascism.
After about a decade of kulaks causing problems, sabotaging agriculture, causing mass famines and other shit, the soviets didn't want to put up with them anymore so fascists got eradicated in the USSR.
Today, our US state department and capitalist propagandists try to propagandize this as being "bad" but it wasn't. It was good. Stalin did good
Mason Stewart
By controlling the newspapers, publishers, and financial systems - the Russians had no idea who was behind the (((revolution)))
Robert Martin
>>/leftypol/
Connor Collins
>They were communists, not jews. Russia's history of tsarism, feudalism and capitalism led them to abject misery. There was a 27 year life expectancy at one point for the Russians under capitalism. Communism provided them with more rights than anyone had ever experienced in history. More rights than we have here in the USA for sure. The problems arose from the wealthy who fought a civil war basically for fascism. The bolsheviks won but problems arose from the "kulaks" whom the bolsheviks had treated leniently and let them keep large plots of land, despite their organized political opposition against communism and in favor of fascism.
>After about a decade of kulaks causing problems, sabotaging agriculture, causing mass famines and other shit, the soviets didn't want to put up with them anymore so fascists got eradicated in the USSR.
>Today, our US state department and capitalist propagandists try to propagandize this as being "bad" but it wasn't. It was good. Stalin did good
And important to note that kulaks were a "class" and a certain political opposition. Not a race or ethnicity. It wasn't a "genocide" or "ethnic cleansing" it was a class warfare because the soviets did not want to live under what happened in nazi germany a few years later
The kulaks were essentially nazis. Not in name but same set of ideas. No difference between stalin killing kulaks and US GIs killing nazis in WW2
William Green
Tsarist Russia was an unironic hell-hole ruled by an incompetent idiot who stumbled the country into a pointless war. It was inevitable that he'd be thrown out of power and it was inevitable that the retards who wanted to continue his war afterwards would also lose.
Benjamin Wood
Jeremiah Murphy
Documentaries for you to watch.
>Hervé Ryssen – The Jews, Communism and The (((Russian))) Revolution (completely in french but has subtitles)
files.catbox.moe
>The Jewish Crucifixion of Russia
files.catbox.moe
Isaac Clark
I have heard this before. Something about weakness beginning in the East and gradually each race gets stronger as you move West. It is an interesting theory.
>After about a decade of kulaks causing problems, sabotaging agriculture, causing mass famines and other shit, the soviets didn't want to put up with them anymore so fascists got eradicated in the USSR.
Opposite. (((Bolsheviks))) got rid of the kulaks and then had a citizenry who didn't know how to farm efficiently. It was a retarded move.
Matthew Clark
If by "let them take over" you mean "bloody civil war" then the answer is "Jews worm their way into opportunity and power through propaganda."
Isaac Green
Ty user
Parker Perry
That's not actual history you just recited in response to me. Just to be clear. That's something you made up as part of rightwing propaganda. It's entirely random
Grayson Myers
Some short videos that focus solely on the overthrow of the Tsar. Whether you trust Anthony C. Sutton is up to you, many people debate is assessment of Nazi Germany and Wall St. and say he had it wrong, but he provides an explanation of Rockefeller crypto Jews involved etc.
files.catbox.moe
>The Jews Who Murdered Tsar Nicholas II
files.catbox.moe
>Bolshevik overthrow of Tsar
files.catbox.moe
Aaron Evans
Because Russia loves Jews, time to denazify the world fr fr
Levi Evans
>They were communists, not jews
lol, lmao.
Levi Long
What the fuck, not even Stalin himself believed this absolute fantasy
Henry Allen
That’s how bad AngloSlav conservative monarchist sucked at management. Still the case to the day.
Gabriel Collins
That's the actual history of it. Like from a history book. The things people on Any Forums are incapable of reading
Nathaniel Sanchez
Someone been spying on Putin
David Davis
>That's the actual history of it. Like from a history book. The things people on Any Forums are incapable of reading
And to be fair the only thing I can say is that a lot of US and western history books gloss over the reasons and motives for the holodomor. Some do, some don't. Depends on which one you consult. Some do just say "soviets killed kulaks cuz soviets bad n hated kulaks". They wouldn't deny anything I say, they just gleefully and conveniently omit certain details of the kulak's actions. I mean if you can't recognize that's your US state department and capitalist propaganda at work then that's on you
Grayson Ross
Post your source then
John King
so did murrica tho..but they love it
Austin Walker
No I'm not "posting your source" you people on here aren't worth that. You're nobodies and you need to learn your own basic history
Daniel Thompson
Lenin’s Jewish nepotism inclinations would have won if Bronstein wasn’t such a conceited douche. It took ww2 for Jews to call a truce to their crab syndrome and fertilized the ground so the ashkenazi could flourish.
Camden Robinson
most of already hate communists user, theres no need to false flag like this
Sebastian Rogers
Not "posting sources" you people don't even believe in the holocaust. You're not interested in "sources" you'll just call them jewish.
There's not a historian alive that would disagree with or dispute anything I said
The only trick that's used to mislead people on this issue is just conveniently leaving out descriptions of the kulaks beliefs and motives in US western textbooks and wikipedia
Exact same dynamic as what's happening today in Ukraine with the US state department and MSM refusing to acknowledge that they are nazis, by the way
Austin Peterson
i find it much more likely that you have never actually read a history book