White replacement theory

we got one going right here, fren. no need to leave!

Attached: 1589559661519.jpg (995x889, 271.63K)

Well, duh, governments have been bragging for decades that they are doing it. How stupid do you have to be to have been immersed in "Diversity is beautiful!", "That city,town,state,music genre,form of athletics is too white!", "Overrepresentation of 'minorities' is okay, its just too many whites that's a problem" to get that replacement and white genocide are long standing government policies?

this u

Attached: 1654866385058.jpg (575x620, 49.75K)

*White Replacement Policy

Reality. Come home to New England before it's too late

>irrelevant, time wasting question
>white replacement
another memeflag drops the ball

Attached: 1649465780005.jpg (939x1024, 124.85K)

post your anti-white agenda video, big J

Attached: 1592788152425.png (594x396, 225.79K)

“In opening the general discussion, an Australian speaker said that the flow of migration depended in part on the absorptive capacity of the receiving country, which in turn depended on the rate of expansion of its economy in relation to its technical efficiency and its standard of living. It also depended on the available sources of migration, which were related to population pressure and the existence of international differences in standards of living. He believed that there was a large absorptive capacity for additional population in the Commonwealth, though it varied widely between different countries. But the standards of living in Great Britain and the Dominions were now fairly equal, so the conditions for a flow of people on economic grounds now or in the future were absent.

Another Australian delegate pointed out that the net reproduction rates in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand were below unity. A United Kingdom delegate added that England, during the past eight years, had been, on balance, a substantial immigrant-receiving country, and there was little likelihood of substantial emigration from England in the future. An Irish member observed that Ireland was the only remaining source of white emigration in the Commonwealth and said the white races were killing themselves off by not having sufficient children.” – Page 177, British Commonwealth and the Future: Proceedings of the Second Unofficial Conference on British Commonwealth Relations, Sydney 3rd-17th September, 1938by Commonwealth Relations Conference (2nd : 1938 : Sydney, Australia); Hodson, H. V. (Henry Vincent)

Issuded under the joint auspices of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Indian Institute of International Affairs

Attached: britishcommonwealthandthefuture.png (694x572, 557.78K)

This. If you use "white genocide" people will either ignore what you have to say or will debate you about what defines the term "genocide" rather than focusing on the issue of whites becoming a minority throughout the west.

“The concluding discussion bore mainly on two topics: the White Australia policy and the problem of miscegenation.
White Australia. An Australian delegate urged the recognition of the principle of racial equality and, as a contribution towards solving a vexed problem, the admission of a limited number of Indians to Australia under a quota system. But he acknowledged the strength of opinion (and prejudice) in his country on the matter. Another Australian said that it was imperative that the whole problem should be raised simply and clearly by the people concerned. If the Indians were prepared to respect Australian standards of life, and if the issue of race equality could be solved for them by admission of a number of Indians from time to time, then something might be done. But the only body which could raise the matter successfully would be the industrial labour movement. Australian discussion of the matter had been so much bound up with the idea of exploitation that ‘if it were raised by anyone else at all, the suggestion of exploitation would be raised. This is a problem for the Australian Labour movement, and if agreement could be reached between the Indian trade-union movement and the Australian trade-union movement on this issue, it could be solved in a comparatively short time’.” – Page 215-216, British Commonwealth and the Future: Proceedings of the Second Unofficial Conference on British Commonwealth Relations, Sydney 3rd-17th September, 1938by Commonwealth Relations Conference (2nd : 1938 : Sydney, Australia); Hodson, H. V. (Henry Vincent)

Issuded under the joint auspices of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Indian Institute of International Affairs

archive.org/details/britishcommonwea00comm

Attached: australianinstituteofinternationalaffairs.jpg (193x200, 4.05K)

“Miscegenation. A United Kingdom delegate urged the importance of scientific study on the question of race intermixture as a vital matter in migration policy. In dealing with this matter, a nation might either attempt to prevent any intermixture at all; or allow ‘pockets’ which might well lead to the kind of political and social difficulties that were discussed in Commissions I and II; or it could adopt a policy of gradual assimilation of new elements. If the last alternative were adopted, this made imperative the scientific study of what races would, in fact, blend satisfactorily with its existing population. Such an inquiry should free itself from the suggestion that there was anything derogatory to any race in asking, in a scientific spirit, whether the mixture between that race and another was biologically satisfactory. In particular, it was necessary to separate biological and social problems, and to face the problem of whether feeling against half-castes had a biological basis, or whether (for example) it arose particularly in cases of union between partners at totally different cultural levels, as defence against deterioration by those at the higher level. Was it true, the speaker asked, that intermixture had proceeded so far in certain places (e.g. Java) that there were no social or other distinctions based on race ? And had this process produced a type inferior to the pure Dutch? In present world conditions this problem was becoming of urgent and increasing importance, partly owing to the development of backward races, the falling birth-rate among the white races, and improved means of world communication.” – Page 216-217

archive.org/details/britishcommonwea00comm

Attached: royalinstituteofinternationalaffairs.jpg (613x397, 163.85K)

“Subsequent speakers referred to research on race fusion which had been carried out in the Pacific Islands and Honolulu, but it was said that biological evidence was inconclusive. A South African delegate doubted whether it would ever be possible, on purely biological grounds, to give a clear judgement on the general question of race-mixture. He said that the difficulty was sociological rather than biological. It arose ‘very largely from the social stigma and social disabilities to which halfbreeds are everywhere subject. I feel that wherever that feeling prevails, however satisfactory may be the relationship between man and woman, it is a crime against the children’. The same speaker added that, according to his observation, white objection to miscegenation (at least in South Africa) was a phenomenon incidental to the maintenance of group-identity, as was shown by the fact that the objection persisted even when the mixed-breed offspring was granted to be equal, and even superior, in quality to the parents of different racial stocks." - Page 217

Attached: southafricaninstituteofinternationalaffairs.jpg (1024x520, 49.86K)

"The discussion was closed by an Indian delegate, who again directed the Commission’s attention to discrimination against his countrymen in various parts of the Commonwealth. In spite of the resolution passed at the Imperial Conference of 1918, Indian students, tourists, and business men visiting South Africa, Canada, and New Zealand were liable to be subjected to a harassing examination. In South Africa, Japanese were admitted on consular recommendation: Canada admitted a yearly maximum of 150 for permanent settlement. But in neither case was a similar privilege granted to Indians. Finally, he pointed out that many of the Commonwealth’s racial problems were originally caused by migration of Europeans (for instance to South Africa), not of non European people. ‘Surely, in these circumstances, it is too late in the day to raise these questions only when Indians ask for their rights as citizens of a common Empire.’ “ - Page 217, British Commonwealth and the Future: Proceedings of the Second Unofficial Conference on British Commonwealth Relations, Sydney 3rd-17th September, 1938by Commonwealth Relations Conference (2nd : 1938 : Sydney, Australia); Hodson, H. V. (Henry Vincent)

Issuded under the joint auspices of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Indian Institute of International Affairs

archive.org/details/britishcommonwea00comm

Attached: IndianCouncilofWorldAffairs.jpg (345x345, 41.54K)

“The author of another preparatory paper suggested ‘an estimated possible figure for immigration into Canada of around 50,000 yearly’, and he wrote: The upper limit of any probable population in Canada at the end of this century has been placed by those who have made a really careful study ofthe problem at 20 million people. A Study Group in Victoria, B.C., after emphasizing the importance of relative standards of living to this question, reached the conclusion ‘that, were there no restrictions, British Columbia could and would support a very con¬ siderably increased population of Asiatic origin’. Another commentator suggested that more emphasis should be laid upon the need for a greater measure of social security in Canada.” – Page 49

“Above all, the rise of non-white nations to self-government, allied to the natural course of world events, will drive racial and inter-continental questions more and more to the front of Commonwealth problems. New attitudes of mind will become necessary —a discarding, no doubt, of the tacit assumption, of which an Indian delegate complained, that the British nations have a divine purpose to fulfil and have more to contribute than other nations to the fund of practical wisdom about race relations; a discarding, too—in the phrase of a United Kingdom delegate—of condescension, and of the attitude of mind on both sides that always suspects something sinister in the other.” – Page 277

archive.org/details/britishcommonwea00comm

Attached: newzealandinstituteofinternationalaffairs.png (322x156, 6.31K)

This book that I've linked was written to detail the minutes regarding a conference held in 1938 that was conducted by some of the most powerful individuals within the British Commonwealth system. These included members of the Round Table Group network including the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs and the Indian Institute of International Affairs. This was an extremely important meeting in regards to foreign affairs and the future direction and plans of the world. They discussed everything from the coming world war, the creation of a world government system superseding the idea of national sovereignty (which became the United Nations), China becoming a major economic power in the world, multilateral security cooperation alliances (they mentioned Canada joining a world war if Japan attacked the United States for instance), the prominence of the International Court at the Hague and so on.

However, since this thread specifically about the concept of mass migration and deliberately planned demographic replacement, all of the above quotes that I posted deal specifically with that issue. They discussed replacing the white population in British Columbia with a population of Asiatic origin. We've definitely a lot of this come to pass in the 84 years since this book was originally written. It also discussed how they were going to deal with the declining white birth rates in virtually every country in the entire British Commonwealth and really Europe as a whole. They deliberately discussed using miscegenation as a deliberate geopolitical policy solution to solve the declining birthrates within white nations.

Attached: canadianinternationalcouncil.png (564x301, 6.23K)

While they mentioned it was possibly to prevent any intermixture at all, it was very clear that they were giving much more credence and favor towards bringing in immigrations from non-white Commonwealth countries to intermix and replace the domestic white populations. They discussed that the biggest problem of this was sociological, not biological. They said the main obstacle to this was white group-identity to opposed intermixing even when the offspring was of superior quality to two white parents (that's at least what one of them said).

Anyway, I'm not going to go into the entire history of the Round Table Movement and the Round Table Groups. Suffice to say, these groups exist in every country today and they operate as shadow governments that dictate domestic and geo-political policies behind the scene. They frequently conduct conferences and meetings, many of which are held in confidence and secret away from the general public. These people are globalists and internationals that are dedicated towards the cause of creating a one world government. They eventually want to end national sovereignty and nation states entirely.

A lot of people who discuss the plans for "white genocide" if you want to call it that and demographic replacement will refer to Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi. He obviously was the founding president of the Paneuropean Union and he wrote pretty revealing passage in his book "Practical Idealism" about mixing the races of the world into one common hybrid race. Pretty much everyone on this board already knows this, and it's an important piece of historical evidence from a high level geopolitical figure that gives tremendous weight to support these demographic replacement beliefs.

Attached: israelcouncilonforeignrelations.jpg (220x190, 14.66K)

However, the quotations that I just posted from the "British Commonwealth and the Future: Proceedings of the Second Unofficial Conference on British Commonwealth Relations" book are even more important in my opinion. There are many quotations referencing this plan, and they are quite explicit about what their goals are. I'll post a good video below that is a very good summary for a lot, but not al, of important subjects that are covered within it.

Also, it's worth mentioning that while this book didn't reference what any of the delegates specifically said by name during this conference because it was held under the secrecy of "Chatham House Rule", there is a list at the back of the book of the people who attended this meeting. If you take a look at the list, you will get perspective on just how many high level power brokers actually attended the conference and helped formulate policy for the entire British Commonwealth network.

Alan Watt - Great Britain, Embryo of World Government
youtube.com/watch?v=0_sVdiO-31Q

archive.org/details/britishcommonwea00comm

Attached: europeancouncilonforeignrelations.png (319x158, 6.88K)

excellent posts, thank you

Attached: 1598976734981.jpg (500x725, 156.1K)

No, its just a right-wing conspiracy theory...
oh, except for when they admit it:
c-span.org/video/?c4926142/user-clip-joe-biden-unrelenting-stream-immigration

Attached: 1652307073699.jpg (494x705, 284.76K)

Good job guys. Good links there fren.

This was mentioned briefly on a recent TDS(?) show and they don't think using the term 'white genocide' is a problem. I'd somewhat disagree because of this reason you said: badly motivated lefty wankers will always distract.
However, ultimately, it is a developing genocide under the UN definitions, as without borders whites will go the way of the Neanderthal (referred to correctly as an 'extinct hominid').

I doesn't matter if you think it's true, it's terrible rhetoric. The average person thinks of mass graves/gas chambers when they hear the word "genocide". They will you think you're crazy for suggesting that's whats occurring to white people.

>white genocide
i don't think it's a particularly useful term, either
after making a handful of those coombait images with "white genocide," i changed the text to "replacement" for those reasons. makes more sense and is more palatable to the normie. and the normie is the target of those images.

Attached: 1629821807060.jpg (1223x1763, 731.46K)

I agree. Ethnic cleansing is a better term.

Thanks, user. Glad to contribute. The sad thing is that a lot of people feel that we have to speculate or use demographical trends as our only form of argument in these discussions. But if you are really willing to dig, you can find real evidence of long term geopolitical plans for demographic replacement policies in the historical literature. I know these kind of dry facts aren't going to convince many people because nobody is going to open up a dusty old book that was written in the 1930s, yet along have the historical context to understand why it's so important. But the point is that we do have actual evidence to prove that these policies are the result of deliberate and calculated planning to manifest these results into reality. It's not like politicians just didn't understand or consider the unintended effects of these policies and it all these changes occurred organically. They not only knew what was going to happen, but they did this deliberately to bring it about.

Attached: InstituteofStrategicandInternationalStudiesMalaysia.png (586x168, 21.97K)