How do you explain why White Replacement is bad without sounding like a neo nazi racist?
The leftist cannot argue anymore that White Replacement Theory isn't real, so now they just started asking "If WRT is real, why is it an issue that you're being replace by non-whites? Are you racist?".
I have no idea how to come back at this without telling them the truth about niggers and kikes and reveal my power level.
Because I'm white and replacing whites means replacing me and people I care about.
Try approaching it from the perspective of another race. No one would ever celebrate the systemic replacement of Japanese in their own country. Imagine a small minority of people actively importing millions of whites to Japan. Would the Japanese have the right to be angry over this? Of course they would. So why not whites?
Because minorities constantly vote left
Leftism is faggotry regardless of race
Because nonwhites are racist against me
>No one would ever celebrate the systemic replacement of Japanese in their own country.
They've already lifted their mask on this
its as simple as this
The interesting thing is that no whites actually want to come to the US. Whats also even more interesting is that whites had no problem opening the flood gates for Europoors back in the 1800's and early 1900's which kept wages down and increased competition exponentially which drove prices up across the board.
Shit has always been the same. They brought in cheap Chinese labor to build the railroads.
But that's the point exactly... Tolerance is turned against you. This is one lesson that everyone should learn... You can't possibly win this one. If you're ok with being replaced, then you WILL be replaced... What's good about your existence anyways?
You could just argue that literally everywhere in history, "replacement" is codeword for genocide. Point out whites are now minorities, which is objective, and ask them to swap the word "white in the statement with the term for another minority. If the result is still acceptable, then it is ethically warranted. But it will not be acceptable, of course.
If they argue "muh whites are rich" so they don't count as minority, just mention the German-speakers in Italy's Bozen province. They are a wealthy minority, but nobody dares talking of replacing them because it would be racist and genocidal. The constitution protects them. So why not other whites too?
Yes and the southerners demeaned manual labor to the point no white wanted to work on farms otherwise be labeled a redneck - which was the white equivalent of calling a black man a nigger. If you were a white laborer you were basically an untouchable. This was done to justify the mass importation of negro slaves which overwhelmingly enriched a small handful of plantation owners.
>without sounding like a neo nazi racist?
You can't. Anything that is even secondarily associated with whiteness is declared to be literal Nazism these days, for example:
>gun rights
>right to self-defence
>law and order
>working to schedules and with purpose
>objectivity
And even some things not even a tiny bit associated with white people, eg:
>Black people punching old Asians in the back of the head
>Asians doing well in education
>Men disputing child custody with their wives.
Might as well just be some kind of updated Nazi. The Optics Debate has been over for a while now.
It is always the same. He who owns the robots will be the ruler of the new world.
Wrong.
And death to NATO and all glownigger traitors.
Stop caring about whether you sound like a "racist".
That word exists only to demonize perfectly valid grievances of differing groups of man and their inherent incompatibilities. The term was also popularized by Trotsky, a red kike.
The only people who care about that label aren't worth considering in the first place.
Stop heeding the concerns of such people.
Op, simply answer the following question:
Do white people, or more accurately people of European descent, have the right to self determination?
You dont need to kill a single person to commit genocide.
i guess then the question is if white replacement is happening but isnt racist, why? i would assume they justify it openly at that point.
Low wages
High rent
Overpopulated cities bad for environment
And how sny of those points apply to whites Who dont want sex or want to rise dogs as childs lmao
Ask them "do they think the replacement of native American Indians was a bad thing?"
They just admitted population replacement is bad conceptually.
Then ask them your original question.
They will say it's not the same, but logically it is and they know it.
See how long this argument will stay up in a leftist echo chamber before it gets memory holed.