>be me
>white male in washington state
>have CCW
>carry my grandads 44 mag with me everywhere
>go to mcDonalds
>see black guy
>tell nigger to fuck off to the nearest popeyes and stay out of my state
>naturally, he gets aggressive
>physically assaults me
>i blow his head off in self defense
How would this hold up in court
Other urls found in this thread:
i thinks that would be murder one.
You're fucked.
If you have to ask, you've never even touched a gun lying lefty.
"nigger" has been classified as "fighting words," which in certain circumstances would invalidate your self defense claim
Hilariously one of those circumstances is having a gun on you at all, so you would be absolutely fucked in this situation
Not because you shot a nigger, but because you called him a nigger before you shot him
You lug a 44 mag around? Your either a liar or a complete retard.
I stopped reading when I saw the White pants
it's an L frame s&w. not much bigger than a full size 9mm.
And OP gets charged with a hate crime
>it's an L frame s&w. not much bigger than a full size 9mm.
in New York we’d already scoped you out and put you in brain jail.
provide proof of law
The same as that guy that baited a couple of nigs down an alleyway to blast em.
You literally have to get hit when you dindu nuffin before you can draw down. If you're even the slightest bit out of place wherever you are then its a hate crime.
Bate and switch.
Oh you thought this was going to be a fair fight?
BANG!
Wouldn't hold up in any state in this country.
you wont do shit, mutt
stop larping and get off Any Forums faggot
Since you typed it here , that’s 1st degree murder since you plotted it out
Technically it's precedent, not law
Which is a jewish way of saying it's the judge's discretion in interpreting the law
Look up the supreme court decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
i can tell you're not very well informed.
sounds like a foolproof plan
search says that the conviction was overturned?
It's since been limited, but is largely still in effect
The current interpretation is any speech “that insult, or provoke violence, 'on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender”
Again, there is "no law" because what we're talking about is precedent
The law in question is the first amendment
USA courts are based on feelings and not on facts. So your scenario would work if you managed to make negro to attack you without anyone knowing you offended him and then CCTV camera has to catch it and you have to also take punch then shoot.
it wouldn't
also ffs buy a better ccw
Probably not well man. Self defence gets a little grey when you deliberately antagonize someone.
I'm mean, it's like 50/50 justified self defence or murder one. Depends on the judge you get.
Kyle Rittenhouse had the most clear cut case of self defence I have ever seen.....the fact he even had to go to court when there is a video of the whole thing goes to show you that western law is no longer about real justice and individual rights......