Eat the rich

give me 5 reasons why shouldn't the 99% remove the 1%?

Attached: Michael-Fleshman-Occupy-Wall-Street-March-16-2012-flickr.jpg (2288x1220, 1.74M)

Because the 1% convinced the 95% to defend the 1% against the 4% that would actually do it.

let's say the 95% can be manipulated the same way as the msm did. A bit a food scarcity can change things fast

4 more to go

>literally isn’t in the 1%
Ngmi

you have no attention span

1% are half Jewish, so you won’t ever do shit

they tried that
occupy scared the 1%, elites, whatever you want to call them, so badly the glowies were deployed to bust it up with the privilege stack and now things are the way they are

Also this (b/c elites are half Jewish or more)

its the wrong heuristic for who to remove. while the people who need to be removed tend to be rich, not all of the rich are people who need to be removed. easier heuristic is to just get rid of the jews and democrats.

Because those 1% are obviously smarter than the 99%. They just swooped in and put some money here and there and the whole occupy movement fell apart and now it's all about retard identity politics instead, which is harmless to the richfags. Working class btfo I guess.

Attached: 1599165507916.png (853x704, 34.16K)

Revolutions don't remove the elite from power. They just come back because their genes persistently mean they will out perform their peers. Genes out last revolutions.

These same people, including Any Forums, shilled and pushed for a country wide stimulus and massive economic bailout and QE spending in these last 2-3 years. No one's going to remove anything.

You absolute mathematically illiterate retard. After the 1% is "gone", there is another "1%" in that 99%. And even if the new 1% isnt as rich, it will become so soon.
>to he who has, more will be given and from him who has not, everything will be taken even that which he has.
Its just the nature of reality that even our goat herder ancestors understood. Its not the result of some conspiracy.

>give me 5 reasons why shouldn't the 99% remove the 1%?
Stockholm syndrome

Bump for the cause.
Heil Hitler, comrades. Only when national socialists and marxist socialist unite, will the greedy few be in camps.

the next 1% will not own 99% of all disposable wealth and if they try they can be eaten too

I don't buy this, the rich is not genetically superior. Passing down wealth is superior, that is why we have generations of rich people

it can be both

Natsoc is on board with your plan as long as there are no exceptions.

>why shouldn't the 99% remove the 1%?
Because that's antisemitic, oy vey!

Also
>Catalonia memeflag
Herb'd.

Attached: 1654942307377.jpg (1366x934, 333.94K)

There are many jews in the 1% considering there so many wealthy jews in the media, business, and finance. Removing the 1% would be an act of anti-Semitism

ANAL SEX, thats all the reason we need

Attached: occupy.jpg (750x948, 133.97K)

Because your overlords won’t let you get close to them.

It was our destiny to bring in a 21st century utopia as millennials. We were so close. Then they killed us, stole our futures, and ruined the future.

>give me 5 reasons why shouldn't the 99% remove the 1%?
You literally can't remove the 1%, someone from the 99% will always fill the void.

Stupid commie faggots.

The 99% is literally just niggers and spics, m8