How come no country has implemented passive income yet...

People who promote it think we already live in the year 2350 already and everything is automated. But that's not the case.

But that's the problem with leftist ideologies in general. They believe they live in some utopian future, which ignoring the reality of today.

Boomers and their mindset have to die off first before this can become reality

*while ignoring

>tf
>tp
Don't you have neet money? That's as close to free shit as you'd get

I know it all too well. And you're certainly talking like a lazy commie dreaming about his utopia in which nobody has to work unless they want to. The means by which you propose doing this is essentially the same as seizing the means of production and redistributing the wealth. Pure commie talk. None of that wealth belongs to you unless you're a shareholder or is owed compensation as part of your employment terms.

The money provided by passive income will be spent on stuff, stimulating the market. Stimulus packages are used all the time in macroeconomics.
There's no inherent value in working hard if your work is meaningless. Working hard to grow crops or invent shit is admirable and important, but investing time and effort into meaningless jobs is just Sisyfosian.

Most office workers do their daily tasks in 1-2 hours and just dick around the rest of the time. It's working only for the sake of working. That time should be spent furthering mathemathics or writing plays.

Attached: FGOO7RBWYAMU6ol.png (512x468, 125.36K)

>How come no country has implemented passive income yet?
because of chiner, unironically

I would rather a complete reset on wealth than have everyone automatically given money for existing, how fucking dysgenic is the population going to be when the most disgusting creatures on Earth aren't met by any evolutionary pressures?

>notesfrompoland.com/2022/05/19/researchers-prepare-polands-first-experiment-in-universal-basic-income/
>31,000
accelerate into collapse

In the early 2000s you could get NEET money if you just felt like it. Today it's a lot more stict, you need to have a doctor's assessment that you are fully unable to work. Even then it's a lot of administrative hassle to go through.

Most jobs have a ton of filler shit if they aren't entirely useless in the first place. I used to assemble components for a living, a fairly physical job, and I still got the whole week's work done in one day and a half. All the boomers in my team had learned to do it leisurely and take a lot of breaks so they had something to do for the whole 40 hours and then they liked to work overtime for extra pay. Why do people want to live like that?

It goes against..."global interests".

Attached: 2299953.jpg (998x1200, 129.86K)

It'd be cool if we could, but we really aren't there yet. The money will still have to come from somewhere, and who are you gonna tax when no one works?
I think for now a better solution would be to try to eliminate the useless parts of jobs and just send everyone home early once the actual work is done instead of having them just sit around and do meaningless tasks. Having to do just part time work already eliminates many of the downsides of the 40 hours workweek, while still being feasible and still giving people a sense of purpose that they won't get from just hedonisticly sitting at home all day

That's not at all what I'm saying. You're putting words in my mouth and getting angry about what you pretend that I'm saying. Please refrain from replying any further if you lack reading comprehension.
You can't stop evolution. Sexual selection would still be a driving force.

>300 euros
If you don't rent it's fine... probably... maybe? Dunno, that sum would work here.
>hassle
Don't think UBI will be "yes i want free shit thanks bye" either, unless it's global, country-wide in this case.
>pretending to work
Ah yes, the neverending classic. Because if you don't there'll be "something" you can do so you're not "slacking".

>You can't stop evolution. Sexual selection would still be a driving force.
sexual selection is not an evolutionary force

My point exactly. No wonder that people are feeling increasingly depressed in a system like this.
Of course not *all* work is useless, but a large part of it is.
One practical solution could be that instead of the normalized 8 hour work day, you could recieve the same salary as long as you just finish your tasks, which might just take a couple of hours.

Attached: _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f-1.jpg (976x850, 57.91K)

cool so how are you competing against adversarial states?

Females choosing a partner with favourable genetics over unwanted genetics is a evolutionary driving force in practically all animals. What are you talking about?

I know but there is this notion that if we were to share resources to people so most can have liveable lives without breaking down their bodies and mental states for their whole life like its their goal in life it would somehow crash the economy and economy is apparently more important than the happiness of the people.
I think the biggest issue would probably be that 90% would just amount to nothing and be social and happy with their friends. Which honestly sounds like a nice society i would wanna live in.
>Most office workers do their daily tasks in 1-2 hours and just dick around the rest of the time.
Most days i dont even do that. Like I have to struggle finding stuff to do so I can tell them at daily meetings what I did.

In what sense?

That is exactly what you're saying, only you don't seem to realize it because you've been fooled into believing that there is some difference because muh automation. It doesn't matter how wealth is produced by these companies. The wealth does not belong to you unless you're a shareholder. If you believe that it does, then you're a communist.

By the way, people who do own shares in large companies producing a lot of wealth, do get to live a lifestyle of passive income. Why? Because they fucking own it. You do not.

an individual woman selects for traits that are useful for survival, sure
that doesn't mean the groups of people who have the most children offer the highest chance of survival to the tribe, and are most beneficial to the society.
well, what do people mostly do for leisure nowadays? it's mostly mindless dopaminergic entertainment, if an adversarial state have a population that aren't masturbating to themselves you and all of your loved ones are vulnerable and defenceless.

>From what I understand it's been successful where it has been tested.
It wasn't. You fell for the Chinese "anti-work" psyop with which China tries to weaken Western economy even further.

If evolution is true why monkeys still exist?

it’s called being a shareholder but the catch is you already have to be rich

sry only mr shekelberg should live off goy interest
the cattle must be occupied with meaningless tasks to keep them subservient
an idle mind is dangerous

You're completely missing the point. If a large number of people are working 8 hour work days, but actually working for only 1 hour, then this is a systematic problem that needs to be adressed. It's not communism to point out that instead of pretending to work, this time should be used for leisure and recreational activities.

Moreover, the money of corporations do go to the state in many ways, by way of taxes and to salary of its workers to name two. Conversely, a lot of governments provide huge amounts of money to corporations in forms of stimulus, buyouts, bail outs and investments. This clear-cut thinking of private money vs governmemt money is naive and uninformed.
Evolution is a law of nature that dictates how life forms take shape. It's not something that can be stopped, hindered, helped or advanced. In the same way that human action is "bad for gravity" or "bad for osmosis", evolution is not something that is affected by any human activity in any capacity.

>mountain jew fears the thinking man

>You're completely missing the point.
No, I'm just reading what you're saying and telling you what it actually means when you cut the chaff. Because you've been fooled.

We pretty much already live in a society where smart people do a little bit of fun work here and there, it's only the slaves grinding away for 40 hours in menial jobs.

Attached: 1638032369106.jpg (770x600, 63.33K)

>If a large number of people are working 8 hour work days, but actually working for only 1 hour, then this is a systematic problem that needs to be adressed. It's not communism to point out that instead of pretending to work, this time should be used for leisure and recreational activities.
>Moreover, the money of corporations do go to the state in many ways, by way of taxes and to salary of its workers to name two. Conversely, a lot of governments provide huge amounts of money to corporations in forms of stimulus, buyouts, bail outs and investments. This clear-cut thinking of private money vs governmemt money is naive and uninformed.
Funny how you conveniently ignored this part

How do i do that?
I dont want to be a slave but i dont want to be a neet either and i dont want to lose my soul

>Evolution is a law of nature that dictates how life forms take shape. It's not something that can be stopped, hindered, helped or advanced. In the same way that human action is "bad for gravity" or "bad for osmosis", evolution is not something that is affected by any human activity in any capacity.
you didn't address my post at all, evolution happens because traits are selected for which are advantageous to our survival. kill yourself you communist swine.

Yes, and that continues no matter the action of any human or any society. Again, evolution is not something that can be hindered or stopped, as with any law of nature. We will keep getting selected for survival no matter what, as with any living organism. You seem to have misunderstood the concept of evolution.

kill yourself communist swine

>But if I call you a commie, nazi or conspiracy theorist i dont actually have to engage in a conversation to disprove what you are saying..

the redpill is that modern society only need a fews millions worker to make the mahines works, most people are doing jack shit or over complicating task to occupy them (bullshit jobs)

Not knowing how evolution works has nothing to do with communism bro

reply to the rest of my post

Less people would work shitty dead end wageslave jobs and this would upset the ruling class.

Checkmate, globeheads.

>an individual woman selects for traits that are useful for survival, sure
All induvidual women, not "an"
>that doesn't mean the groups of people who have the most children offer the highest chance of survival to the tribe, and are most beneficial to the society.
Yes and no. If the groups of people who have the most children are most apt for survival, they will find success. If they aren't, then they won't. It's really this simple. Evolution is self-regulating by definition. The most fit to survive, survive. Period.

>shitskins fears work

What's a right wing parasite such as yourself doing outside of Any Forums? I think you're lost buddy, the bootstraps club is two doors down.

I have many issues with society but I'm not a UBI club nor a boostraps club attendee.

>efficency and automation
then why am i working 50-60h weeks with the option to work basicly unlimited hours if i wanted and the entire working sector is screaming for more guys?
anyone who say things like you have never worked a day in their life
>automated car mechanics, plumbers, welders, electricans, carpenters
lol

Talking about white collar office work bruv

No, fuck off. Socialism will have its place again. You capitalist fucks sank the global fucking economy unimpeded after only 30 years while the stimmied socialist system made backwards agrarian shitholes into superpowers and has helped Cuba stave off the US for sixty fucking years.