Why does Any Forums worship the 3rd reich so much?

Why is it that Germans and Fins are so fucking based on this site? Could actually be that intelligence is genetic. (English, Americans, Canadians and Greeks are the worst)

They think that in a NatSoc society their overlord is going to be benevolent. Even though the vanguard mentality of a one-party/one-man having absolute power is fundamentally wrong. They lambast the Jews for doing exactly that.

Globalism, consumerism, individualism, and capitalism were part of America since the beginning. Your country was a shopping mall for immigrants from the very beginning. American self-interested mentality is much more Jewish than actual communists. It's in your ideology, the way you think, and the way you perceive the world and yourself.

European intellectuals always supported the idea of societies that do not put monetary value as their primary goal. That people are not alienated from each other, nature, and their living environment. 'And how we are not solely focused on the unlimited expansion of productive forces and generally, the unlimited expansion of a rationalized domination over nature and over humans themselves. This is not just a leftist take. Heidegger said the same thing in his critique on technology, a great criticism of capitalism.

I like the idea of a socialist society where people are able to grow in a proper environment, where cities for example are designed for humans. 'And the whole society is centered around cultivating proper people. The reason we do that is so we can focus on important things that matter like science and art. Give our people the ability to produce and create.

This feels like a post from r/explainlikeim5

>(English, Americans, Canadians and Greeks are the worst)
meant to write australians instead of canadians

>1pbtid

>Even though the vanguard mentality of a one-party/one-man having absolute power is fundamentally wrong.
This is inevitable and the natural state of humans
People want to follow leaders, most are built to follow
You give them freedom and the first thing they do is give it away

>Even though the vanguard mentality of a one-party/one-man having absolute power is fundamentally wrong. They lambast the Jews for doing exactly that.
No, the Jews believe in the power of a blood elite, regardless of individual achievement or merit, all that matters is obeying the Jewish blood rituals and persuing the agenda.
>They think that in a NatSoc society their overlord is going to be benevolent.
>Implying Hitler wasn't benevolent
It's not like he decreased unemployment by 40% after entering office, made Germany independent economically and militarily, stopped the self-destructive guilt taught to the German people by the Jews and then had said Jews evicted from all positions of authority or anything like that.

Attached: 1652813582648.jpg (500x515, 51.09K)

>Implying China isn't expansionist
lol. lmao

Because a nigger would be hanged for raping and stealing

It’s only tyranny if you disagree with the dictatorship

>white society
>it's basically totalitarian bug society
lol you're retarded.

I don't even care about the nazis, but they did not have a society like the chinese. That's retarded nonsense. You're a friggen idiot and you should kill yourself.

Also they knew Rothschild bribed US officials to US enter in The first wolrd war and thus ending German chance of Victory

Germany Reich was a response against globohomo that had many Jews in key positions

Race is the only thing that matters

>People want to follow leaders, most are built to follow
If this is true for 'your people' then you deserve your fate. You will be surpassed by those who managed to develop as humans. 'And what I mean by that is: take the example of Turkey where they expect a Kemal-like figure to propel them forward, and they get an Erdogan. While North European countries have escaped the authoritarian paradigm and have created what Hegel called 'reichstatt,' the rule of law. Our modern-day republics are much more efficient and productive than authoritarian structures exactly because they do not require a single individual to work. We've created systems that work for us by themselves. They don't require an individual (especially when you take into account that most of the time, they won't be benevolent). Now, if you take a third-world country like Lebanon for example and their people say 'that this style of governance won't work here because people are corrupt etcetc' then they deserve what they have now.

If people elevate themselves from authoritarianism and do not require someone to follow they will be better off. Those who cannot take that step forward should stay where they are, and create a society that mirrors their psyche. A society where you have the Sultan above you dictating how things should be done. This is fundamentally wrong because you accept your position as a slave, you act as a slave and do not engage in society apart from doing your part as a disposable tool. 'And this they call collectivism. In that society there is no dialectic, there is no development. 'And when their benevolent dictator dies, because it's not the people that constitute society. In an authoritarian regime, the people themselves don't come to the conclusions that they are being imposed upon them. This is why there can be no real progress. This is why authoritarianism is fundamentally wrong. Example: is Muslim countries when their leaders died, they had nothing to show for it.

“Freedon is good, but to choose between moral options” Julius Evola.

>the absolute cucked selfhating state of krauts.
what the kikes did to this once proud race they will do to everyone.