why not opt for the safest, most abundant, cleanest, and cheapest form of energy that we have: coal? Coal is the best, far safer and cleaner than nuclear.
Nuclear energy is discussed here often as an alternative to the "Green New Deal, but
Other urls found in this thread:
If you aren't a retarded commie then you can make a nuclear plant
japanese are doing tidal power now with big rollers
some of those islands off scotland have been using it for decades now, the coal was fucking with the whiskey water
>the coal was fucking with the whiskey water
Sounds like the Scots didn't know how to do proper runoff control. Why bother with all this bullshit green energy like tidal power when coal is the cheapest and most abundant.
Yet you don't address my point, nuclear fag. Coal is the cheapest and cleanest, more so than nuclear.
coal smoke comes down with the rain, the slag has to be disposed of, scrubbers do ok but there are huge problems with coal unless you have a nice safe place to dump everything and also store the coal before you burn it
Small problems. Coal smoke can be made extremely clean like with technology they have in China. Also, just berm off the areas where coal is stored.
I work in water treatment. Coal "ash" ponds have to be cleaned for literal years before they are even safe enough to put back into waterways. Coal is filled with toxic shit
The newer coal plants in the US are just as clean.
Killing off coal has nothing to do with cleanliness, it's all about the elites trying to drag us serfs back to the stone age by taking us off of cheap, abundant, efficient fuels.
They want you scared, divided, powerless, and thinking that everything is your fault.
>far safer and cleaner than nuclear
"No." Coal emits shitton of pollutants, NPPs emit water vapour and some Xenon. You can also pack far more energy into far smaller space with nuclear.
They already have all the power they need for free now. No need for coal. Tide power installations can be made cleaner than coal, out of simple materials, no waste needed, and already work.
I'm in favor of whatever would cause more butthurt among the ESG faggots.
Nuclear is cleaner and safer than coal
coal isn't safer or cleaner than nuclear.
but it is cheaper
and its clean and safe enough to where it is implemented and utilized.
what's your point?
power generation of the grid comes from many different sources not a singular mono source.
nuclear plants run essentially for free with fuel so abundant it hardly has to be mined. and their cost per dollar in actuality to run much cheaper than their projections since plants run decades past their lifetime.
regardless of these facts power generation isn't a monalyth. and they all have their advantages/disadvantages.
energy can be incredibly cheap but it is not; because the forces of finance sees to it that it will not.
Energy like other sectors isn't seen as a service of altruism to provide to people; an area like all others that is in the grasp of the finance jew. this jew overthrows any place that provides energy and power altruistically without their finance jewry. they destroys them completely, such example being Libya and Gadaffi.
This is the problem with energy, our technologies are incredibly advanced in both of these sectors but even with how incredible they are they are still at the whym of the finance jew.
solar roof tiles + hydroelectric + wind, it's a no brainer, and it's cheap enough at this point that even without subsidies you can implement it at home without spending too much
>Killing off coal has nothing to do with cleanliness, it's all about the elites trying to drag us serfs back to the stone age by taking us off of cheap, abundant, efficient fuels.
>They want you scared, divided, powerless, and thinking that everything is your fault.
Exactly this
>coal is safe
youtube.com
Coal ain't cleaner than nuclear but it sure is efficient
>Pic related is my view right now
That's not a major problem. It was a small town, not abandoned. Compare that to the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
That's a beautiful view. Coal is gorgeous to look at.
>If you aren't a retarded commie then you can make a nuclear plant
The US and Europe are rapidly become communist countries, seriously. Yes, the West are retarded commies that soon won't be able to run a nuclear plant without disaster. France is fucked this century, doomed to suffer a meltdown.
A power plant autistic could easily figure out where I'm at
*now abandoned
What absolute bullshit. Even wind and solar power has killed more people than nuclear let alone the scores who died to coal.
That's not even counting the millions impacted by the soot dumped into the air.
Does coal explode when coolant pump #2 shits the bed?
Or we can put you on a bike and make you suck a cock at the same time to generate energy for my pizza rolls in the microwave
The boiler might blow but it would be nothing like nuclear meltdown
hmm, those look like Appalachian foothills. Alongside a river.
I'm gonna guess West Virginia... is it the AEP Mountaineer plant?
Thanks for giving us the power to shitpost user, have a good rest of your day, and stay safe.
Meltdowns do not create fission bomb explosions