Let me get this straight.
All of the rich people got rich off of capitalism but you're also telling me they're conspiring to turn the U.S. into a socialist/communist state?
Wouldn't they lose all their money?
How does it benefit them?
Explain yourselves.
Let me get this straight
Same as immigrants being anti-immigration, they want to make sure they're the last ones in
You're a retard if you think the people in control of society care about fake money that they can just print more of or make up more 0s and 1s on the computer. Jfc
>Wouldn't they lose all their money?
they wont. they climbed the ladder and now they are pulling it. we will forever be down here and they will forever be up there
You mean the fake money that everyone is upset about and willing to revolutionize over?
The fake money that they can print more of and cause inflation then lead to a recession?
Those at the top stay at the top once communism takes hold. It's just the fat cats pulling up the latter to ensure they face no upstarts or competition.
I think I'm misunderstanding something. Wouldn't the absence of capitalism mean that the state takes over the businesses.
What would that mean for Jeff Bezoz and Elon Musk. I'm sure they wouldn't be billionaires anymore.
It's all about the redistribution of wealth.
The only ones I can see still being powerful are the political elite.
rich people = political elite
no, they dont want pure socialism, they want a capitalist/socialist hybrid system. also, they are not confined to the US, they are global citizens and can move their money off shore or wherever they want
>wouldnt they lose their money
Money is worthless trash, when you have valuable physical assets. Along with this is theyre rich in the most valuable commodity of them all, influence
The socialist system comes, the plebians are now almost slaves and they are the new horribly corrupt top officials of the party
ok this makes sense
I got a guess on the Elite.
As a pleb with
it's more like
>socialism for thee, capitalism for me
> paper has value
Everything of worth, they already own
Is this the 'socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor' saying?
Socialism rid off mid class only.
>political
-lion
-pretty little animal
>real power
-energy
-physical might
-beauty
-goods and services
-healthy children
Look at China. They have tons of Billionaires. All of which are members of the Chinese Communist Party. Communism is great if you're at the top of the party. You can enrich yourself using state owned assets.
Isn't China partly capitalist, they said they aren't going full socialism until 2050 or some shit.
>Implying there is rich in a corporate socialist society
>Rich people have to literally take loans out on their assets to really spend money because otherwise taxes would obliterate their wealth.
>You can't even change jobs as a CEO, you are literally contracted into a company in a similar way the military contracts members.
They are trying to go back to feudalism if anything. People will have to literally work to pay off the money they owe simply for living. Instead of kings, you have a corporation in charge of large amounts of property or finances.
ability 4 rando to make biz (theoretically) is threat to smaller biz, big tech got to this point by all smaller biz's being bought by massive biz that had...special funding and partnerships. So rly u alrdy had communism 4 internet.
Retroactively applying this 2 all economy just means tighter control of all products available, and mechanisms for obtaining them. Communism is a way 2 lock in power and maximize extraction while crashing. Will not xplain why it means crashing, becuz is obvious
threat to *bigger biz.
There’s no such thing as communism you fucking moron. It’s a fairytale sold to useful idiots to seize absolute power. They want to repopulate at their discretion in a world where everyone is their slave.
>There’s no such thing as communism you fucking moron.
I didn't say it was a successful ideology, but it's an ideology nonetheless.
Stop trying to act smart on Any Forums.
Read the book Animal Farm for an allegory of the whole thing. Basic idea is to form an autonomous society, have a few "leaders" to "manage" it who can reap all the benefits while contributing little to nothing, then remove all ways into the leadership class. Lower class must continue on or they lose everything, upper class just leeches. As long as the lower class is dependent on their own productivity to survive, the upper class is perfectly set.
kek you need an anticonvulsant.
It’s an ideology as much as believing I can cast fireballs if I learn magic spells is an ideology. It’s retard talk that ignores natural law.
ah just a shill faggot who doesn't want an answer. KYS