The risk of a person in the U.S...

The definition from the US federal assault weapons ban was:

Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
>Folding or telescoping stock
>Pistol grip
>Bayonet mount
>Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
>Grenade launcher mount

Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
>Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
>Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor
>Barrel shroud safety feature that prevents burns to the operator
>Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more
>A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm.

Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
>Folding or telescoping stock
>Pistol grip
>Detachable magazine

Interesting, I also wonder what the crime rate especially burgarly and home invasions we're during that decade.

the risk of a person dying in a mass shooting has always been extremely low. slipping in the bathtub is far more dangerous...Now do the graph again with general all cause homicide you fucking brainlet

It's also easy to have less mass shootings when you
A) don't call them mass shootings when niggers do them, all the time
b) only organise fake (real bodies, sometimes, government organised operations) shootings when the laws aren't going your way, same as here in australia (fake port arthur shooting, real bodies but the shooter was a spec ops spook, or team of them) when they wanted to ban guns.
Try making a real logical argument for why we should let the biggest murderer of all time (government) have a monopoly on guns, alongside criminals (who give 0 fucks about gun laws) and disarm all the good people who keep them both in check?
Oh, you can't because you are a fuckhead who doesnt want to ban guns, he wants to make sure that only the government and private criminals have guns.

That’s a completely nonsensical definition. It’s like a grab bag of different unrelated shit where 2 or more equals “assault weapon, OMG!” What if you have a gun with only 1 of those but it crosses state lines?

look at these numbers. You'd save more lives by banning hammers or ladders than you could ever get banning ar15s. Not to mention most gun deaths are from suicide and gang violence. Tell me either of those two would stop if they couldn't get their hands on guns.

Columbine literally happened during that ban are you that stupid?

voca.ro/1lsvgId5Jqys

Slide thread
>mass shooting

What's a "mass shooting"?
need the datapoints and sources to define.

>risk of a person in the U.S. dying in a _______
Risk of a person in the U.S. who is not a black male under the age of 30 and does *not* reside in the dozen-or-so most violent crime-ridden urban centers
dying,
is virtually nonexistent.

Attached: us-murder-rates-1980-to-2010_AWB in effect.png (800x550, 59.05K)

Whats interesting about the '94 AWB argument is that thats the same year of the '94 crime bill. Wonder which made the actual difference

I don’t wonder

>60 deaths
>350m Americans
OMG TAKE MY FREEDOM PLEASE DADDY GOVERNMENT!!1

Attached: 1653456951871.webm (640x360, 2.95M)

Why was the number of mass shootings before 1995 lower than it is now, though?

Lol actual deaths are reduced by ar ownership

Amazing! So why didn't it stop Columbine from happening in 1999?

>oh my GOD! He has the shoulder thing that goes up. I REPEAT, HE HAS THE SHOULDER THING THAT GOES UP. WE'RE ALL DEAD. HE HAS THE SHOULDER THING THAT GOES UP!

Additional datapoint on the violent crime-ridden urban centers where most gun violence repeatedly occurs :
studies have shown that within these urban areas, there are
>1. Specific locations i.e. certain streetcorners/intersections and-or establishments where virtually *all* the shootings repeatedly occur
>2. select small number of individual recidivist perpetrators among the community population, who commit virtually *all* of the shootings-killings

TL/DR more than three-fourths of deadly shootings in the U.S. are committed by a select group of gang and gang-adjacent persons in the *exact same* areas of these cities, over and over again.

what is a woman?

But it was even lower in the 80s when there was even more access to guns. In fact, the more access to guns the public had, the lower the gun violence -- all the way back. So kindly fuck off with your illogic.

Maybe because the population was lower. Maybe because society want toxic and deeply sick back then.

And those are all assault weapons? Dishonest cunt

>Higher than preban

Attached: 1625945422194.png (713x611, 25.91K)

What other impacting variables are not shown in your chart?