if europeans can to go to a new continent, displace and attack the natives, and take it, why cant various undesirables do the same to europe? how do you square this circle, politically?
If europeans can to go to a new continent, displace and attack the natives, and take it...
David Foster
Jonathan Turner
europeans were on a god given mission
Jace Jackson
>cIrClE
kek
Anthony Morris
You're not wrong. What I think inspires the bitterness here is that Europeans traveled to distant lands with great ingenuity to take something, but what's occurring now is not a "reconquista" so to speak, but rather it's a mass suicide. The "undesirables" as you call them are invited by Europeans themselves. Even now, these lesser peoples cannot eviscerated greatness on their own. The Europeans have to bring them to Europe, feed them, clothe them, pay them, and lay down on their swords. It's pathetic and pitiful for all involved.
Christopher Rivera
They tried to kill us when we went to their countries, so we should try to kill them when they come to our countries.
Liam White
>eviscerated
*achieve
t. phone fag.
Adam Taylor
They aren’t white.
Jack Long
Because the shitskins aren't actually taking over shit they're being handed it. That's why even now I still can't take them seriously there's never been a time when shitskins have succeeded in a monopoly of force over whites.
Connor Lopez
The strong do as they will the weak suffer what they must. Do not allow yourself to become weak.
Aiden Gonzalez
>europeans
Whites are the problem, most Europeans did NOT do the (((genocides))) and atrocities that were committed by whites (anglo-saxon protestants).
Angel Anderson
It's not really pathetic when you consider that said Europeans benefit directly from bring them over. It's essentially the new slave trade with a "woke" or "PC" veneer.. whatever you wanna call it.
Aiden Myers
What the fuck are you talking about, precisely, when you use the word “can?”
Be specific. It is not that Europeans ”can” conquer a foreign territory, as if it is being permitted in some way, no. It is that Europeans were capable of doing as much.
Furthermore, retard, they did so in the name of increasing the wellbeing, success, wealth, prosperity, health and livelihoods of their nations, countrymen and families. This is where the modern invasion of Europe is entirely opposite. The invaders are not capable of conquering Europe by ways of war and strategy, only subvert it. The invaders are not exploring unknown territories to improve their already existing nations, they are fleeing like cowards from their rightfully inherited cultures and nations to live shallow lives in a country better than their own that they simultaneously think is flawed in its philosophical, cultural and religious heritage.
Jonathan Price
Because it was the african undesirables who did the same to America, Europe, Middle East, Asia and everywhere else too.
Hunter Cox
Can and capable mean the same thing
Jackson Hall
America was originally peopled by primitive, stone-aged tribes that would never be able to keep out technologically advanced invaders, and could never develop into an advanced, unified nation of their own. They were isolated and stultified, and they weren't going to make anything useful out of the two whole continents they possessed.
Europe is already heavily populated with the most advanced civilization on Earth, so anyone who pretends they can invade it is going to be from more backwards and less intelligent people anyway. They aren't coming to take over - they're coming to be obligate parasites.
Cameron Clark
“Can” likewise can mean “allowed, permitted” whereas “capable” means “able to, possible”
Nolan Perry
why would someone allow themselves to be invaded and destroyed? retarded question.
Ethan Wright
The only people that benefit from mass immigration are the rich. Everyone else must deal with the crime.
Charles Wilson
it was the easiest way to frame it for tards. im talking about it being acceptable specifically. at the end of the day the result is the same, regardless of whatever context or mitigating factors you want to add. a non native ethnic group comes in and replaces the native one
>The invaders are not capable of conquering Europe by ways of war and strategy, only subvert it
and yet they still do it. quicker and without a shot. unless you want to count truck of peace incidents. the west attempts to defend itself far less than american natives. who is truly weaker?
>they are fleeing like cowards from their rightfully inherited cultures and nations to live shallow lives
highly ironic
Carson Gonzalez
Because they are dumb and worship the Juju Bongo.
Thomas Fisher
Op is talking about morality, you allow in your morality that europeans can do these actions in invading foreign people and displacing them. The only thing in this context that europeans are capable of in this talk of morality is the action of displacing and invading, which is the exact same capability that nonwhites have when going into europe. Op doesn't care about how the displacing is achieved, he cares about why people here think europeans can do it but nonwhites can't in terms of what is morally allowed to people here
Isaiah Ramirez
Niggers no inventions
Whyde peepo make inventions
Whyde people dominate (inc. jews)
Niggers mad 300 years later
Not my problem
Cameron Russell
The cross, the folded arms of mannaseh and ephraim.
Eli Carter
>thinking the natives went peacefully
Not all tribes were women and fags, fag.
Angel Wilson
idjit, you were clearly right the first time.
Jason Taylor
>displace and attack the natives
Owen Sanchez
literally no one thinks the natives went peacefully, were brow beaten about how horrible and bloody the formation of this country was