How were Founding Fathers not simply successful terrorists?

If not then, what is terrorism anyway?
Explain yourself burgers

Attached: 1626642917446.jpg (1024x692, 131.35K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=l9S2Ko1jFxQ
youtube.com/watch?v=ABhyKEK-CDg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

They were but they killed or deported everyone who would prosecute them for it.

They didn't attack civilians. They were called terrorists, but they never hurt the loyalists. They're not terrorist like muslim extremists or Antifa going around attacking people that don't agree with them

you know what, good point

give it back

I get this but definition of terrorism doesn't necessary constitute civilian harm, which in the end makes them such
it's funny because definition of terrorism to my knowledge was invented by burgers too

ter·ror·ism
/ˈterəˌrizəm/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
"the fight against terrorism"

It's the literal definition.

You could say the founding fathers were terrorists, but they were terrorists only against a very small and vocal minority of Europeans who were told that they owned the Title to America.

Turns out if you just stomp on them until they die and toss their dead bodies into the Atlantic ocean, then that shuts them up real fast.

Any other British here representing the Crown and think they own America and telling us to lay down our arms? Put your vote into this ballot box we'll be super responsive on counting your vote and adding your dead body to the pile.

>especially against civilians
as I said - it does not necessarily constitute civilian harm
one of us seem to have a reading comprehension issue, no?

also, I found this vid in the last minute:
youtube.com/watch?v=l9S2Ko1jFxQ
vid isn't very interesting in itself, but comment section is

Can't be a terrorist if you win.

Attached: 167532212141564.png (500x647, 177.91K)

now that seems like an honest take
law of the jungle and all that
does that mean that you were illegal occupiers of the afganistan and they were the righteous rebel fighters (mujahedins that is)?

interesting takes all around

>especially
Take your own advice retard

Of course thats what it means, fuck afghans and that shithole but, they are the inhabitants of said sand nigger desert shithole.

Terrorists attack civilians and public landmarks in an attempt to coerce the public or achieve a political goal. The Founding Fathers of America waged a war.

They were terrorists, but they were right so it's cool. Violence is epic.

>VPN fag
youtube.com/watch?v=ABhyKEK-CDg
fuck you

Yes that's why they had to invent reasons for staying there even assuming the official story was all true, because according to the government Bin Laden was chased out of Afghanistan by 2002 and killed in 2011. We only withdrew in 2021? We were the bad guys.

They were successful terrorists. We live in the product of their terrorism. Any other questions?

you have laws in your country against terrorism though
shouldn't that mean your government should now prosecute themselves?
why nobody ever brought that up?
seriously
what does that even mean? Republic is a rule of law, supposedly

Republic by definition is a rule of law

Attached: 63463456346.png (1423x817, 1.16M)

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
You're 100% right they could definitely be considered terroist. The definition itself is tangible

would it be correct to name them then:
The Founding Terrorists
?

Attached: 542362352353.png (1441x974, 1.29M)

The government has turned tyrannical

tyrannical you say?
I think I have a meme for this

Attached: 1638516576237.png (1244x1196, 1M)

no bot, you have a lot to learn